AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
as, AMN | AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00033
The Vacation action was for failure to go to appointed place of duty. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A ~ C ) 1. At or near RAF Lakenheath, UK, on or about 3 Feb 04 you did, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty and received the same as in paragraph 2k; m. At or near Sheppard Air Force Base, TX, on or about 1 1 Jul03 you were disorderly while on duty and...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00272
- 7 I DENY ( INDEX NUMBER A49.00 A67.90 HEARING DATE 28 Oct 2003 CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00272 I I I Case heard at Washington, D.C. X ; a ~ p I ORDER APPOMTMG THE BOARD APPLlCATlON FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE I;:,%.. 1 2 3 1 LETTER OF NOTlFlCATlON 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE ~ @ ~ ~ J @ Q ~ %@ ~ COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE I APWCANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISiONM RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00142
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE I NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUhIBER I A67.90 I . The records indicated the applicant received one Article 15 for dereliction of duty and for causing a disturbance in complete view of the public by swearing at and striking an NCO and resisting apprehension, one Letter of Reprimand for inappropriate behavior and disrespect of authority, and one Letter of Admonishment for dereliction of duty. ...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00175
For this you received a Letter of Counseling, dated 4 March 2000 (Attachment 10). For this, you received a Letter of Counseling dated 13 March 2000 (Attachment 1 1). Record of Individual Counseling, dated 22 February 2000 10.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00458
The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. (No appeal) (No mitigation) 26 Jul 01, RAF Lakenheath, UK - Article 121.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00032
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0032 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s for failure to obey a lawful command to take the Anthrax vaccination. (Appeal/Denied) (No mitigation) (2) 23 Jan 01, RAF Lakenheath, UK ~ Article 90.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00373
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00373 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military mcmbers, and the characterization of thc discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate; however, if he can provide additional documented information to substantiate his issue, he should consider exercising his right to make a...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00063
The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s and a Letter of Reprimand for misconduct during his time of service. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other information contained in the records. Article 15, dtd 14 Jan 94 w Atch’s
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0281
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pnyo3-9291 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Approve separation and direct that the respondent be discharged with a general discharge, or c. Approve the separation but suspend it subject to probation and rehabilitation under AFI 36-3208, Chapter 7, or d. Return the discharge package to the unit and direct that a discharge board be convened to determine whether an under other than...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2005-00317
If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, thc applicant should consider exercising his right to make a personal appcarance bcfore the Board. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that thc applicant was provided full administrative due process. I (2) 4 Nov 02, RAF...