Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01015
Original file (BC-2013-01015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01015
	 		COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 11 May 12, be removed from the 
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a negative side effect to the medication he was taking at 
the time of his test.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, and copies of a letter from his primary care provider 
and an unsigned memorandum from his squadron commander.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of staff sergeant.  

The applicant’s last seven FA scores are as follows:

	DATE	SCORE

	28 Jun 13	EXCELLENT
	 5 Apr 13	UNSATISFACTORY
	21 Sep 12	SATISFACTORY
*	11 May 12	UNSATISFACTORY
	14 Oct 11	SATISFACTORY
	18 Mar 11	EXCELLENT
	19 Nov 10	SATISFACTORY

*Contested FA scores.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states that the evidence 
provided is insufficient to support the applicant’s claim.  The 
applicant did not get his unit commander to sign the memorandum 
indicating his decision to invalidate the FA.

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 8 Nov 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).  
As of this date, this office has received no response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number    
BC-2013-01015 in Executive Session on 17 Dec 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member



The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number 
BC-2013-01015 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Jan 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 20 Sep 13, w/atch.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Nov 13.




				Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00377

    Original file (BC 2013 00377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 October 2013 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we see no evidence of error or impropriety in the physical fitness assessment (FA) and subsequent FA score. We note...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00694

    Original file (BC 2013 00694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00694 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His demotion from the grade of Technical Sergeant (TSgt/E-6) to the grade of Staff Sergeant (SSgt/E-5) be rescinded. The applicant’s most recent FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 4 Apr 13 87.25 Satisfactory 21 Jun...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00561

    Original file (BC-2013-00561.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 Nov 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicant’s request to remove his FA dated 13 Dec 12. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 13.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03078

    Original file (BC 2013 03078.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A list of the applicant’s last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 19 Aug 13 88.75 Exempt Satisfactory 13 May 13 35.60 15:45/0.00 Exempt 8 Nov 12 92.00 Exempt Excellent 14 Aug 12 28.80 18:01/0.00 Unsatisfactory 16 Feb 12 91.75 Exempt Excellent *26 Nov 11 42.30 16:49/8.30 Unsatisfactory *26 Jul 11 35.70 18:52/0.00 Unsatisfactory 31 Jan 11 84.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Nov 10 27.50 Incomplete/0.00 Unsatisfactory 24 May 10 78.00 13:11/36.00 Good *Contested FA On 14...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550

    Original file (BC 2013 01550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01782

    Original file (BC 2013 01782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Exhibit C) ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. The AFI does not require the commander’s approval for early testing while on the 42-day acclimatization period from deployment. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 13.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05596

    Original file (BC 2012 05596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessments (FA), dated 11 Jun 12 and 6 Sep 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While we note the applicant’s stated request to have the entire FA removed, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01340

    Original file (BC 2013 01340.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 01 Apr 2013 85.00 Satisfactory 11 Oct 2012 100.00 Excellent *10 Aug 2012 81.00 Unsatisfactory 15 Feb 2012 95.75 Excellent 17 Jun 2011 86.00 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 24 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence to support contention.” In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235

    Original file (BC 2013 03235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00433

    Original file (BC 2013 00433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...