-
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD IXEAKING RECOKI)
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST M~DDLE
INITIAI;~
------I
APPLICANTS ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DFCISIONAL RATlONAl ARE DISCUSSED ON TllF A1 I ACHED AIR FORCk DlSCHARGF REVlhW BOARD DPCISIONAL RATIONALP
I
I
I
REMARKS
I Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
I
-
- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
\
- - - - - - - -
INDORSEMENT
DATE: 03-04-15
TO:
I
SAFlMIBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 150-4742
FROM.
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
I
(EF-V2)
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WMG, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
Previous edition will be used.
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMRFK
FD2002-04()7
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to general (under honorable conditions).
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant provides a sufficient
basis in clemency for a change of discharge,
Issue. The applicant did not receive an administrative discharge. He received a Bad Conduct Discharge, a
punitive discharge, as part of his sentence resulting from a Special Court Martial conviction. Under the
provisions of Title 10, U.S.C., Section 1553, the only basis for change of a Bad Conduct Discharge, is
clemency. The applicant submitted no evidence to warrant clemency and none was evidcnt in the record.
If the applicant can provide docurncnted information regarding matters of clemency, he should consider
exercising his right to a personal appearance hearing. Should he choose to exercise that right, he should be
prepared to provide the Board with evidence of any exemplary post-service accomplishments and
contl-ibutions to the community.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the applicant's punitive discharge by
Special Court Martial was appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is
insufficient basis as an act of clemency for change of discharge.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH SRA)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a BCD Disch fr USAF 26 Apr 96 UP Special
Court Martial Order No. 2 (Conviction by Court Martial). Appeals for General
Disch.
2 . BACKGROUND:
a , DOB: 30 Jan 67. Enlmt Age: 21 7/12. Disch Age: 29 2/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-76, E-49, G-48, M-39. PAFSC: 2S051 - Materiel Storage &
Distribution Journeyman. DAS: 5 D e c 88.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 13 Sep 88 - 3 Oct 88 (21 Days) (~nactive).
all AMS. AMN - 4 Apr 89. AIC - 4 Feb 90. SrA - 4 Oct 91. EPRS: 5 , 5 .
( 2 ) Enld as AB 4 Oct 88 for 4 yrs. Svd: 3 Yrs 0 Mos 18 Das,
3 . SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenld as SrA 23 Oct 91 for 6 yrs. Svd: 4 Yrs 6 Mos 3 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AMN - 14 Feb 96 (SPCM Order No. 7, 16 Feb 96)
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: None.
e. Additional: Unknown.
e. CM: Special Court Martial Order No 2, 12 November 1994.
CHARGE 1: Article 92. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification: Did, within the continental United States, on
divers occasions between on or about 25 Mar 94 to on or about 18
Jun 94, fail to obey a lawful order by wrongfully using his - - - - - -
Government Card for other than official travel-related expenses
away from his official duty station.
CHARGE 11: Article 107. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification: Did, at or near Barksdale Air Force, Louisiana on
or about 11 Jul 94, with intent to deceive, make an official
statement, to wit: that his ----------Government Card had been
stolen and that he had never received it, which statement, was
totally false, and then known to be so false. Sentence Adjudged
on 12 Oct 94: Bad conduct discharge, reduction to the grade of
airman, and confinement for 45 days.
g. Record of SV: 1 4 Jun 9 1 - 13 Jun 92 Barksdale AFB 4 (Annual)
1 4 Jun 92 - 13 Jun 93 Barksdale AFB 4 (Annual)
1 4 Jun 93 - 3 1 May 94 Barksdale AFB 4 (CRO)
(Discharged from Barksdale AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFAM, AFLSA, AFTR, AFGCM W/OLC, NDSM, AFOUA W/VALOR
W/20LC, NCOPMER.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: ( 7 ) Yrs ( 7 ) Mos
( 1 4 ) D a s
( 7 ) Yrs ( 6 ) Mos (23) Das
TAMS:
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 2 6 A u g 02.
