AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
I
FD2002-0047
GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Change of reason and authority for discharge are denied.
The Board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity
or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
Issue. Applicant received an Honorable discharge based on a personality disorder that interfered with
military service but did not medically disqualify her. Additionally member had an Article 15 for disorderly
conduct and making a false official statement, had a referral “2” Enlisted Performance Report, and
exceeded Weight and Body Fat Measurement Program standards. Applicant contends the discharge was
improper because she did not have a personality disorder, and implies that the record does not support the
reason for discharge. She states she was unhappy in the military because of a work-related incident she felt
was improperly handled, and having a supervisor who didn’t like her. Records review disclosed member
was a patient of the Mental Health Clinic from September 1998 through the time of her discharge. Before
the discharge was recommended, it was determined by the Air Force Chief of Mental Health Services at
member’s duty location, along with a civilian psychiatrist and civilian psychologist, that member had an
adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety, depressed mood, and a schizoid personality disorder. This was
deemed related to distress about a pending permanent change of station to Korea, and member’s concern
about having to work in close proximity to others and live with a roommate. The clinicians stated that if
member were sent to Korea she would be unlikely to successhlly complete the assignment due to her
aversion to associating with other people, and that member had a poor prognosis for long term military
functioning because increased supervisory responsibility would be incompatible with her diagnosis. At the
time of discharge member consulted legal counsel but chose not to submit matters in her own behalf.
Through the records review the Board confirmed member’s ability to hnction in a military environment
was impaired, and could not find an impropriety or an inequity upon which to base a change in reason or
authority for the discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the board hrther concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis to
change the reason or authority for the discharge, thus the applicant’s discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner’s Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
FD2002-0047
(Former SRA) (HGH SRA)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a Honorable Disch fr USAF 99/08/25 UP AFI
36-3208, para 5.11.1 (Personality Disorder).
Authority for Disch.
Appeals for a Change in Reason and
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 70/04/12. Enlmt Age: 24 4/12.
AFQT: N/A. A-22, E-93, G-88, M-51. PAFSC
Systems Operations Journeyman. DAS: 95/05/17.
Disch Age: 29 4/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
3C051 - Communications-Computer
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 94/08/18 - 94/12/07 ( 3 months 20 days) (Inactive).
(2) Enlisted as A1C 94/12/08 for 4 yrs. Svd: 3 yrs 4 months
0 days, all AMs. SRA - 97/04/08. EPRs: 5 , s .
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
1
1
a. Reenlisted as SRA 98/04/09 for 4 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 04 Mo 16 Das, all
AMs.
b. Grade Status: none.
c. Time Lost: none.
d. Art 1 5 ’ s :
(1) 98/10/06, David-Monthan AFB, AZ - Article 107. -JU,
did, on or about 17 Sep 98, with intent to deceive,
make to MSgt -------, an official statement, to wit:
that you had not made a telephone call, to Mrs. ------,
which statement was totally false, and was then known
by you to be so false. Article 134. You, were, on or
about 16 Sep 98, disorderly in that you called Mrs.----
- - - residence screaming and yelling, which conduct was
of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
Reduction to A1C (suspended until 04 Feb 99),
forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for two months
(suspended until 04 Feb 99), 7 days extra duty, and a
reprimand. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional :, none.
f. CM: none.
g. Record of SV: 97/07/16 - 98/07/15 Davis-Monthan AFB 4 (Annual)
98/07/16 - 99/07/15 Davis-Monthan AFB 2 (Annua1)REF
FD2002-0047
(Discharged from Davis-Monthan AFB
h. Awards & Decs: AFLSAR, AFTR, NDSM, AFOUA, AFGCM.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: ( 0 5 ) Yrs ( 0 0 ) Mos (08) Das
TAMS: (04) Yrs ( 0 8 ) Mos (17) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/01/28.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: On August 25, 1999, I received an honorable and involuntary
discharge from the Air Force. The reason for separation on my DD-214 is
"personality disorder". (sic) I want this changed because I believe the
diagnosis is inaccurate; and having it on my DD-214 may limit my future
employment options.
I started going for counseling in September of 1998 at the base mental health
Before that time I had not received any mental health counseling either
center.
on or off base. I started going because of work related problems. There was a
work-related incident I felt was handled in a way that was very unfair to me,
and I found out a person who had always disliked me was going to be my new
supervisor.
