Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01629
Original file (BC-2012-01629.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01629 

 

 COUNSEL: NO 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded 
to honorable. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was struggling with a drug addiction when he entered the Air 
Force and thought he could beat the addiction on his own. The 
Air Force did not offer him an opportunity to receive treatment 
and a change in his discharge status would help him move on and 
rebuild his life. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted 
in the Regular Air Force on 18 Nov 86. 

 

On 17 Sep 87, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was 
recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct – 
commission of a serious offense (drug abuse). The reason for 
the action included the applicant’s use of cocaine as evidenced 
by a positive urine specimen for which he received nonjudicial 
punishment (NJP) under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of 
Military Justice (UCMJ). 

 

On 17 Sep 87, he acknowledged receipt of the action and, after 
consulting with legal counsel, waived his right to submit a 
statement in his own behalf. 

 

On 21 Sep 87, the case was found to be legally sufficient and on 
23 Sep 87, the discharge authority directed the applicant be 
furnished a general discharge, without probation and 
rehabilitation. On 23 Sep 87, the applicant was furnished a 


general (under honorable conditions) discharge and was credited 
with ten months and six days of total active service. 

 

On 19 Feb 13, a request for post-service information was 
forwarded to applicant for comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice 
that occurred in the discharge process. Based on the available 
evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s General (Under 
Honorable Conditions) discharge for misconduct – drug abuse was 
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation and within the commander’s discretionary authority. 
He has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the 
characterization of his service was improper or contrary to the 
provisions of the governing directive. In the interest of 
justice, we considered upgrading the discharge on the basis of 
clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is 
sufficient for us to recommend granting the relief sought on 
that basis. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to 
upgrade the applicant’s General (Under Honorable Conditions) 
discharge. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-01629 in Executive Session on 21 Mar 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Apr 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 19 Feb 13, w/atch. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02198

    Original file (BC-2012-02198.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02198 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 25 Nov 83, the applicant was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions) in the grade of airman first class. On 2 Jul 84, the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00854

    Original file (BC-2012-00854.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS c. Three Letter of Debt Complaints/Dishonored Check DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00854 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00190

    Original file (BC 2014 00190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00190 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01168

    Original file (BC 2009 01168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. On 10 Sep 90, the applicant appeared before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 May 09.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01168

    Original file (BC-2009-01168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. On 10 Sep 90, the applicant appeared before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 May 09.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03866

    Original file (BC-2007-03866.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03866 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 22 Sep 86, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for failing to report at the prescribed time to a military doctor and his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01789

    Original file (BC-2006-01789.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01789 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Dec 17, 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A resume of the applicant’s airman performance reports follows: CLOSE-OUT DATE OVERALL RATING 24 Sep...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02106

    Original file (BC 2014 02106.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. In the interest of justice, we considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00082

    Original file (BC-2010-00082.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received a BCD after trying to get the Air Force to help him with an addiction. However, he was not provided the proper treatment for an opiate addiction and shortly after asking for and not receiving the proper help began writing prescriptions for Oxycodone. The applicant was able to relate in his unsworn statement his contention that he self-referred for help with his addiction and that the Air Force did not give him proper treatment.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03522

    Original file (BC-2011-03522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03522 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the...