_r
PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBERS SITTING
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
ISSUES INDEX NUMBER
A01.13, A92.01, A94.05, A28.10 1 | ORDE
A92,21 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
/ 3. | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
HEARING DATE CASENUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
02-07-24 FD2002-0084 -
ot
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPER.ANCE HEARING
i
REMARKS
Case, heard at Washington, D.C.
dvrsapplicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
<
SIGNATURE OF RECO
SAF/MIBR
350 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEI. COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°” FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
Previous edition will be used.
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2)
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp2092-0084
GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge and to change his
reenlistment code.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code, are denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
Issue. Applicant received an Honorable discharge based on a personality disorder that interfered with
military service but did not medically disqualify him. Applicant contends the discharge was too harsh, and
implies that the record does not support the reason for discharge in view of his otherwise 9 years of
satisfactory service. Applicant states he was having marital problems, and used poor judgment counseling a
female airman who was also having relationship problems; this “got too personal and out of hand.”
Records review disclosed member was diagnosed with paraphilia not otherwise specified, and a personality
disorder with antisocial and compulsive features after a thorough evaluation that included interviews of
member, his chain of command, affected females, and psychological testing. The clinicians stated that
member’s behaviors “clearly exceeded societal limitations”, and that member was in need of aggressive
treatment for psychosexual dysfunction”, with a “guarded” prognosis for his recognition of the severity of
his problem as well as continued long term military functioning. At the time of discharge, member
unconditionally waived his right to have his case heard by an administrative discharge board and to submit
matters in his own behalf. Through the records review the Board confirmed member’s ability to function in
a military environment was impaired, and could not find an impropriety or an inequity upon which to base a
change in reason or authority for the discharge, or his reenlistment code.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis to
change the reason or authority for the discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD220-0084
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former SRA) (HGH SGT)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 91/05/13 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5-11i (Conditions That Interfere with Military Service). Appeals for Change
Reason & Authority for Discharge and Change the RE Code Disch.
Zz. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 61/12/24. Enlmt Age: 19 9/12. Disch Age: 29 4/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFOT: N/A. A-29, E-48, G-33, M-84. PAFSC: 55550 - Production Control
Specialist. DAS: 90/05/23.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 81/09/25 - 82/02/22 (4 months 28 days) (Inactive).
(2) Enlisted as AB 82/02/23 for 4 yrs. Reenlisted as SrA
85/07/01 for 4 yrs. Svd: 7 yrs 2 months 4 days, all AMS. AMN - 82/08/23. AIC -
83/02/27. SrA - 85/03/23. Sgt-(EPR Indicates): 86/01/04-87/01/03. APRs:
8,8,9,9,9,9.
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenlisted as Sgt 89/04/27 for 4 yrs. Extended 89/12/07. Svd: 02 Yrs
00 Mo 17 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: SrA - 85/03/23 (NCO Status vacated 91/05/00)
ec. Time Lost: none.
d. Art 15's: (1) none.
e. Additional: none.
fF. CM: none.
g. Record of SV: 88/05/08 - 89/05/17 Sheppard AFB 9 (Annual)
89/05/08 - 90/03/17 Sheppard AFB 4 (CRO)
90/03/18 - 91/01/01 Eielson AFB 4 (CRO)
(Discharged from Eielson AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, NCOPMER, AFAM, AFLSAR W/1 OLC, AFOUA, AFGCM
W/2 OLCS.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (09) Yrs (07) Mos (19) Das
TAMS: (09) Yrs (02) Mos (21) Das
FD2002-0084
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/02/21.
(Change Discharge to Eielson AFB)
Issue 1: ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1, Applicant's Issues.
02/06/10/ia
REPLY TO
ATTN OF:
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
PACIFIC AIR FORCES
343 TFW/JA : 9 May 91
3112 BROADWAY AVE STE 1
EIELSON AFB AK 99702~1870
Legal Review of AFR 39-10 Discharge Action :)
10. sag hi statement,
undated
11. DD Form 418, 3 May 91
12, Airman's Acknowledgment
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0091
Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0091 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD _— (Former SRA) (HGH SSGT) pee 1, MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 96/02/23 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). In addition to military counsel, you have the right. The discharge board or, the discharge authority will make the finding and recommendations required under 10 U.S.C.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0269
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0269 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0269 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AI1C) (HGH SRA) 1. You, did, on or about 23 Jan 02, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0107
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0107 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant provides a sufficient basis in clemency for a change of discharge. month for six months, and reduction to AB.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00051
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION MEMBERS SITTING AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN X RECORD REVIEW —————E = = @&@=—=—=
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0367
ARE DISCUSSED ON: THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0367 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. FD2002-0367 (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 38 months of service plus with no other adverse action.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0035
X PERSONAL APPEARANCE ) NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL —-t ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94.05, A92.15, A92.19, A67,90 1 A01.43 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE ~~~) CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 02-10-03 FD2002-0035 —P COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ‘ee | ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING —— REMARKS + Change...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0442
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE °D2001-0442 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of his general discharge to honorable. (2) Did on or about 11 Mar 92, at Tampa, FL, unlawfully strike NT a child under the age of 16 years, in the face with his hand, as evidenced by a Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceeding dated 28 May 92. Recommend the Respondent be discharged with a General Discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0356
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMRER FD02-0356 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The record indicates that the applicant was discharged with an Under Other Than Honorable Discharge for being convicted of capital murder by civilian authorities. 2. bly reason for this action is you were, on or about 24 Sep 96, tried and convicted in tfie Criminal District C o w Number Three, Tarrant County, Texas, of Capital birder.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0075
CASI NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE =| pp3n92.9975 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. ATCH None FD2002-0075 02/07/30/er * ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW ROARD HEARING RECORD tne ee ome: NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) — GRADE, AVSN/SSAN Wn AMN | Sanat EE St -. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0182 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD amgeniinn.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0221
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Te AIC TYPE UVOTHC PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW _| COUNSEL NAME. The applicant did not appear. ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) service characterization from the Air Force Reserve for commission of a serious offense (theft of government property) and for unsatisfactory duty performance.