Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04233
Original file (BC-2012-04233.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:		DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-04233

MEMBER:  (DECEASED)	COUNSEL:  NONE
APPLICANT:  
			HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her ex-husband’s record be corrected to show that he elected 
former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), 
naming her as beneficiary.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

1.  She recently discovered that upon their divorce, her ex-
husband failed to change the SBP election designation from 
“spouse” to “former spouse”  as was required by their divorce 
agreement.  She was informed that the change from “spouse” to 
“former spouse” should have been accomplished within a year of 
their divorce. He may not have known that he had to make this 
change, as he continued the premium deductions from his pay with 
her as the beneficiary.  

2. Upon discovering the failure to change her status from 
“spouse” to “former spouse” she called the Defense Finance and 
Accounting Services (DFAS) and asked how to correct the 
omission.  She was told it was too late, as it should have been 
done within a year of their divorce.  She was then instructed to 
accomplish a DD For 149 and submit to the AFBCMR.  She has 
complied with the requirements of the divorce settlement and 
should not be penalized for her ex-husband’s omission.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Information submitted by the applicant indicates her ex-husband 
retired from the Air Force in the grade of Technical Sergeant in 
November of 1974. 

On 26 October 2012, the applicant notified SAF/MRBR that her ex-
husband died on 4 September 2012 (Exhibit B).  

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

1.  AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval.  DPFFF states the fact that 
the member did not request SBP coverage be terminated following 
his divorce indicates he intended for the applicant to remain his 
SBP beneficiary.  

2.  The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) 
reflects the member was not married when he declined SBP coverage 
prior to his 1 November 1974 retirement.  The member and the 
applicant married on 14 February 1981, and he elected spouse only 
coverage based on full retired pay under the SBP during the one-
year (1 April 1992 to 31 March 1993) open enrollment period 
authorized by Public Law (PL) 101-189 (29 November 1989).  They 
divorced on 14 January 2010, and the court order held that the 
applicant should continue as the SBP beneficiary.  There is no 
indication either party submitted an election to change spouse 
coverage to former spouse coverage within the first year following 
their divorce.  

3.  DFAS-CL's retired pay system continues to reflect the 
applicant's name and date of birth (24 December 1947) as the 
eligible spouse beneficiary.  SBP premiums continued to be 
deducted from the member's retired pay until 1 Oct 08, when he 
became "paid-up" under the provisions of PL 105-261 (17 Oct 98).  
There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, in 
the interest of justice and absent a competing claimant, they 
recommend the member's record be corrected to show the decedent 
elected SBP former spouse only coverage based on full retired pay 
effective 15 January 2010.  

The complete AFPC/DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit C.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 10 December 2012 for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  To date, a response has not been received.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  After reviewing the 
evidence of record, we are persuaded that favorable 
consideration of the applicant’s request is warranted.  Based on 
the favorable recommendation rendered by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility indicating that since the member did not 
request SBP coverage be terminated upon his divorce from the 
applicant, he intended for her to remain his SBP beneficiary.  
Therefore, in view of the above and absent a competing claimant, 
we recommend the decedent’s records be corrected as set forth 
below.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 
15 January 2010, he elected former spouse coverage under the 
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) based on full retired pay naming the 
APPLICANT as the former spouse beneficiary.  

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 17 June 2013, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603:

			, Panel Chair
			, Member
			, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR 
Docket Number BC-2012-04233:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149 dated 31 August 2012, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 14 November 2012.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 December 2012. 




                                   
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04626

    Original file (BC-2012-04626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent's record be corrected to reflect on 1 Feb 94, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. Considering the applicant failed to execute a deemed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03731

    Original file (BC 2013 03731.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The decedent elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay prior to his 1 Jul 95 retirement. There is no evidence either party submitted a valid election to change spouse to former spouse coverage within the first year following their divorce as the law requires. The complete DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit F. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant acknowledges the change to the advisory opinion to recommend the decedent’s record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04943

    Original file (BC-2012-04943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The parties divorced on 5 Jun 98, and in the Child Custody Marital Dissolution Agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, the member agreed the applicant would receive survivor benefits from his military retirement. There is no evidence of Air Force error, and absent a competing claimant, we recommend the member's record be corrected to reflect that he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay and named the applicant as the eligible former spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00338

    Original file (BC 2014 00338.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00338 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). Second, we note that the divorce decree submitted by the applicant was not final, as it was not executed by both parties and the court. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00167

    Original file (BC 2014 00167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00167 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05614

    Original file (BC 2013 05614.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on 1 Jul 87, he elected to change RCSBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the eligible beneficiary. SBP premiums were deducted from the decedent’s retired pay until his 28 Jun 11 death. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05676

    Original file (BC 2013 05676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05676 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated the beneficiary for her former spouse’s Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). As such, we find the death certificate provided by the applicant sufficient to conclude that the decedent was not married at the time of his death. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00704

    Original file (BC 2014 00704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submitted DD Form 1882, for former spouse and child coverage; however, DFAS-CL did not honor the election because it was not received until after the one-year eligibility period. However, while the applicant contends the election for former spouse coverage was made within the required time, no evidence has been provided, to our satisfaction, that she or the deceased former member submitted a valid former spouse election during the first year following their divorce. THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03921

    Original file (BC 2013 03921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends granting relief. The parties divorced on 2 Dec 04, and in the Agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, the decedent agreed to pay SBP premiums currently in place for the benefit of the applicant. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON JUL 2 2 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Docket Number: BC-2013-03921 I have carefully reviewed the AFBMCR application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02213

    Original file (BC 2013 02213.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02213 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former husband’s (decedent) records be corrected to show he made a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF...