AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02663
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC).
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In late 1962 his unit deployed to Florida to support other
units during the missile crisis.
The PUC was presented to his unit for participation in the
missile crisis.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Regular Air Force from 6 Mar
1961 to 24 Apr 1964.
The PUC is conferred on units of the Armed Forces of the United
States and of cobelligerent nations, for extraordinary heroism
in action against an armed enemy on or after 7 Dec 1941.
The unit must display such gallantry, determination, and esprit
de corps in accomplishing its mission as to set it apart from
and above other units participating in the same campaign.
The degree of heroism required is the same that which would
warrant award of the Distinguished Service Cross to an
individual.
An individual assigned or permanently attached to, and also
present for duty with, a unit in the action for which the PUC
is awarded may wear the emblem as a permanent part of their
uniform.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. DPSID states the applicant's
only unit of assignment was w i t h the 27th Armament and
Electronics Maintenance Squadron from 21 Feb 1962 to 24 Apr
1964. After a thorough review of Air Force Pamphlet 36-2801,
Unit Decorations, Awards, and Campaign Credits, DPSID was
unable to verify award of the PUC during his tenure with that
squadron.
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 11 Sep 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by
this office (Exhibit D).
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation
primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has
not been shown that a personal appearance with or without
counsel will materially add to our understanding of the
issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not
favorably considered.
_______________________________________________________________
office
Force
of
of
the
Air
2
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 14 Feb 2013, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-02663:
Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 24 May 2012.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 4 Sep 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Sep 2012.
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02663
The PUC was presented to his unit for participation in the missile crisis. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application....
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 02663
The PUC was presented to his unit for participation in the missile crisis. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Sep 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01840
The applicant's chain of command resubmitted the recommendation, however, on 22 Sep 2009, the SAFPC Awards and Decorations Board determined, that although the recommendation was commendable, it did not meet the requirements for the DFC. DPSID states the SAFPC Awards and Decorations Board has considered the request twice and disapproved/downgraded the recommendation to an AM. Regarding his request for the DFC for the Laos mission, although he and another pilot provided statements on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03900
Based on AFPC/DPSID review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were able to determine the below Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons should have been awarded during his service from 17 October 1961 to 2 February 1965 and were not reflected in his records. The applicant's active duty service is from 17 October 1961 to 2 February 1965, which would not meet the eligibility requirements for the Air Force Longevity Service Award. The Air Force Longevity Service Medal is...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03296
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to include the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and Basic Missile Occupational Badge. (Administratively Corrected) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She served at Grand Forks Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02545
Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) administratively corrected. DPSID states after a thorough review of the applicants official military personnel record, they were unable to verify award of the PUC or the AFOUA for service with the 303rd Bomb Wing, the AFEM and the VSM. However, if the applicant provided official documentation verifying service in Vietnam for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days he could elect to receive award of the VSM in lieu of the AFEM.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02530
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02530 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His late uncles records be corrected show that he was posthumously awarded two Bronze Star Medals (BSMs), and was entitled to the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), three Presidential Unit Citations (PUCs), formerly known as Distinguished Unit...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00158
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00158 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). According to the AFP 900-2, Unit Decorations, Awards and Campaign Participation, personnel assigned to the XXX Field Maintenance Squadron from 1 January 1966 through 10 October 1966; 11-12 August 1967 and 24 27 October 1967...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05470
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05470 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and any additional awards he may be entitled to for his active duty service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02506
On 19 August 2014, AFPC/DPAPP advised the applicant that after a review of his official military, they were able to verify and confirm boots on ground foreign service time at DaNang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, from 31 December 1963 to 31 December 1964, for 1 year and 1 day. Based on their review of the applicants official military personnel record, it was determined that the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P) should have been awarded during the applicants...