Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03344
Original file (BC-2011-03344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03355 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Action 
Badge (CAB). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He should receive the CAB because he was stationed at Da Nang 
Airfield on 27 Feb 67 when it was under attack by the Viet Cong. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of 
documents extracted from his military personnel records, an 
article, and photographs. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 30 Nov 62, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular 
Air Force. He served as an Jet Aircraft Mechanic. On 7 Mar 67, 
he was honorably discharged and was credited with four years, 
three months, and eight days of active service. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIMC recommends denial noting the Air Force is not 
authorized permanent wear of the CAB. The CAB may be awarded by 
any commander delegated authority by the Secretary of the Army 
during wartime, the CG, or US Army Human Resources Command and 
will be announced in permanent orders. The governing instruction 
AFI 36-2903, Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force 
Personnel, outlines the wear of sister-Service badges, insignias 


or patches and does not authorize permanent wear of the CAB. The 
CAB is only worn while permanently assigned to and performing 
duties with other services when awarded; upon permanent change of 
stations to an Air Force unit the member will remove it. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 13 Dec 11, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, while we are not unmindful or unappreciative of the 
applicant’s service to the Nation, in the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the 
requested relief. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03355 in Executive Session on 12 Apr 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Mar 11, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 12 Sep 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Oct 11. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Nov 11, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00487

    Original file (BC-2006-00487.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    To be awarded the BSM, a member while serving in any capacity with the Armed Forces of the United States on or after 7 December 1941, shall have distinguished himself by heroic or meritorious achievement or service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF states AFI 36-2903, Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel, outlines the wear of sister-Service badges, insignias and patches and does not authorize permanent wear of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00797

    Original file (BC-2010-00797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the Combat Action Badge by the Department of the Army, by Special Order, dated 7 Feb 07. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03695

    Original file (BC-2011-03695.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03695 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect entitlement to the following awards and decorations, commemorative medals, badges and beret crest earned but not awarded prior to being...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03807

    Original file (BC 2007 03807.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03807 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States, Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Crew Badge (CCB) and if applicable, the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM). The complete AFPC/DPSIDR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00933

    Original file (BC-2011-00933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provides additional information to support the fact that he was stationed at the bomb dump on Udorn AFB Thailand and requests that his case be confirmed as correct. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission, his most recent submission, dated 13 Dec 11, in judging the merits of the case; however, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01190

    Original file (BC 2014 01190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 May 14, AFPC/DPAPP informed the applicant that after a review of his records and the documents he provided, they were able to verify and confirm his boots on ground foreign service time at DaNang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, from 12 Jan 67 to 13 May 67, for 4 months and 1 day. Such permanent award will be entered in the AF Form 7 of individuals so entitled.” Based on the documentation provided by the applicant, he was designated as a crew member per AO-11, effective 23 Jun 65. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01100

    Original file (BC-2011-01100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Bronze Star Medal, Air Force Commendation with 1 bronze OLC, Presidential Unit Citation, Air Force Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with one silver star and three bronze service stars, Air Force Longevity Service Award, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces Honor Medal. The complete DPSIDR evaluation, with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04423

    Original file (BC-2011-04423.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04423 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) and the TET Offensive Commemorative Medal be added to his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge. On 8 Dec 11, AFPC/DPAPP sent the applicant a letter notifying...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03321

    Original file (BC-2010-03321.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the VSM and RVNCM. The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 10 Dec 10 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02674

    Original file (BC-2011-02674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP cannot verify the applicant was TDY to Vietnam, nor verify that the author of the supporting statement provided with his submission was assigned with him at Clark AFB or in Vietnam. We note the comments of the Air Force...