RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05126
(DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE
(APPLICANT) HEARING DESIRED: YES
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her deceased fathers DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United
States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect
his grade as captain (0-3), rather than first lieutenant (O-2).
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She has a letter dated 17 May 65, from Headquarters, Air Reserve
Records Center, which addresses the deceased former service
member as a captain.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 13 Mar 56, he was commissioned a first lieutenant in the Air
Force Reserve. On 12 Sep 57, he was released from active duty
in the grade of first lieutenant (O-2) and transferred to the
Air Force Reserve.
On 3 Jul 62, the deceased former service member was promoted to
the grade of captain (O-3), effective 18 Jun 61.
On 17 May 65, the deceased former member was relieved from his
assignment and honorably discharged from all appointments in the
U.S. Air Force.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or injustice. The deceased former service member was
selected for promotion to the grade of captain (O-3) after he
was discharged from active duty; therefore, his DD Form 214
appropriately reflects the grade in which he last served on
active duty as first lieutenant (O-2) and cannot be changed to
reflect the grade of captain (O-3).
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_____________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 25 Jan 13 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no
response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the deceased former
member has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-05126 in Executive Session on 18 Jul 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated, 21 Oct 12.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 7 Jan 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Jan 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04613
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04613 (DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE (APPLICANT) HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her father be posthumously promoted to the grade of captain (O-3). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00409
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00409 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of rank (DOR) to the grade of captain (O-3) be changed from 14 Jan 14 to 30 May 13. Under Reserve Appointment Order D-0719, dated 7 Aug 13, the applicant was appointed to the grade of captain with a date of appointment of 30 May 13, based upon the constructive service credit (CSC) she was awarded at that...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00213
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00213 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect: 1. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was promoted to the grade of captain and his records should indicate such. On 17 Aug 02, a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, was issued reflecting award of the PH and POW medals.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03381
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03381 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receives a retroactive promotion to the grade of captain (O-3) effective no later than his discharge on 26 Jan 1946. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit B. Moreover, the applicant has not provided substantial evidence which would persuade us...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04565
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/CV did not make a recommendation and states that the applicant has never met a USAFR promotion board and recommended a referral to AFPC to comment on the promotion deferrals. The applicant did not meet any promotion boards during the time he served in the USAFR. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02048
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 17 Oct 45, the War Department announced that officers of all Reserve Components up to the grade of colonel who had not been promoted while on active duty would be promoted to the higher grade effected on the date they go on terminal leave, provided they served on active duty for two years and had an efficiency index of 35. The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03766
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03766 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-03684
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits C, D, and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial, indicating the applicant’s DOR was originally established incorrectly by AFPC and corrected in accordance with the provisions of AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank. An audit of officer...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01299
He was progressively promoted to the grade of captain effective 26 June 1985. Once a member is placed on the TDRL, they are in a retired status and are not eligible to meet a promotion board. DPSOO states that no evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00078
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. The DPSOO complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants spouse reiterates her original contentions; however, she wants her husbands Officer Evaluation Report (OER) examined to see why he would be promoted to major below-the-zone and then...