Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00196
Original file (FD2003-00196.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
TYPE.
GEN

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

NONE

 

 

MEMBERS SITTING

   

ISSUES INDEX NUMBER

  

A94.53 A67.90
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
14 AUGUST 03 FD2003-00196

REMARKS

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

J

   
   

SIGNATURES

 

  
   

VA
SAF/MIBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 

 

AFHQ FORM 06-2077, JAN 00

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

PERSONAL APPEARANCE

      
           
 
  
   

Vz

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

GRADE AFSN/SSAN

AMN

X RECORD REVIEW

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

a eee OTHER DENY
| |%

.

J |
|

 

 

   

ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.

- SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDEN

Sah

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3° FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

Previous edition will be used.

(EF-V2)
rk

CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2003-00196

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

     

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to exercise
this right.

    
   
 
   
       
     
       
   
   
     
 
  

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of Discharge is denied.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after
a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any.

Issue, Applicant was discharged for conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. The records indicated
the applicant received an Article 15, two Letters of Reprimand, a Letter of Counseling, and a verbal counseling.
Her misconduct included two leave program violations, two instances of dereliction of duty, three instances of
financial irresponsibility, and impugning the integrity of the unit performance report review process and her
supervisor. The DRB opined that through the unit’s administrative actions, the applicant had ample
opportunities to change her negative behavior and was unwilling or unable to do so. The Board concluded the
misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of
the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

    
   
  

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

    
 
    

  

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2003-00196
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

P—.: -geae (Former AMN) (HGH SRA)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 26 Apr 96 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.50.2 (Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline).
Appeals for Honorable Disch.

2. BACKGROUND: |

a. DOB: 15 Jun 69. Enlmt Age: 21 3/12. Disch Age: 26 10/12. Educ: HS DIPL. .
AFOT: N/A. A-67, E-59, G-76, M-32. PAFSC: 4Y051 - Dental Lab Apprentice.
DAS: 21 Jul 91.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 10 Oct 90 - 12 Mar 91 (5 Months 3 Days) (Inactive).

(2) Enld as AB 13 Mar 91 for 4 yrs. Svd: 3 Yrs 1 Mos 23 Das,
all AMS. AMN - 13 Sep 91. Al1C - 13 Jul 92. SRA - 13 Sep 93. EPRs: 5,5.

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenld as SRA 6 May 94 for 4 yrs. Svd: 1 Yr 11 Mo 21 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AMN - 3 Apr 96 (Article 15, 3 Apr 96)

c. Time Lost: None.

d. Art 15’s: (1) 3 Apr 96, Shaw AFB, SC - Article 91. You, havin
received a lawful order from TSgt -p01P6

Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authonity in support of this recommendation are
attached. The commander exercising special court-martial jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide
whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are discharged, how your service
will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.

4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. I have
made an appointment for you to consult Cap quae Area Defense Counsel, 668-2437, at
building 1127, on 15 Apr 96 at 0930 hours. You may consult ctvilian counsel at your own expense.

5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the separation
authority to consider must reach me within three duty days after receipt of the notification memorandum,
unless you request and receive an extension for good cause shown. | will send them to the separation

authority.

6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will constitute a
waiver of your right to do so.

7. You must report to the Shaw AFB Hospital, Physical Examinations Section, on 15 Apr 96 at 1300
hours, for a medical examination.

8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy of AFI
36-3208 is available for your use in the orderly room.

9. In accordance with AFI 36-3001, you must relinquish all identification cards within three duty days of
receipt of this notification memorandum.

10. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.

  

Wh Colonel, USAF, DC

Commander

3 Attachments
1, Documents Supporting Reasons for Discharge

a. 20 DS/ Memorandum, dtd 27 Dec 94

b, ene corns, dtd 6 Jan 95

c. 20 SVS/SVF Memorandum, dtd 29 Aug 95, w/1 Atch
d. AF Form 174, dtd 30 Ang 95

e. 20 DS/SGD Memorandum, dtd 1 Sep 95
f. 20 a Misnprancha, dtd 8 Dec 95

   

k. AF Form 3070, dtd 3 Apr 96

1. SRW ite Presentation, dtd 28 Mar 96
m. QR emorandum, dtd 27 Mar 96

n. DOI 47-113, dtd 14 Feb 96

0 SR conn, dtd 27 Mar 96
p- emorandum, dtd 13 Dec 95
q- ME Memorandum, dtd 13 Dec 95
r , — emorandum, dtd 4 Dec 95

Memorandum, dtd 4 Dec 95
MMemorandum, dtd 29 Nov 95

  
  
 
 
  

u. TSge Siemorandum, dtd 4 Dec 95
¥. Te lemorandum, dtd 4 Dec 95
wi ; emorandum, dtd 4 Dec 95

x. AF Form 3132, dtd 18 Oct 95
y. AF Form 988, dtd 17 Nov 95
z, AF Form 988, dtd 20 Nov 95

aa. RRM heck #0927, dtd 7 Mar 96
2. Other Derogatory Data

a. 363d Medical Group Memorandum, dtd 5 Mar 93
3. Airman's Receipt of Notification Memorandum

FO2003~- COV

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00011

    Original file (FD2003-00011.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0011 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Applicant's Rebuttal to Discharge w/20 Atchs. Attachments: Letter of Reprimand dated 30 Oct 96 .

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00125

    Original file (FD2003-00125.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SIGNATURE OF RECORDER NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) tl AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN SRA Re: X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ay roe SUBMITIED 16 THE BOARD a ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 2 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 SAF/MIBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00220

    Original file (FD2003-00220.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0220 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. He also had six Letters of Reprimand and five Record of Individual Counseling for unsatisfactory performance, disrespectful attitude, missed appointments, late for duty, failure to use a seatbelt, failed room inspection, and dereliction of duty. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00096

    Original file (FD2003-00096.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES A93.09 INDEX NUMBER : EXHIBITS SUBMITTED, 10, THE BOARD A67,90 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN ad Vn TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL [YES | No | x VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x xX xX x LETTER OF NOTIFICATION CASE NUMBER BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00102

    Original file (FD2003-00102.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0102 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: Throughout my Air Force career I have made many choices.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00053

    Original file (FD2003-00053.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    mere AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN SRA | ee PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW ] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL NONE MEMBERS SITTING ea ISSUES INDEX NUMBER f iS ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A93.11, A94.05, A94.53 447.00 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE 03-05-28 CASE NUMBER FD2003-00053 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00065

    Original file (FD2003-00065.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD er as NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL’ NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON “GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x 4 x xX X }_ XxX ISSUES INDEX NUMBER : EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A93.09 A47.00, A49.00 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD [> APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00143

    Original file (FD2003-00143.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 6 AUG 03 FD2003-0143 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING “APPLICANT'S. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE =| £93-0143 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. b. Grade Status: SrA - 27...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00150

    Original file (FD2003-00150.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SIGNATURE OF RECOgEEa SAF/MIBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN AB aie Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL Me PK) PE PK OK ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00320

    Original file (FD2005-00320.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for misconduct. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE A I R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH SRA) 1. In addition to military counsel, you IS00 have the right to employ civilian counsel.