(Change Discharge to General)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
2. DD Form 149.
*
I : .
rn
CORRECTED COPY DESTROY ALL OTHERS
+a, ,
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 2D BOMB WING (ACC)
BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, LOUISIANA 71110-2270
Special Court-Martial Order
No. 2
SENIOR AIR MAN^ United States Air Force, 2d
Supply Squadron, was arraigned at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana on the
following offenses at a court-martial convened by this headquarters.
12 November 1994
CHARGE I: ARTICLE 92. Plea: G. Finding: G.
Specification: Did, within the continental United States, on divers occasions
between on or about 25 March 1994 to on or about 18 June 1994, fail to obey a
Lawful. order by wrongfully using his American Express Government Card for
other than official travel-related expenses away from his official duty
station. Plea: G. Finding: G.
CHARGE 11: ARTICLE 107. Plea: G. Finding: G.
Specification: Did, at or near Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana on or
about II July 1994, with intent to deceive, make an official statement, to
wit: that his American Express Government Card had been stolen and that he had
never recived it, which statement, was totally false, and then known to be so
false. Plea: G. Finding: G.
Sentence Adjudged on 12 October 1994: Bad conduct discharge; reduction to
the grade of airman; confinement for 4 s days.
*
SENTENCE
ACT ION
In the case of SENIOR AIRMAN-
Force, 2d Supply Squadron, the sentence is approved and, except for the part
of the sentence extending to bad conduct discharge, will be executed. The Air
Force Base Corrections System is designated for the purpose of confinement,
and the confinement will be served therein or elsewhere as the Director, Air
Force Corrections, HQ AFSPA/SPC, may direct.
United States Air
Commander
71110-2417 (ACC)
1 - ~mn-2
1 -
1 -
1 -
SUPS, 845 Logistics Ln, Ste 100, Barksdale AFB LA
,AFLSA/JAJT-3, 2035 1st Drive W, Ste 2, Randolph AFB
2 Bw/JA, 66 Kenney Ave, Ste 300, Barksdale AFB LA
AFLSA/JADC, 414 Curtiss Rd, Ste 300, Barksdale AFB LA
1 - 2 BW/CC, 841 Fairchild AVe, Ste 100, Barksdale AFB LA 71110-2270
1 - 2 BW/JA, 66 Kenney Ave, Ste 300, Barksdale AFB LA 71110-2293
1 - 2 SITPS/CC, 845 Logistics Ln, Ste 300, Barksdale AJ?B LA 71110-2417
1 - 2 SPS/CC, 425 Lindbergh Rd E. Ste 200, Barksdale AFB LA 71110-3200
1 - 2 SPS/SPOR, 876 Luke Ave, Barksdale AFB LA 71110-2296
1 - 2 SPTG/CC, 109 Barksdale Blvd W, Barksdale AFB LA 71110-2164
2 - 2 CPTS/FMF, 345 Davis Ave W, Ste 300, Barksdale AFB La 71110-2074
4 - 2 MSS/MSMPP/MSMPR/MSMUE/MSMEC, 345 Davis Ave W, Ste 200, Barkadale AFB LA
1 - 8 AF/CC, 245 Davis Ave E l Rm 200, Barksdare AFB LA 71110-2279
6 - 8 AF/JA, 66 Kenney Ave, Ste 201, Barksdale AFB LA 71120-2290
10- AFLSA/JAJM, 172 Luke AVe, Ste 343, BolLing AFB DC 20332-5113
2 - DFAS-DE/FJscM/FYDEB, 6760 E Irvington Place, Denver 80279-3000
1 - HQ AFMPC/DPMDOMl, 550 C Street W, S t e 21, Randolph AFB TX 78150-4723
6 - HQ AFSPA/SPC, 8201 B Ave, S . E e L Kirkland AFB, NM 87117-6001
2 - 11 SPTW/JAJR, 20 MacDkll Blvd,,Ste 207, B a l l i n g - A F B DC 20332-5100
1 - 497 IG/XNSB, 211 Brookley Avenue, Ste 200, Bolling AFB DC 20332-5108
71110-2073
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS EIGHTH AIR FORCE (ACC)
BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE LOUISIANA 71 110-2279
Special Court-Martial Order
No. 7
16 F e b r u a r y 1996
In the special court-martial case of SENIOR
United States Air Force, 26
o bad-
coliduct discharge, confinement for 45 days, and reduction to airman as promulgated
in Special Court-Martial Order No. 2 , Headquarters 2d Bomb Wing, dated
12 November 1994, has been fnlally affirmed. Article 7 1 (c) having been complied
with, the bad-conduct discharge will be executed. Thc sentence was adjudged on
12 October 1994 (ACMS 28994).
Commander
I -
2022 Chester, Sl~reveport L A 71 103 ('ACC)
Randoluh AFB TX 78 150-5000 (MJ,
USAF Judiciary Central Cir~i.ij~. 2035 1st Dr 'G S ~ L 3
AFI,S.A/J-AD&', 4 14 curtiss !
