abche
PERSONAL APPEARANCE _ 7 X_ RECORD REVIEW _
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANTRATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
_ MEMBERS SITTING
— x
~~ x
x
xX
x
TUES “T INDEX NUMBER i ERRBNIS SUBMEELED.IO Te ROARED.
ASS, (WO AGT7.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
\" 2? | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 | LEFTER OF NOTIFICATION ~
HEARING DATE mS | Cask NUMBER ° ~ 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
27 AUG 02 FD2002-0142 COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD “—
[ ADDITONAL EXMITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TT TAPE RECORDING Gf PERSONAL ATPERANCE IIRARING
CHART AEMIEW CARE OBCISM RE BAT IONATE
HS EMLARKS
Case heard at Washington, 1.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance, and the right to submit an application to
the AFBCMR.
BOARD PRESIDENG
SAR/MIBR SRCRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
S50 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH APL, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMANT 1K. EL WING, 3°? FLOOR
ANDREWS AID, MID 20762-7007
: Previous edition will be used.
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FDO1-0142
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge,
and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was able to identify none that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUE: The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the
available service record, The Board revicwed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or
inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated applicant had
received two Article 15’s for using his government credit card for unofficial purposes and wrongfully using
his government computer to process pornography. Also, the applicant received a Vacation action on her
reduction to Airman for using his government credit card for unofficial purposes. He also received two
Letters of Counseling for failure to go, lying, missing a medical appointment and unauthorized use of a
computer. The Board concluded the disciplinary infractions were a significant departure from the conduct
expected of all military members. ‘he Board found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on
which to base an upgrade of discharge,
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should noi be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0142
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFR, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 01/10/30 UP AFT 36-3208,
para 5.49 (Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals for Honorable Digch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 79/09/15. Enlmt Age: 19 0/12. Disch Age: 22 11/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A, A-31, E-29, G-18, M-60. PAFSC: 2A653 - Aircrew Egress Systems
Specialist. DAS: 99/04/16.
b. Prior Sv: None
4, SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 98/09/23 for 4 yrs. Svd: 3 Yra 1 Mo 8 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AB - 01/09/20 (Art 15, 01/09/20)
AMN - 01/07/31 (Art 15, Vacated, 01/09/19)
Alc - 00/01/24
AMN - 99/03/23
c. Time Lost: None
d. Art 15's: (1) 01/09/20, Eielson AFB AK, Article 92. You, did, on or
about 19 Auqust 2001, violate a lawful general
regulation, to wit: AFI 33-129, para 6.1.3, dated 4
April 2001, by wrongfully using your government -
provided computer to process pornography. Reduced to
the grade of AB, restriction to Eielson AFB for 14
days, and 14 daya extra duty. (Appeal/Denied). (No
mitigation) .
{2) 01/09/10, Vacation, Bielson AFB AK, Vacation, Article
92. ° You, who knew cf your duties, at or near Las
Vegas, Nevada, on divers occasions between on or about:
4 May 2001 and on or about 5 May 2001, were derelict in
the performance of those duties in that you willfully
failed to refrain from using your Government issued
txeavel card for official purposes only, as it was your
duty to do. Reduced to the grade of AMN. (No appeal).
(No mitigation).
(3) 01/07/31, Eielson AFB AK, Article 92, You, who knew of
your duties, at or near Las Vegas, Nevada, on divers
occasions between on or about 4 May 2001 and on or
about 5 May 2001, were derelict in the performance of
FN2002-0142
those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain
from using your Government issued travel card for
official purposes only, as it was your duty to do,
Reduction to the grade of AMN (suspended until 30
January 2002}, f£orfeiture of 5100.00 per month for 2
months, restriction to Eielson AFB for 21 days, and 21
days extra duty. (No appeal) (Ne mitigation),
e, Additional: LOC, 00/01/25 - Failure to go, lying, missed medical
appointment.
