AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
pen AMN lit:
TYPE
X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES
MEMBERS SITTING
nen cmiii2i caiesiaiadiniaie ieee F:
INDEX NUMBER
A69.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
A93.19
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
| | TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING
CASE NUMBER
FD2002-0447
4 JUN 03
REMARKS
Case heard at Scott AFB, Illinois.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submitt an application to the AFBCMR.
SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT
SAF/MIBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1835 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3"? FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
(EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
FD2002-0447
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
— (Former AMN) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 24 JAN 02 UP AFI 36-
3208, para 5.32 (Failure in Alcohol Abuse Treatment). Appeals for Honorable
Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 30 Jul 82. Enlmt Age: 18 4/12. Disch Age: 19 5/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-67, E-66, G-66, M-49, PAFSC: 4A131 - Medical Material
Apprentice. DAS: 18 May 01.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 29 Nov 00 - 9 Jan 01 (1 month 12 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 10 Jan 01 for 6 yrs. Svd: 1 Yr 0 Mo 15 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AMN - 13 NOV O1 (Article 15, Vacation, 4 Dee 01)
AlC ~ 26 FEB 01
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15’s: (1) 4 Dec 01, Vacation, Ramstein AFB, Germany - Article 86.
You did, on or about 21 Nov 01, without authority, fail
to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of
duty. Article 134. You were, on or about 21 Nov 01, as
a result of wrongful previous overindulgence in
intoxicating liquor incapacitated for the proper
performance of your duties. Reduction to Amn.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
(2) 13 Nov 01, Ramstein AFB, Germany - Article 86. You
did, on or about 9 Oct 01, without authority, fail to go
at the time prescribed to your appointed place of.duty.
Article 134. You were, on or about 9 Oct O01, asa
result of previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor
incapacitated for the proper performance of your duties.
You were, on or about 5 Oct 01, drunk and disorderly.
Suspended reduction to Amn. Thirty days extra duty, and
a reprimand. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: LOC, 18 JUN 01 - Dereliction of duty.
MFR, OCT 01 - Failure to go.
£. CM: None.
FD2002-0447
g. Record of SV: None.
(Discharged from Offutt AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (1) Yrs (1) Mos (27) Das
TAMS: (1) Yrs (0) Mos (15) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 9 Oct 02.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: At the time that I enlisted with the USAF, I was given a waiver
for a DUI before I was able to enlist. I had alcohol abuse problems before
entering the military. Once in the USAF, I was assigned alcohol rehabilitation
by the military. During my treatment, stationed in Germany, the events of
09/11/2001 took place. With the stress of this situation, my friends being
deployed, away from my family, the stress was overbearing. At this point, my
only release was to drink alcohol. Unfortunately, this is the obvious reason
for my discharge. Again, unfortunately, the circumstances at the time prevailed
over my life.
I am currently enrolled in an alcohol treatment program. Once I feel that my
problem is cured, I am in hopes of joining the reserves.
Any and all consideration to my request would be greatly appreciated.
ATCH
1. DD Form 214.
24JAN03/ia
Pp2002-a 447
i -
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
86TH AIRLIFT WING (USAFE)
17 DEC ono
MEMORANDUM FOR
FROM: 86 MDSS/CC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. Iam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Failure in Alcohol
Abuse Treatment. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.32,
Failure in Alcohol Abuse Treatment. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be
characterized honorable or general. I am recommending your service be characterized as general.
2. My reason for this action is:
a. On 27 November 2001, you were discharged from the Alcohol and Drug Awareness
Prevention Treatment (ADAPT) program because of your inability to comply with the
specifications of your contract while receiving treatment. (Atch 1a).
3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SCM jurisdiction, or a higher
authority, will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the United States Air Force,
and if you are discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will
be ineligible for reenlistment in the United States Air Force, and any special pay, bonus, or
education assistance funds you have received may be subject to recoupment.
4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.
You have an appointment with , Area Defense Counsel, Ramstein Air
Base, Germany, Bldg 2111, 480-2182/2492 on . You may consult and
employ civilian counsel, if readily available, at your own expense. The Area Defense Counsel
requests that you stop by their office prior to your appointment to pickup the Administrative
Discharge Booklet.
