RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03843
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While serving in the Regular Air Force, he made a number of
aerial flights into the Republic of Vietnam in support of
military operations. Although the missions originated and
terminated in the CONUS, his aircraft and crew members were
exposed to hostile actions while on the ground in Vietnam.
The evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The VSM criterion: The VSM was created by Executive Order 11213,
8 Jul 65. It is awarded to all service members of the Armed
Forces who between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, served in the
following areas of Southeast Asia: In Vietnam and contiguous
waters and airspace; in Thailand, Laos or Cambodia or the
airspace thereof and in the direct support of military operations
in Vietnam.
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained
in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air
Force which are located at Exhibits B and C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAPP reviewed this application and recommends denial. The
applicants personnel file does not reflect any time served in
Vietnam.
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit B.
AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. Although the applicant asserts he
entered Vietnam on a number of flights, DPSIDR was unable to
locate any official documents to support his claim. Furthermore,
as an non-crewmember, the applicant needed to serve 60 non-
consecutive days in Vietnam in order to qualify for the VSM.
The complete DPISDR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 16 Dec 11 for review and response. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-03843 in Executive Session on 23 Feb 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Aug 11, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 10 Nov 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 5 Dec 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 16 Dec 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03067
His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. The DVA stated the evidence of record showed he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era, therefore, exposure to herbicides is conceded. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of his request for service in Vietnam.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03321
The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the VSM and RVNCM. The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 10 Dec 10 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04125
The VSM is awarded to all members of the U.S. Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in Vietnam, its contiguous waters, or the airspace there-over, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. While the applicants record indicates that he provided in-flight services to passengers/troops and he was credited foreign service for at least two extensive TDYs, and noting that he has provided two witnesses statements attesting to his service, after considering the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04655
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicants requests...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026
AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01548
He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The DPSIDR complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 29 Oct 10 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00372
AFPC/DPAPP was able to verify the following overseas service and his DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect 25 days of Foreign Service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial for award of the VSM. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00373 in Executive Session on 9 Jun 11, under the provisions of...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02775
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence of either an error or an injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 10 Sep 08. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 08.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01864
DPAPP could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. DPSIDR states that based upon review of the applicants military records they were unable to verify that he served on Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam from Apr 72 to Aug 72. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02402
His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. DPAPP states they could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect service in Vietnam.