These things completely changed my attitude about my job and about the Air
Force. I hated going to work after that, I hated my job duties, I hated the
people who had treated me so badly, and I hated the Air Force. I had just re-
enlisted in April of 1998, but after September I was looking forward to getting
out. I no longer had any desire to be promoted, I just wanted out.
For several weeks I attended stress management and anger management at the base
mental health center, and had individual counseling sessions until I left the
Air Force in August of 1999. But this never made me any less angry or any less
depressed.
I intended to stay in the Air Force until my term was up in April of 2002, but
there was an unexpected opportunity to get out much sooner. I received orders
to go to Korea in May of 1999. The counselor I was seeing at the time said I
might not be deployable, and if I took some psychiatric tests he could find out.
He implied I should exaggerate my normal personality traits, so that is what I
did. I didn't say anything that was not true, but I mentioned my tendency to be
introverted and solitary as many times as I could. So I got diagnosed with
schizoid personality disorder. ,
Although I was glad to be out of the Air Force, having the words "personality
disorder" on my DD-214 was a problem right away. I didn't like showing it to
anyone. I applied for a job with the state and claimed veteran status, and I
think they never considered my application for that reason.
After doing some research I became convinced the diagnosis was inaccurate, so I
This one showed
went to the veterans' center and took another psychiatric test.
that I have no mental illnesses. I am enclosing a copy of it as evidence.
Please review my case as soon as possible.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
2. DD Form 2 1 4 .
3 . Senatorial Correspondence.
4. Privacy Act Consent Form.
5. Congressional Response.
FD2002-0047
02/05/15/ia
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 355TH WING (ACC)
DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, ARIZONA
MEMORANDUM FOR 355 WG/CC
FROM: 355 WGIJA
SUBJECT: Legal Review of Proposed Discharge
355 cs
f SrA
1. LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: I have reviewed the administrative discharge case file regarding
espondent. The proposed discharge is supported by the evidence.
e the rights of the Respondent. Therefore, the file is legally
sufficient, subject to a medical determination that the Respondent is qualified for worldwide duty
and separation.
355 CS/CC, recommends the Respondent be discharged from the Air Force under AFI
2. BASIS FOR DISCHARGE AND REHABILITATIVE MEASURES: M
-,
36-3208, paragraph 5.1 1.1 mental disorders, without probation and rehabilitation. He
recommends the Respondent’s service be characterized as honorable. The basis for the proposed
discharge is the Respondent’s diagnosed Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and
Depressed Mood and a Schizoid Personality Disorder that significantly interferes with her ability
to function effectively in the military. This disorder was diagnosed in the course of an evaluation
occurring on 1 Jun 99. The diagnosis and opinion of the evaluating mental health professional
support the existence of a mental disorder so severe that it significantly interferes with the
Respondent’s continued military service.
3. SERVICE HISTORY: The Respondent has been on active duty for approximately 4 years
and 8 months. She has four enlisted performance reports with overall ratings of 2,4,5, and 5.
The Respondent’s awards and decorations includes National Defense Service Medal and Air
Force Training Ribbon.
4. RESPONDENT’S CASE: The Respondent consulted counsel and waived her right to
submit statements in her behalf.
5. CHARACTERIZATION OF SERVICE: If you determine there are sufficient grounds to
discharge the Respondent, you must decide whether she should be retained or discharged. The
mental health diagnosis warrants her discharge. Pursuant to AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.1 1.1, an
airman found to have a mental disorder can be discharged if there is a mental health report
indicating the disorder significantly interferes with continued military service. Based upon the
information contained in the file, the Respondent’s ability to adapt and function in the military is
indeed significantly impaired by her Adjustment Disorder and Schizoid Personality Disorder. It
is evident from the report the Respondent’s continued service will be significantly impaired by
Global Power for America
the severity of her disorders. If you choose to separate the Respondent, you must characterize her
service as honorable. No other service characterization is authorized. Probation and
rehabilitation is authorized in this case in accordance with AFI 36-3208, Chapter 7. However,
given the mental health report, it does not appear likely she would be able to adapt to and
satisfactorily perform in the military.
6. OPTIONS: As the Separation Authority you may:
a. Discharge the Respondent with an honorable service characterization, with or without
probation and rehabilitation; or
b. Retain the Respondent.
7. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend you discharge the Respondent with an honorable
service characterization, without probation and rehabilitation. If you elect any of the other
options, please return the package to this office. If you have any questions, please call Capt
t 228-5242.
