Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02393
Original file (BC-2012-02393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02393 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His 14 Mar 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He had an undiagnosed medical condition which should have 
precluded him from participating in the contested FA. As a 
result of the test failure, he was evaluated by medical 
personnel who determined he had a previously unidentified 
medical condition and should have been profiled differently for 
the FA in question. The examining physician highlighted a post 
operative condition related to foot surgery that precluded the 
applicant from achieving a passing score on his FA, and the 55 
Medical Group Chief of Staff concurred. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of the 
memo from the medical community, and his Individual FA History. 
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant served in the Regular Air Force in the grade of 
Staff Sergeant (E-5) during the matter under review. 

 

Per AFI 36-2905, AFGM 3, Fitness Program, Paragraph 10, states 
that if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is 
unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the 
option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility 
(MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid 
by the Unit Commander. If the medical evaluation validates the 
illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test 
results. The Airman will then be required to retest within five 
duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the 
medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP). The FA 
Coordinator staff will hold scores of RegAF and AGR Airmen who 


become injured or ill for five duty days to allow the Medical 
and Commander reviews. Scores can be entered into the AFFMS on 
the sixth duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test 
results. 

 

The applicant’s last six FA results: 

 

Date 

Composite Score 

Rating 

11 Jul 12 

47.00 

Unsatisfactory 

14 Mar 12 

63.00 

Unsatisfactory 

27 Jul 11 

82.00 

Satisfactory 

22 Dec 10 

63.00 

Unsatisfactory 

23 Sep 10 

53.000 

Unsatisfactory 

3 Jun 10 

10.00 

Poor 



 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
remove the FA score in question. On 20 Jun 12, a memorandum was 
sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation; 
specifically, copies of his AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition 
Report, AF Form 422, Physical Profile Serial Report, signed 
fitness score sheet, and questionnaire for the FA. The member 
did not provide the requested documentation. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, 
is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 24 Sep 12 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 


3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case. The Board notes the applicant did not take 
advantage of the required process for establishing a limiting 
medical condition prior to his FA, and did not submit sufficient 
evidence to indicate the FA in question was administered 
inappropriately or incorrectly. Moreover, the only portion of 
the Fitness Assessment in question the applicant was tested on 
was abdominal circumference. IAW AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, 
exemptions for abdominal circumference are only granted in 
specific circumstances, such as pregnancy or abdominal surgery. 
The Board does not believe the applicant’s medical condition 
associated with foot surgery would have precluded him from 
adhering to a healthy diet and a proper food portion control 
scheme that would allow him to remain within Air Force 
standards. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02393 in Executive Session on 7 Feb 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02393 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 May 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 12 Sep 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Sep 12. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02264

    Original file (BC 2013 02264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 09 Oct 13 86.88 Satisfactory 14 Mar 13 85.30 Satisfactory 20 Sep 12 77.00 Satisfactory 20 Mar 12 84.40 Satisfactory *07 Dec 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 2 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence, specifically AF Form 422.” In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01087

    Original file (BC 2013 01087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. The applicant’s last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 26 Nov 13 79.00 Satisfactory 26 Jul 13 77.20 Unsatisfactory 1 Mar 13 EXEMPT EXEMPT 31 Dec 12 23.75 Unsatisfactory *10 Sept 12 64.67 Unsatisfactory 27 Feb 12 78.30 Satisfactory *15 Nov 11 68.20 Unsatisfactory *12 May 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235

    Original file (BC 2013 03235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01784

    Original file (BC 2013 01784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 28 Jan 13 0.00 Unsatisfactory 29 Oct 12 68.78 Unsatisfactory 30 Apr 12 88.00 Satisfactory 20 Oct 11 Exempt Exempt *26 Jul 11 67.50 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence, specifically no commander invalidation.” In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01465

    Original file (BC 2013 01465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01465 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04468

    Original file (BC 2013 04468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finally, the applicant did not provide any additional supporting documentation to consider, i.e., commander’s invalidation, AF Form 422, etc.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void and remove the FAs dated 22 Feb 11, 1 Mar 11, and 22 Jun 11. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM and AFPC/DPSIDE evaluations is at Exhibit B and Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006

    Original file (BC-2012-02006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His provider’s memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test.” On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605

    Original file (BC 2013 04605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01787

    Original file (BC 2013 01787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical documents mentioned above validates the applicant had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. DPSIM indicates he has not provided documentation from his medical provider stating his medical condition would prevent him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. In this respect, the applicant failed to provide a letter from his medical provider stating how his medical condition prevented him from passing the AC component...