Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01729
Original file (BC-2013-01729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01729
		COUNSEL: NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reentry (RE) code of “3A” which denotes “First-Term Airmen 
who separates prior to completing 36 months (60 months for 6-
year enlistee) on current enlistment” be changed to allow him to 
enlist in the Wisconsin Air National Guard (ANG). 

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty is preventing him from enlisting in the ANG because the 
character of service reflects “uncharacterized.”

He does not believe his record is in error.  He is seeking 
administratve relief to modify the current character of service 
to allow him to enlist in the ANG.  

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Form 214 and a letter from the Portage County Veterans 
Services Department. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 2 Oct 12, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.  

According to AFPC/DPSOR, the available evidence of record 
reflects the following:

On 17 Dec 12, the applicant’s first day of training, he failed 
the initial Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) Preparatory Course 
Physical Ability and Stamina Test (PAST) by completing 3 of the 
required 6 pull-ups and 30 of the required 40 push-ups.  

On 18 Jan 13, after being washed back, he again failed the push-
up portion of the TACP PAST test by completing 35 of the 
required 40 push-ups.  

The applicant was counseled on his PAST failure and reminded 
that a second PAST failure from a wash back was grounds for 
elimination from TACP.  

On 1 Mar 13, the commander notified the applicant that he was 
being discharged from the Air Force for entry-level performance 
or conduct under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative 
Separation of Airmen.  The reason for the proposed action was 
the applicant’s failure to make satisfactory progress in a 
required training program.  

The applicant acknowledged receipt of the discharge 
notification; advised of his right to consult with legal counsel 
and to submit a statement in his own behalf. 

The base legal office reviewed the case and found it to have 
been properly proceesed in accordance with the notification 
procedures.  On 20 Sep 10, the discharge authority approved the 
separation.

On 27 Mar 13, the applicant received an uncharacterized entry-
level separation, with a separation code of JGA which denotes 
“Entry Level Performace or Conduct” and was issued an RE code of 
3A.  He served on active duty for a period of 5 months and 
26 days.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial.  Based on the documentation on 
file in the master personnel records, the discharge was 
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of 
the discharge regulation and within the discretion of the 
discharge authority.  The applicant did not provide any evidence 
that an error or injustice occurred in the discharge processing.

The applicant was counseled and afforded the opportunity to 
overcome his academic deficiencies.

Airmen are given entry-level separation/uncharacterized service 
when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous 
active service.  The Department of Defense (DoD) determined if a 
member served less than 180 days continuous active service, it 
would be unfair to the member and the service to characterize 
their limited service. Therefore, his uncharacterized character 
of service, is correct and in accordance with DoD and Air Force 
instructions.

The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________







APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 7 Jun 13, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has received no 
response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contention, we are not persuaded that he has been 
the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, we agree with 
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for 
our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or injustice.  In view of the above and in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in the application. 

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number    
BC-2013-01729 in Executive Session on 27 Jan 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

				Panel Chair
				Member
				Member









The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-01729 was considered:  

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 13, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Available Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 20 May 13.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jun 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00762

    Original file (BC 2014 00762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00762 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment (RE) code of “3A” which denotes “First-term airman [involuntary separated](entry-level) for inability to satisfactorily progress in a required training program without characterization of service; or a first-term airman [involuntary separated] for failure to progress in military training required to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03566

    Original file (BC 2013 03566 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03566 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Unsatisfactory Performance) and the separation code of JHJ be removed or changed. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA notes that although the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03296

    Original file (BC-2012-03296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Air Force personnel “confirmed” that he would receive a medical discharge within six months and rejoin the Air Force. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his RE code. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the applicant be corrected to show that he was discharged on 27 February...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00582

    Original file (BC 2014 00582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Will be administratively corrected) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an honorable discharge and requests that he be provided more favorable separation and RE codes. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code “2C” is erroneous and will administratively correct his record to reflect RE code “3A” which denotes “First-term Airman [involuntarily separated] {entry level} for inability to satisfactorily progress in a required training program without characterization of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03997

    Original file (BC-2011-03997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03997 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code be changed from a 2C, which denotes “Involuntary separation with honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service”, to one that will allow him to reenlist. On 12 May 11, the applicant was notified...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04729

    Original file (BC 2013 04729.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04729 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without service characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04905

    Original file (BC-2012-04905 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSOR recommends that his narrative reason for separation be changed from “Convenience of the Government” to “Unsatisfactory Performance.” The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his RE code to a “1.” DPSOA states that on 28 Aug 2012, his commander approved his involuntary discharge with an honorable character of service for failure to progress in military training required to be qualified for service with the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01392

    Original file (BC 2014 01392.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Airmen are given entry-level separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service. Airmen separated under this provision are not updated to a RE code of 2C.” In addition, DPSOY will provide the applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE code of 3A, unless otherwise directed by the Board. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00287

    Original file (BC 2013 00287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RE code of 2C is the correct RE code based upon the applicant’s involuntary discharge with honorable [sic] character of service. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation for an Entry Level Separation (ELS) with uncharacterized character of service, the applicant’s RE code of 2C was required in accordance with AF Instruction 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00287

    Original file (BC-2013-00287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RE code of 2C is the correct RE code based upon the applicant’s involuntary discharge with honorable [sic] character of service. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation for an Entry Level Separation (ELS) with uncharacterized character of service, the applicant’s RE code of 2C was required in accordance with AF Instruction 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, and the...