Staff Judge Advocate
Lt Col, USAF
Attachment :
Case File
,
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
355"' COMMUNICATIONS SQUADRON (ACC)
DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, ARIZONA
MEMORANDUM FOR S
FROM: CC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
a
355 cs
U
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for conditions that
interfere with military service, specifically mental disorders. The authority for this action is
AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.1 1.1. If my recommendation is approved, your
service will be characterized as honorable.
2. My reason for this action is that on or about 1 Jun 99, you were diagnosed with an Adjustment
Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood and a Schizoid Personality Disorder that
significantly impair your ability to function effectively in the military.
3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are
discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible
for reenlistment in the Air Force and will probably be denied enlistment in any component of the
armed forces and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may be subject to
recoupment.
4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel, Capt
3rd floor, west end, extension
scheduled for you to consult him on
counsel, you have the right to
building 35 10,
to assist you. An appointment has been
at 0800 hours. In addition to military
at your own expense.
5. You have the right to submit statements in
separation authority to consider must reach
extension for good cause shown. I wiu
-
Any statements you want the
and receive an
6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to the Physical Exams
Office of the Aeromedical
for the
o m 0
examination. 433
G l o b a l Power For America
on b 9 99
8. You have been scheduled for an initial outprocessing briefing. You must report to the
//o('Jh,-s
Military Personnel Flight (MPF), Separations Element, Bldg 3200, Rm 14, at
for the outprocessing briefing.
9. Any personal information you fbmish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208, is available for your use at the Area Defense Counsel's office, bldg 3510.
IO. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
Attachments:
1. Medical Statement, 9 Jun 99
2. Airman's Receipt of Notification Letter
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0276
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0276 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the RE Code. The records indicated the applicant received a Memorandum For Record for his statement concerning drug use and a Letter of Reprimand for wrongfully using drugs. After said actions were taken,: I then submited the attached letter of rebuttal.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0276
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0276 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the RE Code. The records indicated the applicant received a Memorandum For Record for his statement concerning drug use and a Letter of Reprimand for wrongfully using drugs. After said actions were taken,: I then submited the attached letter of rebuttal.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0230
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pyq9_qo30 GENERAL, The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated applicant received four Letters of Reprimand for failure to go; failure to report personnel involved with drugs; driving without proper vehicle registration and insurance; and drinking while underage, Also, he received five Records of Individual Counseling for failure to attend a mandatory briefing; sleeping while on duty;...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0485
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PACIFIC AIR FORCES MEMORANDUM FOR SRAi .......................................... ........................................... 1 25 ASOS 11 Jul 01 FROM: 25 ASOSICC SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum - Addendum 1. Since I initially notified you, additional information has been obtained that supports your discharge for mental conditions that interfere with military service. b. I have been given an appointment to consult military counsel.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0275
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL [YES | No | xX VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x Pe x xX xX a x ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A94.05 A67.10 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 2 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0051
However the Board found it inappropriate to characterize the applicant's Reason for discharge as a Personality Disorder, when in fact, his diagnosis is Adjustment Disorder. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMKNT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former 2LT) (HGH 2LT) 1. He was assigned t6 Nellis AFB, NV on or about 12 Oct 99.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00425
Her misconduct included an Article 15 for false certification of AF Form 3616, Daily Record of Facility Operation, and failing to remain awake and alert while on duty and one Letter of Reprimand for willfully attempting to avoid deployment. For this misconduct, you received an Article 15 dated 18 Oct 02. For this misconduct, you received an LOR dated 30 Oct 01.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0133
Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0133 : DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD ~ a (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) a 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable and Change the Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: My separation from the United States Air Force was for drug abuse. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00071
Nonetheless, in view of the relatively minor nature of the applicant’s misconduct when juxtaposed with his previous excellent duty performance, the Board concluded that the applicant’s then existing and continued mental health issues provided sufficient mitigation to warrant the upgrade of the applicant’s discharge characterization and reason. In this case, misconduct is the primary basis for the recommended discharge. [am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0289
Statement to Air Force Discharge Review Board. On 19 October 1992, she was derelict in the performance of her duties by improper use of a seatbelt; AF Form 174, dated 22 October 1992. c. On 16 October 1992, she disobeyed a lawful order from a senior noncommissioned officer; AF Form 174, dated 19 October 1992. d. On 24 September 1992, she was in violation of AFR 125-14, Base Supplement 1, by failing to stop for a posted stop sign; DD Form 1408, Armed Forces Traffic Ticket, dated 24 September...