Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02534
Original file (BC-2012-02534.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 

 

 

 
 

DOCKET NUMBERS:  BC-2012-02534 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF:   
     
 
 
_______________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:  
 
His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 1 October 2010, be removed 
from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).   
 
_______________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
The FA Test monitor improperly administered the sit-up portion 
of the test and as a result did not count 12 of his sit-ups.   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_______________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of colonel (O-6).   
 
The  remaining  relevant  facts,  extracted  from  the  applicant’s 
military  service  record,  are  contained  in  the  evaluation 
provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at 
Exhibit C.   
 
_______________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIM  recommends  denial.    DPSIM  states  a  memorandum  was 
sent  to  the  applicant  requesting  additional  documentation.  
Specifically,  a  signed  letter  from  the  test  monitor 
acknowledging  the  improper  fitness  test  administration,  in 
particular  the  sit-up  procedures.    The  applicant  did  not 
replied.   
 
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit 
C.   
 
_______________________________________________________________ 
 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant on 28 August 2012, for review and comment within 30 
days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 
 
_______________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.    We  took 
notice  of  the  applicant's  complete  submission  in  judging  the 
merits of the case.  While the applicant contends that the sit-
up  portion  of  the  FA  test  was  improperly  administered,  we  do 
not find the evidence provided substantial to conclude that he 
did  not  receive  a  fair  FA.    Therefore,  in  the  absence  of 
evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to  recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
_______________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
_______________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-02534  in  Executive  Session  on  5  March  2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

, Panel Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

 
 
 

 

 

2

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02534: 
 

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 31 May 12, w/atchs. 
Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 Aug 12, w/atch. 
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Aug 12.  

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

  
  

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
Panel Chair 

3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05096

    Original file (BC-2012-05096.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05096 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 31 Aug 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Nov 12 88.00 Satisfactory* 31 Aug...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04713

    Original file (BC 2013 04713.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04713 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 Aug 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In this regard, the Center Director does not support the extended time permitted to take the test, but concurred...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03563

    Original file (BC-2012-03563.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01536

    Original file (BC-2012-01536.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01536 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness assessment (FA) failure dated 10 Aug 11 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The following is a summary of the applicant’s sit-up...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03485

    Original file (BC 2012 03485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, because the failed FAs resulted in the applicant receiving a referral EPR and cancellation of his promotion, to the grade of technical sergeant, we recommend the referral EPR for the period of 29 Feb 2012 to 11 Jul 2012 be declared void and removed from his records and that his promotion to the grade of technical sergeant be reinstated with a date of rank and effective date of 1 Sep 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 19 Sep 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 29...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05064

    Original file (BC 2012 05064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05064 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 5 Sep 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). When he completed his walk with the same monitor it read 170 BPM, which only gave him 21.7 points for the cardio portion, and, as a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02064

    Original file (BC 2013 02064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove FA score from AFFMS dated 28 Aug 12. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05967

    Original file (BC 2012 05967.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05967 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 30 Nov 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The medication the applicant was taking affected his heart rate, a factor that is not calculated in any FA component except the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03983

    Original file (BC 2013 03983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the FAC waited until 45 seconds into the assessment to tell the applicant to “fix her body.” She has never failed an FA before or since the contested assessment. FAC augmentee or another member paired to accomplish muscle fitness components will monitor and count the correct number of push-ups. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Mar 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05107

    Original file (BC 2012 05107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05107 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 21 Sep 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant did not provide any evidence his 1.0 mile walk was improperly administered during the FA. The 21 Sep 2012 FA was...