Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00491
Original file (BC-2013-00491.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                  DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00491

			                             COUNSEL:  NONE

			                             HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His 26 May 11 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The contested FA was incomplete and even though he immediately 
went to the emergency room for evaluation, his commander still 
authorized his score to be entered into the AFFMS within the 
five day requirement.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of staff sergeant (E-5).

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine 
overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness 
score and minimum scores per three component areas:  Aerobic 
Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal 
circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of 
push-ups and sit-ups completed within one minute each).  
Military members receive a composite score on a 0 to 100 scale 
based on the following maximum component scores: 60 points for 
aerobic, 20 points for body composition, 10 points for push-ups 
and 10 points for sit-ups.  To determine individual composite 
fitness scores the Air Force uses age and gender specific 
fitness score charts.  An unsatisfactory is a composite score 
less than 75 and/or one or more component minimums are not met.

On 26 May 11, the applicant participated in the contested FA, 
attaining a composite score of 34.90.  He did not complete the 
cardio component due to an unforeseen illness during the FA.
On 3 Jun 11, according to documentation provided by the 
applicant, an AF Form 781, Multiple Item Prescription, was 
issued indicating the applicant was seen after having chest 
pains while performing the FA.  The physician indicated that he 
feels the applicant should be able to retest.

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, AFGM 2, paragraph 13, “if the 
medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit 
Commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then 
be required to retest within five duty days or when capable 
based on the recommendations of the medical provider/MLO and the 
Exercise Physiologist.  If an AF Form 422 is required, an 
additional seven days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be 
generated and provided.”

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the evidence provided 
by the applicant does not conclusively support his contention.  
The applicant provided documentation indicating he was seen for 
chest pain and should be able to retake the FA; however, he has 
not provided documentation indicating his condition precluded 
him from achieving a passing score.  Furthermore, there is no 
supporting documentation from the applicant’s commander 
indicating his/her decision to invalidate the contested FA.  

According to AFI 36-2905, AFGM 2, paragraph 13, “If an Airman 
becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete 
all required components, he/she will have the option of being 
evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her 
test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit 
Commander.”

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, 
is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 18 Oct 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  
While the applicant has provided documentation indicating that 
he sought medical care for chest pain associated with the 
contested FA, other than his own assertions, he has provided no 
evidence that would indicate that his commander’s subsequent 
decision to allow the FA score to be enterd into his record was 
somehow erroneous or constituted an abuse of authority.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00491 in Executive Session on 23 Jan 14, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	                     , Panel Chair
	                     , Member
	                     , Member

?
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00491 was considered:

	 Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 Jan 13, w/atchs.
	 Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	 Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 17 Sep 13, w/atchs.
	 Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Oct 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair




2


DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 
WASHINGTON DC 

5






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00667

    Original file (BC-2013-00667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provided a letter from his commander, dated 27 Dec 13, stating upon reviewing the applicant’s records and the memorandum from the doctor, he supports the applicant’s request to have the contested FA invalidated (Exhibit E). While the majority notes the applicant has obtained a supporting statement from his commander in response to the Air Force advisory opinion, we do not find this statement sufficient to conclude that his fitness assessment (FA) results should have been invalidated...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01465

    Original file (BC 2013 01465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01465 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00822

    Original file (BC 2013 00822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Jul 13 85.40 Satisfactory 1 Feb 13 75.33 Satisfactory *19 Dec 12 32.50 Unsatisfactory 7 Jun 12 83.50 Satisfactory 29 Feb 12 38.10 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550

    Original file (BC 2013 01550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538

    Original file (BC 2013 02538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe;” Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01195

    Original file (BC 2013 01195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 Feb 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and received a composite score of 68.00 resulting in an unsatisfactory fitness score. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 23 Sep 2013 88.50 Satisfactory 28 Mar 2013 94.67 Excellent *22 Feb 2013 68.00 Unsatisfactory 23 Aug 2013 88.10 Satisfactory 02 Feb 2013 100.00 Excellent * Contested FA On 15 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04056

    Original file (BC-2012-04056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence provided by the applicant did not include medical provider recommended exemptions for the cardio component. If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02580

    Original file (BC 2013 02580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A list of the applicant’s complete FA history is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 4 Aug 2013 33.00 17:41/0.00 Unsatisfactory *5 May 2013 26.50 INC/0.00 Unsatisfactory 14 May 2012 91.70 12:19/57.60 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01174

    Original file (BC 2013 01174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01174 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 14 July 2011, 02 Feb 2012, and 31 Mar 2012 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite...