Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01080
Original file (BC-2012-01080.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01080 
COUNSEL:  NONE 

 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
   
  (SERVICE MEMBER DECEASED) 
 
  (APPLICANT) 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
Her  late  spouse’s  records  be  corrected  to  reflect  his  service 
connected  disability  of  coronary  artery  bypass  be  assessed  as 
combat  related  in  order  to  qualify  for  compensation  under  the 
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
Her spouse requested benefits two years prior to his death.  The 
Department  of  Veterans  Affairs  (DVA)  awarded  him  10  percent 
disability  compensation  for  diabetes.    His  disability  rating 
should have been higher than 10 percent.  He was diagnosed with 
bone marrow cancer in 2004 and congestive heart failure 2005. 
 
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of the 
former service member’s death certificate, an expanded statement, 
and documentation associated with his CRSC application. 
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On 31 May 1976, the service member separated from active service.   
 
On 7 March 2012, AFPC/DPSDC informed the applicant that her late 
spouse was not eligible for compensation under the CRSC and the 
program has no provisions for survivor benefits. 
 
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSDC recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The service member died prior to DVA 
establishing  Coronary  Artery  Bypass  as  Agent  Orange  presumptive 
condition.    Furthermore,  CRSC  does  not  have  any  provision  for 
survivor  benefits.    The  applicant’s  request  does  not  meet  the 
mandatory criteria for compensation under the CRSC program. 
 
The CRSC program was established to provide compensation certain 
retirees with combat-related disabilities that qualify under the 
criteria  set  form  in  Title  10,  U.S.C.,  Section  1414a.    If  the 
former  service  member  fails  to  satisfy  the  preliminary  CRSC 
criteria, no further consideration by their service department is 
required and the claim will be denied. 
 
Under current CRSC guidelines, the service member is required to 
meet  the  following  basic  eligibility  requirements  (a)  received 
military retirement pay, (b) have disabilities rated at least 10 
percent by DVA, and (c) submit a signed claim for Combat-Related 
Special Compensation. 
 
In  order  for  a  disability  to  be  determined  as  combat-related, 
there must be objective documentary evidence that the disability 
is the direct result of a combat event or events or performance 
of  duty  simulating  war  or  caused  by  hazardous  service  or  an 
instrumentality of war.  In addition, there are other conditions 
that are considered presumptive of Agent Orange (AO), Radiation, 
Mustard  Gas,  or  POW  internment,  by  the  DVA  which  qualify  for 
CRSC. 
 
Coronary  Artery  Bypass  has  been  added  to  the  Agent  Orange 
presumptive  list  effective  1  November  2010  by  the  Office  of 
Secretary of Defense (OSD). 
 
The  AFPC/DPSDC  complete  evaluation,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 11 May 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, this office has received no response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 

 

2

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.  We took 
notice  of  the  applicant’s  complete  submission  in  judging  the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our  decision  the 
applicant is not the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, 
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-01080  in  Executive  Session  on  14  January  2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 March 2012, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSDC, dated 3 May 2012, w/atch. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 2012. 
 
 
 
 
 
 

      Acting Panel Chair 
     Member 
      Member 

  
Acting Panel Chair 

  
  

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04675

    Original file (BC-2011-04675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While service connection for disabilities is required for initial eligibility for CRSC consideration, CRSC criteria is more stringent and requires documentation to support a qualifying combat-related event as the “direct” cause of a disability. For hypertension to qualify for CRSC, it must be either secondary to a combat-related condition (such as diabetes or a heart condition contracted by exposure to Agent Orange) or presumptive to Prisoner of War (POW) internment and this must be so...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01818

    Original file (BC-2008-01818.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states the applicant requested his coronary artery bypass be considered combat related. For his coronary artery bypass to qualify for CRSC, it must be either secondary to diabetes mellitus contracted by exposure to AO herbicides or presumptive to Prisoner of War (POW) internment, and this must be so stated in the applicable DVA Rating Decision. ________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02815

    Original file (BC-2005-02815.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The CRSC board erroneously denied his request for CRSC because his heart condition was incorrectly addressed. Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined compensable rating of 70% for his unfitting conditions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02608

    Original file (BC-2012-02608.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02608 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be able to sign the DD Form 2860, Application For Combat – Related Special Compensation (CRSC), on behalf of her deceased husband. On 27 April 2009, according to information provided by the applicant, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) advised the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00884

    Original file (BC-2013-00884.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service connected disabilities of high blood pressure and coronary artery disease (CAD) be re-evaluated under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) program. As such, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03758

    Original file (BC-2004-03758.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03758 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Jun 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, asthma, colitis, hip prosthesis, coronary artery bypass, hypertension, varicose veins, and scars, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03158

    Original file (BC-2006-03158.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03158 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 APR 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions , diabetes mellitus, coronary artery bypass, circulatory condition, glaucoma, and hypertension, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01130

    Original file (BC-2004-01130.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 Sep 86, the Formal PEB (FPEB) found him unfit for duty with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease and hypercalciuric nephrolithiasis and recommended he be placed on the TDRL with a compensable percentage of 100%. There is little doubt his service connected medical conditions occurred while in service performing duties related to his Air Force specialty. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03225

    Original file (BC-2004-03225.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served 26 years, 6 months, and 27 days on active duty His CRSC application was disapproved on 6 Nov 03 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his ejection was in 1959, not 1968 as stated by DPPD. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01108

    Original file (BC 2014 01108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam caused his heart disease, but, they incorrectly concluded his weight was his problem without medical reason to support their finding. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFC evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Through counsel, he states he served in Vietnam (Pleiku) and was exposed to Agent Orange and was medically retired after 18 years 11 months and 23 days due to arteriosclerotic heart disease...