Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-02646
Original file (BC-2013-02646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02646
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be paid for the leave he accrued at the time of discharge. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He did not receive any pay for his accrued leave upon his 
discharge from active duty.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 24 Aug 75, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force.  

His DD Form 214, Block 27, Remarks, reflects “Leave balance not 
available at time of separation.”

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  The applicant’s DD Form 214, 
Block 22, Days Accrued Leave Paid, reflects he did not receive 
pay for accrued leave; however, the amount of leave he had 
prior to separation was not annotated on his DD Form 214.  

DPSIM states they were unable to determine how much leave the 
applicant had prior to his separation or how much money he was 
entitled to.

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 7 Mar 14, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has not received a 
response.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record and careful 
consideration of the applicant's contentions, we are not 
persuaded that he has been the victim of an error or injustice.  
Although the applicant's contends that he did not receive any 
pay for his accrued leave, he has not provided sufficient 
evidence to show that he was entitled to the pay he is 
requesting.  Therefore, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility and adopt its rationale as basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an 
error or injustice.  Absent persuasive evidence that he was 
denied rights to which he was entitled, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered BC-2013-02646 in 
Executive Session on 24 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

			Chair
			Member
      Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02646 was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 May 13, w/atch.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 12 Feb 14.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Mar 14




		
		Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05157

    Original file (BC 2013 05157.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be paid for the leave he accrued at the time of discharge. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of Military Payment Certificates (MPCs), his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, and a copy of a cigarette lighter with Vietnam inscribed on it. A complete copy of the DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03555

    Original file (BC 2013 03555.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03555 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, be corrected to amend Block 16, Days Accrued Leave Paid, to reflect “60” rather than “0.” ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00901

    Original file (BC-2013-00901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00901 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The sixty (60) days of leave he sold at the time of his reenlistment be rescinded. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his AF Form 1089, Leave Settlement Option; DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00425

    Original file (BC 2014 00425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIM states the applicant’s DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, reflects he was not paid for days of accrued leave. The DD Form 214 also states the accrued leave balance was not available at time of separation. See your financial services office for detailed information on payment of accrued leave.” IAW the applicant’s DD Form 214, the applicant did not receive pay for accrued leave, but the amount of leave the applicant had prior to separation was not annotated on his DD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03470

    Original file (BC-2011-03470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03470 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be corrected to reflect the following: a. Block 12b, Separation Date This Period to reflect a date of separation (DOS) of “24 Aug 82” rather than “12 Aug 82.” b. The complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05726

    Original file (BC-2012-05726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The guidance states “members are ineligible for SLA when the following precludes using leave: Normal PCS moves and TDYs.” AFI 36-3003, also states in paragraph 4.1.5., “unit commanders: advise members who schedule “use or lose” leave in August...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01018

    Original file (BC 2014 01018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He filed an appeal through the comptroller squadron which was denied stating that he was only authorized to carry over 75 days of accrued leave for the fiscal year. Member’s failure to use leave, as accruing can result in loss of accrued leave at FY-end leave balancing or upon retirement or separation from active duty.” When the applicant did not use his 10 days of annual leave prior to retiring, he forfeited those days. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03476

    Original file (BC 2013 03476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since the applicant sold the maximum 60 days of leave previously, he is ineligible to sell his 42 days of lost leave in conjunction with his 1 Dec 2012 retirement. Although he was paid for 60 days of accrued leave in conjunction with his 1 Jul 1995 retirement, the evidence reflects that he was recalled to active duty in Jul 2009 under the Rated Officer Recall Program and retired again on 1 Dec 2012. Therefore, in the interest of justice we recommend the applicant’s Extended Active Duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03634

    Original file (BC-2012-03634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIM states that the applicant provided a letter from DFAS, dated 2 Aug 2012, stating that a re-audit of his account revealed that he was entitled to sell 29.5 days of leave due to late posting of his terminal leave and due to being AWOL for one day on 25 Jan 2011. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 2 Jan 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jan 2013.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02152

    Original file (BC 2014 02152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02152 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid for 45 days of leave that he had accrued prior to being discharged. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends...