Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00961
Original file (BC-2013-00961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00961

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to reflect he elected immediate annuity for spouse only coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She witnessed when her late husband signed and mailed the ARPC Form 123, Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, designating her as beneficiary.  Yet, the system has him annotated as a non-respondent.  They were married for 39 years and have always spoken of her being the recipient of his retirement benefits upon his demise.  

She made several inquiries in regards to the decedent’s elected survivor benefits, only to be told each time that she was not eligible due to his type of retirement.  She just recently was made aware that she could have his records corrected.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 14 March 1994, the applicant was relieved from his reserve assignment and transferred to the Retired Reserve to await reserve retired pay at age 60.  

On 3 February 2008, the decedent passed away at 57 years of age.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the decedent was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP by certified mail which he acknowledged on 11 February 1994.  He made no election and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Defer to make election until age 60.”  Although the applicant indicated the decedent made a valid RCSBP election and returned the ARPC Form 123, there is no record of his submission.  There were also open enrollment seasons during 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2001 and 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006 in which the decedent could have upgraded his election.  However, there is no record that he elected participation in RCSBP during either timeframe.  In view of the fact the decedent was eligible for retired pay at age 60, the applicant is eligible for an Identification Card, Base-Exchange and Commissary privileges.  She is also eligible to apply for medical and dental benefits through the TRICARE program.  In addition, she also may be eligible for benefits through the Veterans Administration.  

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3 May 2013 for review and comments within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.  

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00961 in Executive Session on 7 November 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 February 2013, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 17 April 2013.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 May 2013.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00961

    Original file (BC 2013 00961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She made several inquiries in regards to the decedent’s elected survivor benefits, only to be told each time that she was not eligible due to his type of retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the decedent was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02769

    Original file (BC 2013 02769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW U.S.C., Title 10, Subsection 1448(a)(2)(B), “A person who is eligible to participate in the plan and who is married or has a dependent child when he is notified that he has completed the years of service required for eligibility for reserve-component retired pay, and elects to participate in the plan by designation before the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date he receives such notification.” DPTT’s system confirms the applicant reported her husband’s death to ARPC on 28 March...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00112

    Original file (BC 2014 00112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records indicate that he did not elect to participate during these timeframes. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 September 2014.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03261

    Original file (BC 2013 03261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Congress declared two RCSBP Open Enrollment Seasons from 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000 and 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05388

    Original file (BC 2013 05388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her deceased husband and she thought they had complied with the marriage reporting requirements of the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), when their marriage data was entered in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) upon being issued new military ID cards on 4 Feb 11, less than two months after being married on 16 Dec 10. ARPC/DPTT has no record of the deceased member or his spouse reporting the marital change within the required...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04887

    Original file (BC 2013 04887.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04887 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late spouse’s record be changed to show he elected spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). On 22 February 2000, APPLICANT, submitted a timely and effective claim for a survivor benefit annuity. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 May 2014.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00973

    Original file (BC-2012-00973.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPTT states that in view of the fact that the decedent would have been eligible for retired pay at age 60, the applicant is eligible for an Identification Card and Base-Exchange and Commissary privileges effective 6 March 2000. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03586

    Original file (BC-2012-03586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03586 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased spouse’s record be corrected to reflect he elected immediate annuity spousal coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). He completed the ARPC Form 123, RCSBP Certificate, and elected Option A, “Decline to make an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00793

    Original file (BC-2011-00793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Aug 1994, the decedent and the applicant divorced. If the documents were provided within the required timeframe, DPTT would have been unable to update the member's RCSBP election due to the member not electing to participate in the Plan when eligible. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In further support of her request, the applicant provides two letters.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05023

    Original file (BC 2013 05023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPTT states they should have given the former service member an opportunity to correct the ARPC Form 123 he submitted at the time he made his election. Title 10 Subsection 1448 (a) (3) (A) and Section IX on the form, “A married person who is eligible to provide standard annuity may not without the concurrence of the person’s spouse elect not to participate in the Plan.” ARPC failed to notify the service member to make corrections and updated his election in error. Exhibit F. Affidavits,...