Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03801
Original file (BC-2012-03801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-03801
      COUNSEL: NONE
	              				HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

His reentry (RE) code of “2C – Involuntarily separated with an 
honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without 
characterization of service,” be changed to allow him to reenter 
the military.  

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Eight weeks into his Special Operations Program training, he 
lost focus, began doubting himself, and was unable to finish his 
training.  He regrets his actions and has continued to develop 
his physical, mental, and psychological attributes because he 
wants to reenlist in the military.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.  

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 February 
2011, in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 1C411, Tactical Air 
Control Party (TACP) Helper.  

The applicant was eliminated from the TACP Preparatory Course 
after failing two Physical Aptitude and Stamina Tests and 
failing to make satisfactory progress.  

On 29 October 2012, the applicant was notified of his 
commander’s intent to recommend him for an entry-level 
separation under the provisions of Air Force Program Directive 
(AFPD) 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations, and; Air 
Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208, Reenlistments in the USAF, 
Chapter 5, Section 5D (entry-level performance or conduct), 
specifically, paragraph 5.22.2.3, (failure to make satisfactory 
progress in a required training program).  The applicant 
acknowledged his commander’s intent and waived his rights to 
consult counsel and to submit statements in his own behalf.  

After the Assistant Staff Judge Advocate found the case to be 
legally sufficient, the discharge authority approved the 
recommended separation and directed the applicant be 
administratively separated with an uncharacterized entry-level 
separation.  

The applicant received an uncharacterized, entry-level 
separation effective 13 June 2011, in the grade of airman basic 
(E-1).  His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge 
from Active Duty, reflects his RE code as “2C” and a narrative 
reason for separation as “Entry Level Performance or Conduct.”  
He served four months and six days on active duty.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  DPSOA states the applicant’s RE 
Code of “2C” is required based on his entry-level separation 
with uncharacterized service.  The applicant does not provide 
evidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE Code. 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.  

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He asks the Board to please do not deny him the opportunity to 
serve his country’s Armed Forces because of the missteps brought 
about by youthful exuberance and inexperience.  He took a chance 
by “aiming high,” but unfortunately, fell short.  It is not 
right that his enthusiasm, desire, and attempt to be the “Best 
of the Best” should forever exclude him from the service.  He 
respectfully requests the Board to change his RE code from “2C” 
to a more appropriate code, which would allow him to again be 
eligible to honorably serve in the military.

The applicant’s complete rebuttal is at Exhibit E.  

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03801 in Executive Session on 18 June 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	                     , Panel Chair
	                     , Member
	                     , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-03801:

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 Aug 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 29 Oct 12.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Nov 12.
Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 26 Nov 12.




                   
Panel Chair





3

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01229

    Original file (BC 2013 01229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of a Letter of Evaluation; his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; Request and Authorization for Separation; and three character references. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03635

    Original file (BC 2013 03635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03635 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code “2C,” (Approved Honorable Involuntary Separation or Entry Level Separation), on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. On 14 February 2012, he opted to consult counsel and submit a statement in his behalf. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00287

    Original file (BC 2013 00287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RE code of 2C is the correct RE code based upon the applicant’s involuntary discharge with honorable [sic] character of service. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation for an Entry Level Separation (ELS) with uncharacterized character of service, the applicant’s RE code of 2C was required in accordance with AF Instruction 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00287

    Original file (BC-2013-00287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RE code of 2C is the correct RE code based upon the applicant’s involuntary discharge with honorable [sic] character of service. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation for an Entry Level Separation (ELS) with uncharacterized character of service, the applicant’s RE code of 2C was required in accordance with AF Instruction 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05611

    Original file (BC 2013 05611.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 Nov 13, after serving four months and seven days, the applicant was furnished an ELS with uncharacterized service, and issued an RE Code of 2C and Narrative Reason for Separation of “Entry Level Performance or Conduct.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00582

    Original file (BC 2014 00582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Will be administratively corrected) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an honorable discharge and requests that he be provided more favorable separation and RE codes. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code “2C” is erroneous and will administratively correct his record to reflect RE code “3A” which denotes “First-term Airman [involuntarily separated] {entry level} for inability to satisfactorily progress in a required training program without characterization of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03296

    Original file (BC-2012-03296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Air Force personnel “confirmed” that he would receive a medical discharge within six months and rejoin the Air Force. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his RE code. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the applicant be corrected to show that he was discharged on 27 February...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02629

    Original file (BC 2014 02629.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02629 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a “1” RE code series that would allow him to reenlist. However, HAF/A1P is postured to reevaluate those Airmen who were affected by entry level separation for failing academically between fiscal years...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03925

    Original file (BC-2012-03925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The RE Code of 2C is required based on the ELS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03643

    Original file (BC 2012 03643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03643 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to allow his reentry in the military. On 7 Aug 2007, his commander notified him...