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00424
AIK FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONAIJE ( A\T NIIMIIb R FD-2005-00424 - C;E;N EKAL: The applicant appeals for upgradc of discharge to general I'llc ;~l'plic'ant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Iievicw Board (DKB) but declillc(1 to cicrcisc this right. f. CM: Special Court Martial Order No,13 - 27 Apr 93 CHARGE 1: Dismissed. Finding: Guilty Specification: Did, at or near Barksdale AFB, LA, between on or about 2 Jan 93 to on or about 9 Jan 93, wrongfully...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00346
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. Sentence adjudged by judge alone on 20 Nov 02: Reduction to AB, confinement for 50 days, and a bad conduct discharge. (ACM S30267) Commander DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE OFFICE OF THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL The United States Court of...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0028
The applicant received a Bad Conduct Discharge, a punitive discharge, as part of his sentence resulting from a Special Court-Martial conviction. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD2002-0028 (Former AB) (HGH Unknown) 1. Plea: G. Finding: G. Specification: Did, at or near Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho, from on or about 20 y, of a value of about September 1997 to on or about 10 October 19 $2,600.00, the property of...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00335
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clen~ency, for change of discharge. d. Art 15's: (1) 05 Mar 02, Spangdahlem AB, Germany - Article 86. : United States Air Force, 52d Aimaft CHARGE I: Article 112a Plea: G. Finding: G. Specification: Did,at or near Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, between on or about 1...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00276
(No appeal) (No mitigation) .......................... (2) 22 Oct 00, Hurlburt Field, FL - Article 121. HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND (AFSOC) DEPARTMENT OF TElE AIR FORCE =BURT FIELD, FLORIDA 32544-5273 cO-urt-M& Order In the special court-martial case of AIRMAN BASIC i United States Air Force, 16th Transportation Squadron, t h e - i ~ i i n ~ e - i 0 - a ~ b - a 6 ~ ~ 0 d ~ e and confinement for 4 months as promulgated in Special Court-Martial Order No. Plea: G...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0353
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ppo001-0353 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Plea: G. Finding: G. Specification: Did, at or near Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, between on or about 11 May 1995 and on or about 16 May 1995, wrongfully use marijuana, Plea: G. Finding: G. SENTENCE Sentence adjudged on 19 July 1995: Bad conduct discharge, 30 days confinement, and reduction to the pay grade of E-1. Sentencing evidence...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00017
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE I CASENUMBER FD-0 1 -000 17 GENERAL: The applicant appealed for upgrade of his discharge frombailreofiduct to h6-k applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at Andrews AFB, MD, on April 5,2001. Issue 2 : At the time of my court martial, the Base Commander was more likely to approve a "bad conduct" discharge or worse then receive approve lesser punishment. Issue 3: Out of the eight Air...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0475
J CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court Martial was appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis as an act of clemency for change of discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MI3 (Former AB) (HGK SRA) 1. Svd: 3 Yrs 0 Mo 20 Das, of which AMS is 2 Yrs 11 Mos 1 Das (ex: 1 Month 19 Days lost time) b. Grade...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00151
* Reason and A u t h o r i t y + R e e n l i s t m e n t Code I C-..-.-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-.-..,,-..-,.,..-..-....-..-..-..-..-..-.......-..-..-..-..-..-....-..-..-..-..-..-..-..t - TO: SAFMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 V~~~~~~~~~~~ FROM: - DATE: 1218R006 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 10761-7001 I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00272
)RD kLOOK ANOREWS AFR, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I 1 C I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NClMBtiR FD-2005-00272 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to general. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. ...