Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2013-00605
Original file (bc-2013-00605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00605
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was recommended for a BSM; however, it was never awarded or 
presented due to an administrative error.  

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of AF 
Form 642, Recommendation for Decoration; AF Form 11, Officer 
Military Record; an Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) 
citation, and various other documents associated with his 
request.  

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 1 Aug 69, he retired from the Air Force after serving 
26 years, 3 months and 24 days of active service.  

The BSM is awarded to a person in any branch of the military 
service, who, while serving in any capacity with the Armed 
Forces of the United States after 6 Dec 41, shall have 
distinguished himself or herself by heroic or meritorious 
achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial 
flight, in connection with military operations against an armed 
enemy.  The award recognizes acts of heroism performed in ground 
combat if they are of lesser degree than required for the Silver 
Star.  It also recognizes single acts of merit and meritorious 
service if the achievement or service is of a lesser degree than 
that deemed worthy of the Legion of Merit (LOM); but such 
service must have been accomplished with distinction. 

DPSID was able to verify that the applicant should have been 
awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC 
w/P) during his service from 31 Mar 43 to 31 Jul 69. DPSOR will 
administratively correct his records.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force which is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial.  DPSID states that they were 
unable to locate any official documentation verifying the 
applicant was approved for award of the BSM.  

DPSID states that the applicant’s submission was not requested 
in a timely manner as over 47 years have passed since the 
recommendation for award of the BSM was initiated.  In addition, 
DPSID states the merits of the applicant’s achievements do not 
warrant consideration of the BSM.  As his request does not 
contain a proposed citation or any eyewitness statements; which 
at this point any eyewitness statement accounts would be 
questionable due to the passage of time.  The applicant provided 
poor copies of a BSM recommendation and narrative dated 1 Sep 
67, for the BSM for outstanding achievement from 27 Sep 66 to 
1 Sep 67, while stationed in Thailand.  The documentation has 
the name, grade, and duty title of the individual initiating the 
recommendation; however, the recommendation the applicant 
provided was never physically signed; therefore, it does not 
appear that it was ever placed into official channels due to 
lack of signature on the recommendation and narrative.  

DPSID’s impression is that the BSM was denied as the timeframe 
of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) is overlapped and 
written in a general way that could encompass the merits to 
which the BSM recommendation attempted to distinguish.  

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 Apr 13, for review and comment (Exhibit D).  As 
of this date, this office has not received a response. 

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we do not find any official 
documentation to show that he was awarded the BSM.  Therefore, 
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale 
expressed as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  In view of the above 
and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis 
to recommend granting further relief in this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number    
BC-2013-00605 in Executive Session on 19 Nov 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

				Panel Chair
				Member
				Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 24 Jan 23 {sic}, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 22 Apr 13.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 May 13.




								
								Panel Chair

2


3


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01200

    Original file (BC-2013-01200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the BSM and AM indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There was no official documentation in the applicant’s military personnel records to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01359

    Original file (BC 2014 01359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, below the grade of Colonel and foreign military personnel, who, while serving in any capacity with the Department of the Air Force after 28 Mar 58, distinguished themselves by outstanding achievement or meritorious service. The original award approval authority determined the AFCM was the appropriate award to recognize the applicant's outstanding achievement on 22 Mar 75. A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02353

    Original file (BC 2014 02353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02353 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), First Oak Leaf Cluster (1BOLC) for his outstanding achievement on 16 Mar 70. While the applicant provided a copy the citation for award of the AFCM (1BOLC), his entitlement to it could not be verified. THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03719

    Original file (BC 2013 03719.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per AFM 900-3, Decorations, Service Awards, Unit Awards, Special Badges, Favorable Communications, Certificates, and Special Devices (20 Jan 72), Chapter 3, Paragraph 3-1(3), “Only one decoration may be awarded for the same act, achievement or period of service.” Further, per AFM 900-3, and AFI 36-2803, Air Force Awards and Decorations Program, criteria for award of the BSM is for “Heroic or meritorious achievement or service (not involving aerial flight).” The complete MRBP evaluation is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05644

    Original file (BC 2013 05644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also recognizes single acts of merit and meritorious service if the achievement or service is of a lesser degree than that deemed worthy of the Legion of Merit (LOM); but such service must have been accomplished with distinction. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force Offices of Primary Responsibility (OPRs) and adopt their rationale as the basis for our...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03187

    Original file (BC 2014 03187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His father’s service record be corrected to reflect the award of the following Air Force Medals: a. The service member’s WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge, and DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects the following Decorations, Citations and Badges: - Basic Munition Badge - American Service Medal - Good Conduct Medal - Asiatic Pacific Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars -...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01060

    Original file (BC 2014 01060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 Dec 66, the former service member was transferred from the NY ANG to the Air Force Reserve. There is no official documentation in the decedent's record, nor did the next of kin provide any with this request, to verify the decedent was recommended for or awarded the DFC or the BSM, w/1BOLC. The DFC may be awarded to any persons who, after 6 Apr 17, while serving in any capacity with the United States Armed Forces, distinguish themselves by heroism or extraordinary achievement while...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02456

    Original file (BC 2014 02456.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The DMSM will not be awarded for any period of service for which a Military Department medal is awarded. The applicant was recommended for a DMSM, not a BSM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04973

    Original file (BC 2013 04973.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the AFCM, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00771

    Original file (BC 2014 00771.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00771 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the following: Air Force (AF) Combat Action Medal (CAM); Good Conduct Medal (GCM); Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V); Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVGC w/P); Purple Heart...