RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04676
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her narrative reason for separation Unsuitable-Apathy, Defective
Attitude-Evaluation officer be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During her time in technical school at Keesler Air Force Base,
she reported sexual harassment by her sergeant. She was placed
in jail when she refused his sexual advances. She was discharged
30 years ago and her narrative reason has haunted her and left a
stain on her name.
The applicant provides no documentation in support of her appeal.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 August
1980.
The applicant was notified by her commander on 25 February 1981,
of his intent to recommend her discharge from the Air Force under
the provisions of AFM 39-12. The reason for this action was the
applicants apathy, defective attitude, and inability to expend
efforts constructively as shown by her downward trend in duty
performance. The specific reasons are as follows:
a. The applicant did on or about 4 November 1980 to
5 February 1981 receive numerous counselings for not doing
assigned details; failure to repair to mandatory GI party,
failure to report to school formation and failure to repair to PC
formation; slow progress on 8 Groups Per Minute (GPM),
International Morse Code (IMC); failure to repair to CQ duty;
sleeping in class; failure to pass or progress on 10 GPM, IMC;
failure to report to morning and afternoon formation and she did
not work on that particular day; failures to obey a lawful order
of a commissioned officer.
b. The applicant did on or about 5 December 1980, 30 January
1981 and 5 February 1981 receive nonjudicial punishments under
Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for
failures to go at the time prescribed to her appointed place of
duty and failure to obey a lawful order.
An evaluation officer reviewed the case and recommended the
applicant be issued an honorable discharge.
In a legal review of the case file, the chief, civil law division
found the case legally sufficient and recommended discharge. The
discharge authority concurred with the recommendation and
directed an honorable discharge. The applicant was discharged on
15 May 1981. She served 9 months and 2 days on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice
that occurred in the discharge process. We find the narrative
reason for separation that was issued at the time of the
applicants separation accurately reflects the circumstances of
her separation. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-04676 in Executive Session on 7 June 2012, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-04676 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 November 2011.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Record.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01726
On 7 and 23 June 1978, she failed to report for duty, for which she received two failures to repair letters. Upon the recommendation of the Air Force Personnel Board, on 24 June 1981, the Secretary of the Air Force approved her request to upgrade her RE code to RE-1. Although the applicant contends she should have been medically discharged, she provides no documentary evidence to support that she was unfit for continued military service at the time of her discharge from the Air Force.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011228
On 22 February 1980, an official of the 573rd Personnel Service Company, Fort Bragg, NC, initiated a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) adjusting her enlistment grade from E-1 to E-3 effective 5 February 1979 (date of enlistment) in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program). She was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action for unsuitability, the type of discharge she could receive and its effect on further enlistment or...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00669-2
On 2 May 79, applicant submitted an application to the AFBCMR requesting medical discharge with 100% disability. The Medical Consultant states the fact that she has been granted service connection for her disability by the DVA does not entitle her to Air Force disability compensation. The Medical Consultant's evaluation, is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded that she was not fit for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02547
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was discharged on 2 Jan 75, after 8 months and 22 days on active duty. Therefore, her DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, does not list character and behavior disorder, personality disorder, or antisocial personality disorder as the basis for discharge. The applicant argues that the diagnosis of “Anti-Social Personality Disorder”...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03372
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03372 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post- service activities. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00235
On 30 September 1981, an Article 15 for absenting himself from his place of duty without authority, from 16 September 1981 to 18 September 1981, and failing to go to his place of duty on 14 September 1981. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that he makes no excuses nor does he deny any of the facts concerning his general discharge. He can...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00165
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00165 INDEX CODE: 106.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Record of Counseling (ROC) for, on or about 1 February 1979, failing to repair for a required Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01542
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01542 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009806
The applicant requests upgrade of her general discharge to an honorable discharge. On 12 April 1982, the Army Discharge Review Board denied her request for an honorable discharge. Her record of service during her last enlistment included adverse counseling statements and two NJP's; therefore, her service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00753
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00753 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 15 SEPTEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. DPPRS states that based upon the documentation in the file, they conclude...