Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03437
Original file (BC-2011-03437.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03437 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded 
to honorable. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His stepfather was an abusive alcoholic and a compulsive 
gambler. One night before duty, he was at his mother’s house to 
keep her safe from his abusive father. The first sergeant came 
to the Stockade several times a week and asked him “why don’t 
you make it easy and accept a discharge?” At the time, he did 
not realize the implications of an under other than honorable 
discharge. 

 

Sleeping on duty only occurred once and there are no other 
documents pertaining to that issue. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s administrative discharge package could not be 
located. Attempts to obtain a copy of his discharge package 
have been unsuccessful. Therefore, the circumstances and facts 
surrounding his discharge are not available. 

 

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, states they we unable to identify 
an arrest record on the basis of the information furnished. 

 

In response to a request for post-service information, the 
applicant reiterated the circumstances his family suffered 


through as a result of his abusive father. He went home often 
to take care of his family. Finally, fatigue and stress took 
its toll and he fell asleep at work. He was ultimately 
discharged and the discharge has stayed with him his entire 
life. 

 

He has lived a pretty ordinary life. He is married and has four 
children. He worked construction for several years. He later 
found he had a flare for cooking and worked at a resort area. 
He changed jobs again and worked for a medical supply company 
until he retired. 

 

He has been a member of the same church for 42 years and 
volunteers when needed. He has had no legal problems. 

 

The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Based upon the 
presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs 
and without evidence to the contrary, we must assume the 
applicant’s discharged was proper and in compliance with the 
appropriate directives. Therefore, based on the available 
evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably 
consider this application. In the interest of justice, we 
considered upgrading the applicant’s discharge on the basis of 
clemency, however, there was no evidence submitted to compel us 
to recommend granting the request on that basis. Therefore, in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon 
which to recommend granting the relief sought. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 


 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03437 in Executive Session on 7 June 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dtd 17 Aug 11, w/atch. 

Exhibit B. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dtd 14 Mar 12. 

Exhibit C. Letter, Applicant’s Response, dtd 7 Apr 12, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1988 | BC 1988 03555 1

    Original file (BC 1988 03555 1.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1988-03555 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge. He now lives a drug and alcohol free life and is employed as a professional firefighter/EMT-B and educator. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-1988-03555-1

    Original file (BC-1988-03555-1.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1988-03555 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge. He now lives a drug and alcohol free life and is employed as a professional firefighter/EMT-B and educator. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04997

    Original file (BC-2012-04997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 18 Jul 11, the applicant was disenrolled from the AFROTC program under the provisions of AFI 36-2011, Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps Program, para 6.1.5, and AFROTCI 36-2011, Cadet Operations, para 11.4.2.3, for failure to maintain military retention standards. There were many more such counseling statements on file therefore the statement that an accident was the reason for not passing...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00412

    Original file (BC-2013-00412.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He regrets everything he did while in the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during the discharge process. The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00385

    Original file (BC-2007-00385.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was a non-respondent in 1992 and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred election until age 60.” The member did not request an election based on his subsequent divorce. An open enrollment information letter was sent to the member’s home address; there is no record he made an election during that time to participate. Bipolar disease also affected his ability to respond to open season letters even though he might have signed for the letters.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03437

    Original file (BC 2014 03437.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Air Force District of Washington (AFDW) Qualifying Positions for Wear of the HAF Badge policy, dated 1 May 13, and the AFDW Guidance Memorandum to AFI 36-2903, Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel, state “This authorization applies retroactively to Ceremonial Guardsman still actively serving in the Total Force.” A copy of the complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. ? APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03525

    Original file (BC-2010-03525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s commander approved the recommendation of the discharge board on 26 Nov 80. The applicant received a UOTHC discharge on 8 Dec 80 after serving 6 years and 14 days on active duty. In response to our request, applicant provided post-service information, which is attached at Exhibit A.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02467

    Original file (BC-2010-02467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIAR states the service member did not notify the finance center of the change in his marital status when his spouse died and SBP premiums continued to be deducted from his retired pay. Upon receiving notification of both deaths, the DFAS – Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) suspended the service members spouse coverage retroactive to the date of death and issued his arrears of pay (AOP) beneficiary a refund of SBP premiums subject to the six-year statute of limitations as dictated by law. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00303

    Original file (BC-2005-00303.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00303 INDEX CODE: A68.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant, the son of the former servicemember who appears to be acting on behalf of his mother, requests that his father’s bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable; the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03522

    Original file (BC-2011-03522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03522 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the...