AFBCMR BC-2012-04181
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT: XXXXXXX
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we
recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
APPLICANT, be corrected to show that, by competent authority, the debt incurred as a result of
the incorrect payment of base pay due to the adjustment of his pay date from 4 August 1984 to
22 April 1986 be, and, hereby is remitted.
The applicant has been advised of the recommended relief and agrees that it is full and
fitting.
Members of the Board, , considered this application on 23 July 2013.
Panel Chair
Attachments:
Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV dated 8 Mar 2013
Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV dated 10 May 2013
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02861
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. His service dates were verified by DPSIPV; the error in his pay date was discovered and corrected removing the credit for the time he was in ROTC. DPSIPV has corrected his DIEUS date in the MilPDS to the date he entered ROTC 28 September 1984.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03225
His time in service be corrected to reflect 1 day of active duty during the time of war. Documentation from his master personnel record reflects his pay date as 16 May 1975. The applicant has provided no documentation to support his contention that he performed for the base commander.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01911
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicants time on medical turnback was mistaken as attendance at USAFA Preparatory School, which is creditable as enlisted active...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-04043
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04043 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States, be amended to include his service in the United States Coast Guard Merchant Marines from January 1946 through December 1946 and update his total years of active service...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05388
Had she known she would have been eligible for DVA benefits after two years of service, she would have held out for four more days to qualify. On 9 May 1984, she submitted her application for early separation due to pregnancy with a requested separation date of 15 Sep 1984. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05352
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05352 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, block 12b, Separation Date This Period, be changed to reflect 27 Dec 06 rather than 6 Dec 06 [sic]. The complete DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03387
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show her Date of Enlistment (DOE) as 26 Jun 1958. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05326
However, the additional time was not credited to the applicants total active federal military service date (TAFMSD) while he was still serving on active duty as a Regular Air Force commissioned officer. Therefore, the time was not accounted for on his 30 Sep 2012, DD Form 214. They recommend reversal of the previously approved addition of two months of active duty service to the applicants 30 Sep 2004 DD Form 214 by ARPC/DPTS.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01894
According to Reserve Order BA-249 dated 19 June 2008, the applicant was promoted to the grade of captain with a DOR of 5 July 2008 in the Reserve of the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JAX recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. To obtain relief, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01381
As a result, his record was corrected to reflect an ADSC expiration date of 23 May 18 for the scholarship program. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He believes his corrected ADSC expiration date is miscalculated for the updated AF Form 63. He agrees with DPSIPVs statement, if the Boards decision is to grant the relief sought, the record will be adjusted to reflect an ADSC expiration date of 23 May 15. However, if the Boards decision is to deny relief, he requests his record be...