AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02395
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment dated 30 Jan 12 be removed from the Air
Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
After failing the FA test he received a medical evaluation that
determined he had a previously unidentified medical condition and
should have been profiled differently for the test on 30 Jan 12.
The 55 MDG/SGP recommends the test be invalidated. He provides a
memorandum from his provider, dated 21 Feb 12, that states he had
medical conditions that precluded him from achieving a passing FA
score.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
commander’s request for a medical evaluation, a copy of his
AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention
Processing, and a copy of his FA scores.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
senior airman (E-4).
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows:
DATE
5 Oct 10
21 Apr 11
28 Jul 11
13 Oct 11
* 30 Jan 12
*Contested FA score.
SCORE
SATISFACTORY
UNSATISFACTORY
UNSATISFACTORY
UNSATISFACTORY
UNSATISFACTORY
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial stating that the applicant was asked
to provide the AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, and
AF Form 422, Physical Profile Serial Report; however, he has not
responded to their request.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 17 Sep 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case. While the applicant contends he had a medical
condition and should have been profiled for the test on 30 Jan
12, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude
that his alleged medical condition precluded him from receiving a
fair FA. In view of this, and noting there was no documentation
located or provided that indicates the applicant was unable to
complete his FA, we find no basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02395 in Executive Session on 23 Jan 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 May 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 7 Sep 12, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 12.
PanelChair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000
DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01625
According to the applicable regulation in regards to the date of the test, AFI 36-2905, members with a composite score <75 are considered Unsatisfactory. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 7 Jun 2013 94.90 Excellent *11 Mar 13 74.30 Unsatisfactory 10 Dec 12 74.00 Unsatisfactory 28 Jun 12 85.90 Satisfactory 15 Dec 11 87.50 Satisfactory *Annotates Contested FA On 13 Mar 13, an AF FM 108 was signed by the applicants medical provider. On 16 Jan...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04890
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04890 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 28 Aug 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Also, there was no indication the commander wanted to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. In accordance with (IAW)...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01465
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01465 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02264
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 09 Oct 13 86.88 Satisfactory 14 Mar 13 85.30 Satisfactory 20 Sep 12 77.00 Satisfactory 20 Mar 12 84.40 Satisfactory *07 Dec 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 2 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence, specifically AF Form 422. In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03347
Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum). In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM3 (3 Jan 12), Attachment 1, Section 10, If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. The FSQ should be completed no...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05203
If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non- exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note that although the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04664
The complete AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His chronic medical condition affected his Physical Training (PT). The applicant contends his chronic back pain precluded him from passing four fitness assessments (FA) and ultimately resulted in him receiving the contested referral enlisted performance report (EPR). While the applicant has provided a supporting statement from...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05327
Unable to complete electronic profile at this time but currently in process. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. While we note the comments from AFPC/DPSIM indicating the...