Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03738
Original file (BC-2011-03738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03738 

COUNSEL: NO 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his overseas 
service in Thailand. 

 

2. He be provided with any medals, badges, commendations, 
citations, and campaign ribbons awarded to him. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214 does not reflect his service in Southeast Asia. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his DD 
Form 214; information sheets on Takhli Royal Thai Air Force Base 
and the 23rd Wing; and a personal statement from his wife. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who 
served on active duty from 28 March 1962 through 25 March 1966 
with 3 months and 22 days of Foreign Service. He served 3 years, 
11 months, and 28 days on active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the request to correct the 
applicant’s record to reflect service in Thailand. DPAPP states 
that while the applicant’s DD Form 7, Airman Military Record, 
reflects 112 days of temporary duty (TDY), they are unable to 
determine the exact location of his TDY. 

 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denying the applicant’s request for any 
additional awards. DPSIDR states the applicant was awarded the 


Air Force Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) which is annotated on his DD 
Form 214. The AFEM is awarded for general service in Vietnam 
from 1 July 1958 to 3 July 1965 prior to the award of the Vietnam 
Service Medal (VSM). Whereas, it is likely the applicant 
received the AFEM for service in Southeast Asia, there is no 
evidence to show for what service he received the AFEM. 

 

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 6 January 2012 for review and response within 
30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received 
no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03738 in Executive Session on 26 April 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03738: 

 

Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 16 Sep 11, w/atchs. 

Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 15 Nov 11. 

Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 28 Dec 11. 

Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04798

    Original file (BC-2011-04798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04798 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSIDR indicates that the Directorate of Personnel Assignments (DPA)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01247

    Original file (BC-2011-01247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Thailand and Vietnam; however, his orders and record copies reflecting his service from 1966 through 1977 are missing. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 28 Aug 70 discharge; an extract of an airman performance report (APR); a statement from a former...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01861

    Original file (BC-2011-01861.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01861 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of flight records, personal flight log records and documents extracted from his military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02402

    Original file (BC-2011-02402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. DPAPP states they could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect service in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01864

    Original file (BC-2011-01864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. DPSIDR states that based upon review of the applicant’s military records they were unable to verify that he served on Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam from Apr 72 to Aug 72. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03303

    Original file (BC-2007-03303.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states based on their review of his personnel record, they could not find any documents showing he was TDY or assigned to Vietnam. The Office of Directorate of Assignments requested additional information to verify his assignment to Vietnam, he did not respond to the request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03763

    Original file (BC-2008-03763.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. There are no documents or evidence within his records that reflect he served in Vietnam. However, after a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded the VSM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00373

    Original file (BC-2011-00373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00373 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). However, the applicant’s records fail to provide documentation that clearly substantiates service in Thailand. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02842

    Original file (BC-2008-02842.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant responded stating it is unfortunate records covering the period he served on active duty are not maintained. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was...