Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02712
Original file (BC-2012-02712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02712 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be amended to reflect the following: 

 

 a. Item 12f (foreign service), 1 year, 11 months and 28 days, 
rather than 11 months and 28 days. 

 

 b. Item 13 (Decorations) the addition of the Armed Forces 
Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The AFEM was awarded to members of the 86th Tactical Fighter Wing 
for participation in Operation EARNEST WILL during a temporary 
deployment in 1987. He was one of the recipients of the award; 
however, his DD Form 214 does not reflect the award. Also, 
foreign service is miscalculated. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 July 1986. 

 

The applicant was honorably discharged on 2 January 1990 in the 
grade of senior airman under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Early 
Separation Program-Strength Reduction). He served 3 years, 
5 months and 25 days on active duty and credited with 11 months 
and 28 days of foreign service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 


 

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the AFEM. They state the AFEM is 
awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces who after 
1 July 1958, have participated in a United States military 
operation, in direct support of the United Nations (UN), or 
United States operations of assistance for friendly foreign 
nations for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days. 

 

There is no documentation to support the applicant deployed in 
support of Operation EARNEST WILL rendering the applicant 
ineligible for award of the AFEM. To grant the applicant relief 
would be contrary to the eligibility criteria established by DoD 
1348.33. 

 

Based on their review the applicant’s official military personnel 
record, they were able to determine that award of the Air Force 
Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) should have been awarded during 
the applicant’s service and was not reflected in his records. 
Upon final board decision, administrative correction of the 
applicant’s official military personnel record will be completed 
by AFPC/DPSOY. 

 

The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. They state a review of the 
applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted 
failed to provide any documents that can accurately determine the 
amount of time the applicant served at Ramstein AB, Germany. 
They were also unable to determine any deployment time for the 
applicant during his time spent on active duty since no 
documentation exists to support his claim. 

 

The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 26 November 2012 and 8 March 2013, copies of the Air Force 
evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and 
response. As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The 
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with 
the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of 
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for 
our conclusion that other than the necessary administration 
correction noted by AFPC/DPSID, the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02712 in Executive Session on 4 April 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02712 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 June 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 3 November 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 5 February 2013. 

 Exhibit E. Letter SAF/MRBR, dated 26 November 2012 and 

 email communique. 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03209

    Original file (BC-2012-03209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members, who earned the Armed Forces Expeditionary medal for service in Vietnam between 1 Jul 58 and 3 Jul 65, may elect to receive the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) instead of the AFEM. After a thorough review of the evidence presented and the service member’s military personnel records, we believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude the applicant served in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03553

    Original file (BC 2013 03553 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSID states that the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments was unable to verify the applicant's Foreign Service time in Vietnam. Moreover, the applicant’s TDY orders and the Foreign and/or Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 match up perfectly. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 03206

    Original file (BC 2010 03206.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and Thailand. The VSM is awarded to all members of the United States Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 1965 and 28 Mar 1973, in the area of eligibility. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2010- 03206 in Executive Session on 14 Feb 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 04176 2

    Original file (BC 2010 04176 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the original case, the applicant contended he served on temporary duty (TDY) in Vietnam and Okinawa, Japan, and submitted a sworn statement from an alleged eyewitness who served with him in Vietnam in support of his request. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit F. On 20 Feb 14, AFPC/DPAPP directed the applicant’s DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect 4 months and 13 days of foreign-service credit for his service in Germany during the period 3 Oct 63 through 15 Feb 64. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01942

    Original file (BC 2013 01942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served in support of Operation ELF ONE from 3 Jun 81 thru 16 Oct 81. The AFEM may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who after 1 Jul 58, participate, or have participated as members of the U.S. military units in a U.S. military operation in which service members of any Military Department participate, in the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in significant numbers. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02038

    Original file (BC-2012-02038.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VSM is awarded to all members of the United States Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 1965 and 28 Mar 1973, in the area of eligibility. In addition, the applicant served in Korea for one day and therefore does not meet the basic award criteria for the AFEM as he did not serve for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-02038 in Executive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04259

    Original file (BC 2013 04259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSID is unable to determine the dates and locations for the applicant's TDY to Vietnam; therefore, the applicant is ineligible for award of the AFEM, VSM, or the VCM during the award inclusive periods. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2013- 04259 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01167

    Original file (BC-2012-01167.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VSM is awarded to all service members of the U. S. Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in the area of eligibility (AOE). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial noting a review of the service member’s personnel records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate foreign service time in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02562

    Original file (BC 2013 02562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02562 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01843

    Original file (BC 2013 01843.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01843 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected as follows: a. A though review of the applicant’s official military personnel records indicated there is no official documentation verifying the applicant...