Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04242
Original file (BC-2012-04242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04242 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to 
honorable. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He served his country honorably other than the one incident that 
impacted his character of service. He has lived for the past 
50 years as an upstanding citizen. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 28 January 
1957. The commander was informed that the applicant was 
involved with civil authorities for personal misconduct 
involving the theft of government property. There were no 
military charges filed against him. On 17 January 1961, the 
commander directed that he be discharged from the Air Force upon 
his normal expiration of term of service with a general 
discharge. The commander stated due to the near proximity of 
the time of personal misconduct and his expiration of term of 
service date, the applicant had not demonstrated a sufficient 
degree of rehabilitation to warrant an honorable discharge. On 
27 January 1961, the applicant was discharged upon his 
expiration of term of service with an under honorable conditions 
discharge. 

 

On 27 March 2013, a request for post-service information was 
forwarded to the applicant for response within 30 days 
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice 
that occurred during the discharge process. The applicant has 
provided no evidence, which would lead us to believe the 
characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions 
of the governing regulation, or unduly harsh. Additionally, in 
the absence of any evidence concerning his post-service 
activities, we do not find it would be in the interest of 
justice to upgrade the discharge on the basis of clemency. 
Therefore, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence 
to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend 
granting the relief sought. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04242 in Executive Session on 7 May 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Vice Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04242 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Sep 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 27 Mar 13. 

 

 

 

 Vice Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04246

    Original file (BC-2012-04246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04246 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant acknowledged his commander’s intent, his right to legal counsel, to present his case before an administrative discharge board and to submit statements on his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02693

    Original file (BC-2012-02693.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02693 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: __________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 17 November 1964, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend him for an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04232

    Original file (BC-2012-04232.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to the file being found legally sufficient, the discharge authority approved the request for discharge and directed the applicant be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. On 7 December 1998, the applicant submitted an appeal for upgrade of his discharge to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB). On 24 May 1999 the applicant was advised that since his case was denied by the AFDRB he had the right to appeal, in person, to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04490

    Original file (BC-2012-04490.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04490 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request for credit for service in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03153

    Original file (BC 2013 03153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03153 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to major (O-4) be adjusted from 1 January 2013 to 15 April 2012, his six-year anniversary date. He was selected the first time considered - In the Promotion Zone (IPZ), for promotion to major by the Calendar Year 2012 (CY12)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04579

    Original file (BC-2012-04579.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 July 2012, the applicant requested an extension to the length of time authorized to relocate because his spouse’s prognosis improved and is now able to move. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is attached at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/ECAF recommends denial, indicating the Joint...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03445

    Original file (BC-2012-03445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03445 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. He served on the usher board, men’s counsel and youth activities. He was credited with 1 year, 3 months and 12 days of active duty service.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01364

    Original file (BC-2013-01364.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to the file being found legally sufficient, the discharge authority approved the request for discharge and directed the applicant be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post- service activities. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 27 March 2012

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05721

    Original file (BC 2012 05721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05721 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05721

    Original file (BC 2012 05721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05721 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...