Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00335
Original file (BC-2012-00335.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00335 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  DD  Form  214,  Report  of  Separation  from  Active  Duty,  be 
corrected to reflect the following:   
 
  1) Vietnam  Service  Medal  (VSM)  (Will  be  administratively 
corrected  to  reflect  the  VSM  w/one  Bronze  Service  Star  (VSM 
w/1BSS). 
 
  2) Republic  of  Vietnam  Gallantry  Cross  (RVNGC)  (Will  be 
administratively  corrected  to  reflect  the  Republic  of  Vietnam 
Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P).   
 
  3) Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He was never issued the RVNCM nor is it reflected on his DD Form 
214.  
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Forms 214 and AF Form 909, Airman Performance Report.  
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant served on active duty from 17 Dec 71 to 16 Mar 79.   
He  is  credited  with  1  year,  5  months  and  15  days  of  Foreign 
Service.   
 
The  RVNCM  is  awarded  to  members  of  the  Armed  Forces  of  the 
United States who served for six months in South Vietnam during 
the  period  1  Mar  61  to  28 Mar 73,  or  who  served  outside  the 
geographical  limits  of  the  Republic  of  Vietnam  and  contributed 
direct  combat  support  to  the  Republic  of  Vietnam  and  Armed 
Forces for six months.  Such individuals must meet the criteria 
established  for  the  Air  Force  Expeditionary  Medal  (AFEM)  (for 
Vietnam) or the VSM, to qualify for the RVNCM. 
_________________________________________________________________ 

 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPAPP  recommends  denial.    DPAPP  states  a  review  of  the 
applicant’s  military  personnel  records  and  documentation 
submitted  failed  to  provide  any  documents  that  substantiate 
Foreign  Service  time  in  Vietnam.    However,  they  were  able  to 
verify  and  confirm  Foreign  Service  boots  on  ground  at  U-Tapao 
Air Base and Ubon Air Base, Thailand.   
 
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSID  recommends  denial  of  the  applicant’s  request  for 
award of the RVNCM.  DPSID states after a thorough review of the 
applicant’s official military personnel record they were able to 
verify entitlement to the VSM w/1BSS and the RVNGC w/P and will 
administratively correct his record. 
 
DPSID  was  unable  to  locate  any  supporting  evidence  in  the 
applicant’s official military records to substantiate he served 
an  aggregate  of  six  months  in  Vietnam  or  Thailand  during  the 
inclusive dates for award of the RVNCM.   
 
The complete DPSID evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
Copies  of  the  Air  Force  evaluations  were  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  17  May  12  and  17  Sep  12  for  review  and  comment 
within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received 
by this office (Exhibit F).  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The  application  was  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the  case;  however,  we  agree  with  the  opinions  and 
recommendations  of  the  Air  Force  offices  of  primary 
responsibility (OPR) and adopt their rationale as the basis for 

 

2 

our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or  injustice.    Regarding  his  request  for  entitlements  to  award 
of the VSM and RVNGC, we note the applicant’s DD Form 214 will 
be  administratively  corrected  to  reflect  these  awards.    We  are 
not unmindful of the applicant’s service to our Nation; however, 
aside from these administrative corrections, we find no basis to 
recommend granting further relief in this case.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  Docket  Number    
BC-2012-00335  in  Executive  Session  on  18  Oct  12,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Jan 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 2 May 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 May 12. 
 
Exhibit E.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 6 Sep 12, w/atchs. 
Exhibit F.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 12. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Chair 
Member 
Member 

 
Chair 

  
  
  

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

  
  

 
 

 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03452

    Original file (BC-2012-03452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03452 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we do not find the evidence presented by the applicant is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05724

    Original file (BC 2013 05724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05724 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his foreign service in Thailand and Guam (Administratively corrected), and Okinawa. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03313

    Original file (BC 2014 03313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03313 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official military records reflect his Vietnam Service and Vietnam/Southeast Asia Service Ribbons. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), attached at Exhibit C and Exhibit D. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00408

    Original file (BC 2014 00408.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He served for a little less than four years because of hazardous missions flown in SEA. While the applicant has not provided conclusive evidence that he completed a TDY to Vietnam, it is our opinion the APR for the period ending 27 Sep 68 coupled with AFPS’s database appear to weigh more in favor of amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00241

    Original file (BC 2014 00241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00241 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). On 12 May 14, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant that they were able to verify and confirm Boots-On-Ground (BOG) Foreign Service time at Nha Trang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam from 21 Aug 65 to 14 Dec 65, for 3 months and 24 days. THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02385

    Original file (BC 2014 02385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02385 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His DD 214 was administratively corrected to reflect seven months and nine days of foreign service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01227

    Original file (BC 2014 01227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing his official military record and documentation he provided, DPAPP was able to verify and confirm boots on ground foreign service time in the Republic of Vietnam and Thailand for a total of 127 days between November 1966 and Mar 1968. In addition, the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC), Directorate of Assignments could only verify the applicant as having served in Vietnam and Thailand for a total of 127 days; therefore, rendering him ineligible for award of the VCM. Upon...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00108

    Original file (BC 2014 00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect this period of time deployed to Thailand, as well as award of the AFOUA, the VSM w/P and the RVNGC w/V. No action required by the Board, as the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03128

    Original file (BC-2012-03128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial and states that there is no evidence that supports the applicant’s contention that he served in Vietnam during the inclusive dates for these awards. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...