Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01926
Original file (BC-2013-01926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01926
	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In 1972-1973, while assigned to Bien Hoa Air Base, Vietnam he 
was injured during a rocket attack.  He is currently 340 [sic] 
percent disabled and the injury to his back occurred during the 
rocket attack.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former enlisted member of the Regular Air 
Force, who served on active duty from 26 Nov 1969 through 15 Sep 
1973.

In accordance with AFM 900-3, during the period in question, the 
PH was awarded for wounds received in action against an enemy, 
or as a direct result of an act of any enemy, opposing armed 
force, or hostile foreign force.  For the purpose of considering 
award of the PH, a wound was defined as an injury to any part of 
the body from an outside force or agent.  A physical lesion was 
not required, provided the concussion or other form of injury 
received was due to direct enemy, opposing armed force, or 
hostile foreign force action.

In the applicant’s DD Form 149, Application for Correction of 
Military Records, he requests that his service records be 
reviewed, to include medical and attached documents; however, no 
documents were submitted with his application.

________________________________________________________________



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial.  DPSID states that after a 
thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel 
record there are no documents indicating he was recommended for 
or awarded the PH.  To award the PH would be contrary to the 
criteria established by DoDM 1348.33, Manual of Military 
Decorations and Awards.

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 5 Jul 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the PH 
criteria in effect at the time of the applicant’s injury, we are 
not persuaded that he has met his burden of proving that he 
should be entitled to the PH.  In this respect, we note the 
applicant has failed to provide sufficient evidence that he was 
injured in action against an enemy, or as a direct result of an 
act of any enemy.  The applicant’s personal sacrifice and 
unselfish service to our Nation are duly noted; however, without 
documentation to substantiate that he meets either of these 
prerequisite eligibility requirements for entitlement to the PH, 
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 30 Jan 2014, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2013-01926:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Apr 2013.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID dated 21 Jun 2013.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR dated, 5 Jul 2013




								
								Panel Chair




2



3





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03374

    Original file (BC-2012-03374.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Each request is considered based on the policies and criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the determination is dependent on the documentary evidence presented. Furthermore, a review of his medical record reveals the applicant received medical treatment in 1970 for injuries he sustained due to a rocket attack in Bien Hoa AB, Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00035

    Original file (BC-2013-00035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board should consider his request and award him the PH because he heard of a few guys who received the PH and did not have an injury. The applicant's request cannot be considered by the PH Review Board unless there is a detailed personal account of how the injury occurred, medical documentation substantiating treatment was received, and eyewitness statements. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02379

    Original file (BC 2013 02379.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While the applicant has presented recent medical documentation indicating a shrapnel injury to his knee, he has presented no evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03961

    Original file (BC 2013 03961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends disapproval for the award of the PH Medal, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant did not provide any documentation substantiating he received an injury...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01621

    Original file (BC-2012-01621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01621 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. The applicant’s medical records indicate the injury was due to an accident. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03896

    Original file (BC 2013 03896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03896 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). The PH Review Board has the authority (on behalf of the Secretary of the Air Force (SECAF)), to determine a veteran's award of the PH. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04989

    Original file (BC-2011-04989.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04989 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. A physical lesion was not required, provided the concussion or other form of injury received was due to direct enemy, opposing armed force, or hostile foreign force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02013

    Original file (BC 2014 02013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02013 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal and the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03062

    Original file (BC-2012-03062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit c. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, as the decedent’s record does not contain evidence to support award of the PH. There were no medical documents reflecting that he sustained an injury caused by an enemy and received medical attention for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03043

    Original file (BC 2014 03043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When he returned from deployment, he received additional X-rays and an MRI for his right leg and left shoulder. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has twice applied to the United States Air Forces Central...