5. You have the right to submit statements on your behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me by (3 duty days) 70 Dec at //32_ hours
unless you request and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the
separation authority.
6. If you fail to consult counsel or submit statements in your behalf, your failure will constitute a
waiver of your right to do so.
7. You must report in uniform with your medical records and an escort to the Ramstein Air Base
Clinic, Physical Exams, Building 2182 on @ 249 Lb Pte Ob for the evaluation. They will
[2262-OYY7
OO i
decide whether you need a complete physical exam or a family practice appointment. If an
__ examination is required, tell the doctor you need a “separation” physical examination. If you
wear glasses, you must bring them with you. If you wear contacts, you must be able to remove
them.
8. Although not a reason for your discharge, your incidents of misconduct, recorded in a letter of
counseling (LOC), a nonjudicial punishment action, and a vacation of suspended nonjudicial
punishment action are additional considerations and are therefore attached. (Atch 2a-2c).
9. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the orderly room.
10. Execute the attached acknowledgement and return it to me immediately,
Commander
Attachments:
1. Supporting Documents: Program Failure Memorandum, 27 Nov 01
2. Other Documents:
a. LOC, 18 Jun 01
b. Article 15, 13 Nov 01
c. Vacation Action, 6 Dec 01
3. Airman’s Receipt of Notification Memorandum
/ . o
YZ VY
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
86TH AIRLIFT WING (USAFE)
eo ES 200
MEMORANDUM FOR 8&6 AW/CC
FROM: 86 AW/JA
SUBJECT: Legal Review of Discharge
1. [have reviewed the administrative discharge action against Amns
324-80-5176, and find it legally sufficient to support her discharge under AFI 36-3208, Chapter
5, paragraph 5.32, Failure in Alcohol Abuse Treatment.
2. BASIS FOR THE ACTION: On 17 December 2001 ;
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0146
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ryo9_0146 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. First, per my Legal Review of Discharge, my commander at the time of the order felt my service was honorable, and my discharge should be named as such. DISCUSSION: The respondent's commander has recommended that the respondent be separated from the United States Air Force with an honorable discharge under AFI 36-3208, Section F, paragraph 5.32,...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00372
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD | NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UVOTHC OTHER DENY INDEX NUMBER A67.10 LES ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION hem |G | RD | eet BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD HEARING DATE 20 Nov 2003 CASE...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0468
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAMF. A94.43 A69.00 J | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE FD2001-0468 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL. On 3 May O01, after consulting military legal counsel, the respondent submitted a conditional waiver of her rights to a board hearing contingent upon receiving no less than an honorable discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00394
Additionally, member had an Article 15 for making a false official statement to a military police officer, and a vacation of his suspended reduction for two incidents of failure to go. At the time of the discharge, member consulted counsel and submitted a statement agreeing with the discharge action but criticizing the treatment program and requesting his service be characterized as honorable. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enld as AB 16 Nov 94 for 4 yrs.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00115
The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH AlC) 1. As a result, you received an LOR dated 26 Sep 00. c. On or about 17 Aug 0 1, you received non-judicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ for assaulting another Air Force member with a deadly weapon while under the influence of alcohol and wrongfully transporting a...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00276
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL = AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFR, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00023
MD 20762-1002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00023 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. You must report ta Hill AFB Clinic, 7321 11 th Street, Bldg 570 on hours for the examination.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00049
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAS~‘, FIRST M I D ~ I , E 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 , t l . ) The records indicated the applicant received a general discharge for Failure in an Alcohol Abuse Treatment Program. Copies of the documents to support this recommendation are attached and will be forwarded to the separation authority.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0310
Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0310 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD _— a. Basis for Discharge: Respondent has received three Article 15s, all of them alcohol-related. Discharge is appropriate.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0186
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | xp 002-0186 GENERAL; The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. An honorable discharge would be appropriate when the member's service generally has met Air Force standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty or when a member’s service has been so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons sct forth above, I recommend the respondent...