Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02395
Original file (BC-2012-02395.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-02395 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
    
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His Fitness Assessment dated 30 Jan 12 be removed from the Air 
Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
After failing the FA test he received a medical evaluation that 
determined he had a previously unidentified medical condition and 
should have been profiled differently for the test on 30 Jan 12.  
The 55 MDG/SGP recommends the test be invalidated.  He provides a 
memorandum from his provider, dated 21 Feb 12, that states he had 
medical conditions that precluded him from achieving a passing FA 
score. 
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
commander’s  request  for  a  medical  evaluation,  a  copy  of  his 
AF Form  108,  Physical  Fitness  Education  and  Intervention 
Processing, and a copy of his FA scores. 
 
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of 
senior airman (E-4).   
 
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: 
   DATE 
 
   5 Oct 10 
  21 Apr 11 
  28 Jul 11 
  13 Oct 11 
* 30 Jan 12 
 
*Contested FA score. 
 
 
 

SCORE 
SATISFACTORY 
UNSATISFACTORY 
UNSATISFACTORY 
UNSATISFACTORY 
UNSATISFACTORY 

 

 
 
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial stating that the applicant was asked 
to provide the AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, and 
AF Form 422, Physical Profile Serial Report; however, he has not 
responded to their request. 
 
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 17 Sep 12 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the  case.    While  the  applicant  contends  he  had  a  medical 
condition and should have been profiled for the test on 30 Jan 
12, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude 
that his alleged medical condition precluded him from receiving a 
fair FA.  In view of this, and noting there was no documentation 
located  or  provided  that  indicates  the  applicant  was  unable  to 
complete  his  FA,  we  find  no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the 
relief sought in this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-02395 in Executive Session on 23 Jan 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

, Panel Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

 
 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 May 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 7 Sep 12, w/atch. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   PanelChair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605

    Original file (BC 2013 04605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000

    Original file (BC 2012 05000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01625

    Original file (BC 2013 01625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to the applicable regulation in regards to the date of the test, AFI 36-2905, members with a composite score <75 are considered “Unsatisfactory.” The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 7 Jun 2013 94.90 Excellent *11 Mar 13 74.30 Unsatisfactory 10 Dec 12 74.00 Unsatisfactory 28 Jun 12 85.90 Satisfactory 15 Dec 11 87.50 Satisfactory *Annotates Contested FA On 13 Mar 13, an AF FM 108 was signed by the applicants medical provider. On 16 Jan...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04890

    Original file (BC 2013 04890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04890 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 28 Aug 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Also, there was no indication the commander wanted to invalidate the Fitness Assessment.” In accordance with (IAW)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01465

    Original file (BC 2013 01465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01465 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02264

    Original file (BC 2013 02264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 09 Oct 13 86.88 Satisfactory 14 Mar 13 85.30 Satisfactory 20 Sep 12 77.00 Satisfactory 20 Mar 12 84.40 Satisfactory *07 Dec 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 2 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence, specifically AF Form 422.” In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03347

    Original file (BC 2013 03347.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM3 (3 Jan 12), Attachment 1, Section 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. The FSQ should be completed no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05203

    Original file (BC 2013 05203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non- exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note that although the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04664

    Original file (BC-2011-04664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His chronic medical condition affected his Physical Training (PT). The applicant contends his chronic back pain precluded him from passing four fitness assessments (FA) and ultimately resulted in him receiving the contested referral enlisted performance report (EPR). While the applicant has provided a supporting statement from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05327

    Original file (BC 2012 05327.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Unable to complete electronic profile at this time but currently in process.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. While we note the comments from AFPC/DPSIM indicating the...