Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0492
Original file (FD2002-0492.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
. AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
Ce AB

PERSONAL APPEARANCE

‘| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

AFSN/SSAN

   

 
    

   
 

   
 

X RECORD REVIEW

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VOTE OF THE BOARD: ©
MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN VOTHC OTHER DENY
xX
X
x
| ft |] x
L
xX
ISSUES INDEX NUMBER wie EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE;
A94.05 A66.00 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
1 MAY 03 FD2002-0492 1]

 

| COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

     
 

 

 

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING
APPLICANT'S 1SSUB AND THE BOARD S DECISIONAL RATIONALARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE,

 

 

“REMARKS
Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.

SIGNATURE OF RECORDER SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDEST

 

 

DATE: 1 MAY'03

    

FROM:
SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3° FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0492

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, change the Reason and
Authority for discharge and change the RE Code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity
or impropriety, which would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant contends that his discharge was too harsh because he wasn’t on duty and was at a keg
party and was caught. He believes that this was not a severe incident to warrant a discharge. The record
indicates the applicant received an Article 15 for wrongfully using marijuana. Drug abuse is incompatible
with military service and airmen who abuse drugs one or more times are subject to discharge for
misconduct. The presence in the military environment of persons who engage in drug abuse seriously
impairs accomplishing the military mission. The applicant was not eligible for probation and rehabilitation
due to the fact that he used marijuana on two separate occasions and admitted to pre-service use of
marijuana five (5) times. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct
expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was
found to be appropriate. The Board found no evidence of any inequity or impropriety on which to base a
decision to upgrade the discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0492

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

aE (Former AB) (HGH A1C)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 16 Nov 01 UP AFI 36-
3208, para 5.54 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Appeals for Honorable Discharge, and

Change to Reentry Code, Reason and Authority.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 1 Feb 82. Enlmt Age: 18 0/12. Disch Age: 19 9/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-59, E-49, G-32, M-32. PAFSC: 3C131 - Radio Communications System

Apprentice. DAS: 3 Dec 00.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 18 Feb 00 - 7 Aug 00 (5 Months 21 Days) (Inactive).

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Enld as AMN 8 Aug 00 for 4 yrs. Svd: 1 Yr 3 Mos 9 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: AB - 9 Oct 01 (Article 15, 9 Oct 01)
Alc - 8 Jun O1

ec. Time Lost: None.

d. Art 15’s: (1) 9 Oct 01, Hurlburt Fld, FL + Article 112a. You did,
within the continental United States, between on or
about 15 Jun 01, and on or about 13 Aug 01, wrongfully
use marijuana. Reduction to AB. (No appeal) (No

mitigation)
e. Additional: None.
£. CM: None.
-g. Record of SV: None.
(Discharged from Hurlburt Fld)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (1) Yr (9) Mos (0) Das
TAMS: (1) Yr (3) Mos (9) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 4 Nov 02.
(Upgrade Discharge to Honorable, and Change Reentry Code, Reason and

Authority)
FD2002-0492

Issue: I wasn't on duty and was at a keg party and was caught. I self
admitted to smoking marijuana. I believe that this was not a severe incident to
warrant a discharge that I received. I want to rejoin the service but cannot
due to the fact I received this discharge. I would like my discharge upgraded.

My records indicatee (sic) that I was a perfect example of an airman.

ATCH
None.

14Feb03/cr
FO? 002 -OUG2

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
16th COMPONENT REPAIR SQUADRON (AFSOC)

 

29 OCT 200

MEMORANDUM FOR AB QQ nOgggRORAASIN UBIO?

FROM: 16 CS/CC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum

1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct, more
specifically, for drug abuse. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, -
section H, paragraph 5.54. If my recommendation for discharge is approved, your service will be
characterized as Honorable or General. I am recommending that your service be charactérized as

General.

2. My reason for this action is that between on or about 15 Jun 01 and on or about 13 Aug 01,
you wrongfully used marijuana, for which you received punishment under Article 15, dated

9 Oct 01, and an Unfavorable Information File (UIF) was established. This is the sole basis in
determining that you should be discharged and the characterization of your discharge.

3, Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising Special Court-Martial jurisdiction or a
higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force, If you
are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.

4, You have the right to consult counsel, Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.
I have made an appointment for you to consult the Area Defense Counsel, Hurlburt Field, FL,

Bldg 90042, 884-5216/5217, on 30 Oech O/ eat 40.5 hours. You may

consult civilian counsel at your own expense.

5. You have the right to submit statements on your own behalf, Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me within three workdays unless you request and
receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation authority,

6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

7. You are scheduled for a medical examination and you should report to the Hurlburt Clinic at

Y30 brs on_30 Oct O| for the examination.

Any Time... Anv Place
. ‘ FPUO2~- OYP2

8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 will be provided upon your request.

 

Ls

Attachments:

Documents supporting basis for discharge

AF Form 1137, undated (ip.)

AF Form 3070, dtd 9 Oct 01 (3p.)

OSI ROI#01309D17-S953577 (15p.)
Airman’s receipt of notification memorandum

1.
2.
3.
4.

G6/6'o4 AT? OK Mm “Wn er MAC oF Mice. § “Ane aod

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0440

    Original file (FD2002-0440.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    REMARKS Case heard at Washington, D.C. age of Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to ajfersonal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. en, CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0440 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0440 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD MISSING MEDICAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0344

    Original file (FD2002-0344.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ‘el tng AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Estimate n.d AB a TYPE sa PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBERS SITTING XxX [— rx xX xX | | xX ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXOIEOGEEMITIED TORMEBOARD Gc ee A01.00 A67.70 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 (| LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0002

    Original file (FD2002-0002.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was discharged for misconduct, namely drug abuse. Attachment: Examiner’s Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD2002-0002 (Former AMN) (HGH AMN) 1. Paragraph 5.54 provides that drug abuse is incompatible with military service, and airmen who abuse drugs one or more times are subject $0 discharge for misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0167

    Original file (FD2002-0167.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE BulaE FRE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER OS ad ad eal BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 12 December 2002 FD2002-0167 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING RCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0167 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00096

    Original file (FD2005-00096.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RAN W L P H AFB, TX 781 50-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE ?ERSOmEL COUIVCU AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAM) DR. EE WMC, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-4005-00(J96 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0434

    Original file (FD2002-0434.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2001-0434 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The Board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the board was able to identify none. The records indicated the applicant received one Article 15 for misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00394

    Original file (FD2006-00394.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00394 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. On or about 14 Mar 04, you falsely and wrongfully altered you military identification card by changing the year of birth from 1984 and 1981, for wbich action...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00162

    Original file (FD2003-00162.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TO THE BOARD A94,05 A74.00 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION | HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 30 JUL 03 FD2003-0162 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD — ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE r TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING | “APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00341

    Original file (FD2006-00341.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 "... AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I 1 NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIIISI. Respondent's Response: The respondent consulted counsel and submitted a written statement on her behalf. Forward a recommendation for separation under paragraph 5.54 with an Honorable discharge to the General Court-Martial Convening Authority, AFSOCICC (AFI 36-3208, para 5.56.2.1); c. Direct that the respondent be discharged from the Air Force with a Genmal dischargc without probation and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0155

    Original file (FD2002-0155.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0155 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) 1. Authority for Action: | have reviewed the attached administrative discharge package in accordance with AFI 36-3208 and find it legally sufficient to support a finding that the Responden ia is subject to discharge for Misconduct (Drug Abuse) under AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section H, Paragraph 5.54. Recommendation: I recommend that you sign the...