RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04493
COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The applicant makes no contentions.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 Feb 1994, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
On 19 Dec 1994, his commander notified him he was recommending
he be discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,
Administrative Separation of Airmen, for drug abuse. The
specific reason for his action is reflected in the Notification
Memorandum at Exhibit B.
On 19 Dec 1994, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the
discharge notification.
On 5 Jan 1995, the Staff Judge Advocate found the discharge
legally sufficient.
On 11 Jan 1995, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force,
with a service characterized as under other than honorable
conditions. He served 11 months and 11 days of total active
service.
On 3 Jun 2013, a request for post-service information was
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office (Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice
that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the
available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority.
The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to
believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the
provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or
disproportionate to the offenses committed. In the interest of
justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on
clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is
sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought
on that basis. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
?
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 16 Jul 2013, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-04493:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Sep 2012, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 3 Jun 2013, w/atch.
Panel Chair
2
2
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03603
On 23 May 1994, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the discharge notification and provided a personal statement and numerous character letters. On 9 Jun 1994, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force, with a service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00659
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00659 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05334
The documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge to include her character of service and narrative reason for separation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03700
Moreover, there has been no showing that he had an unfitting medical condition that would have required his processing through the Military Disability Evaluation System a prerequisite to a medical discharge. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02919
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was informed at the time of his discharge that he was to wait at least six months and request an upgrade to an Honorable discharge. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to grant the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00654
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00654 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His record of service in the Air Force was honorable. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03048
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03048 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2B, which denotes "approved involuntary separation with less than honorable discharge," be changed to honorable. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00053
_______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for removal of the contested FAs. The applicant has failed to provide any information from the rating officials on the contested report. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00053 in Executive Session on 30 Jan 2014, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03253
On 10 Sep 1996, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force, with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). On 17 May 2002, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicants request for a discharge upgrade. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01865
On 30 Jun 2011, the applicants commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the Air Force as a result of his civilian conviction. Furthermore, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested change to his discharge characterization. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 14 Jun 2013.