LOC, 00/03/29 - Unauthorized use of a computer.
f. CM: None
g. Record of 8V: 98/09/23 - 00/05/22 Eielson AFB 3 (Initial)
00/05/23 - 01/05/22 Hielson AFB 5 (Annual)
(Discharged from Eielgon AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (3) Yrs (1) Mo (8) Das
TAMS: (3) Yrs (1} Mo (8) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293} dtd 02/02/25.
(Change Discharge to Hon)
NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.
ATCH
1. SF 180, Request Pertaining to Military Records
2, Request for Character of Service Upgrade.
02/07/12cr
FD. 2202- O/ $Z_
‘DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
PACIFIC AIR FORCES
17 Oet O1
MEMORANDUM FOR 354 FW/CC
FROM: 354 FW/JA
3112 Broadway Ave Unit 2B
Eielson AI'B AK 99702-1881
SUBJECT: Lege
Review a AEED 36- 32 and AFI 36-3208 Discharge Action
Similar Decisions
-
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0158
Original file (FD2002-0158.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
-
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
‘
MEMBERS SITTING
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
n
GRADE AFSN/SSAN
ene,
X RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
AMN
ry ‘ORDER APPOINTING TH BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
ISSUES INDEX NUMBER
A92,37, A94,53 A67,10
| HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
02-10-25 FD2002-0158
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
submit an application to the...
-
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00079
Original file (FD01-00079.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
FD-01-00079
(Former SRA)
1. c. Recommend the respondent be separated with an honorable discharge, with or without
probation and rehabilitation, and forward the case to the General Court-Martial Convening
Authority (1 1 AF/CC) or his designee (1 1 AF/CV) for action. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air
Force and any spG%l pay, bonus, or education...
-
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00439
Original file (FD2005-00439.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider
exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. In support of this action, the commander cites the following reasons: (1) SrA - - - - - - -,
obey a lawful order given to him by MSgt ;--- ----- ---
issue concerning his moving from one room to another; (2) He actively acted as a "look out"
while a civilian friend smoked marijuana; (3) He was delinquent in making his...
-
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0091
Original file (FD2002-0091.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0091
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
_— (Former SRA) (HGH SSGT)
pee
1, MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 96/02/23 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). In addition
to military counsel, you have the right. The discharge board or, the discharge authority will make the finding and recommendations
required under 10 U.S.C.
-
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0206
Original file (FD2001-0206.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0206
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former A1C) (HGH A1C)
1. ~ 02.06
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
PACIFIC AIR FORCES
MEMORANDUM FOR 354 FW/CC
FROM: 354 FW/JA
SUBJECT: Legal Review of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208 Discharge Action -
le. Therefore, iAGQBPshould be discharged from the Air Force with Misconduct-Minor
Disciplinary Infractions, paragraph 5.49 as the basis.
-
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0269
Original file (FD2002-0269.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0269
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0269
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AI1C) (HGH SRA)
1. You, did, on
or about 23 Jan 02, without authority, fail to go at
the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.
-
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0472
Original file (FD2002-0472.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
Additionally, he
received a Letter of Reprimand and two Letters of Counseling for failure to obey an order and dereliction of
duty, for being involved in a dispute while under the influence of alcohol, and for driving a vehicle with
three underage passengers who were intoxicated. Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH SRA)
1. b. Grade Status: AMN - 5 AUG 02 (Article 15, 5 Aug 02)
SRA - 18 OCT 01
A1C - 18...
-
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00151
Original file (FD2004-00151.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 6 Apr 04
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: I believe my discharge of General Under Honorable Conditions is
damaging on my behalf. Copies of the documents to be fonvarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached.
-
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0048
Original file (FD2002-0048.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
I
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The Respondent’s
commander has recommended discharge in accordance with AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49, Minor
Disciplinary Infractions, with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge characterization. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for minor disciplinary
infractions.
-
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0292
Original file (FD2002-0292.pdf)
Auto-classification:
Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
=e AMN |