RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02303
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Middlebury, PA to
Troy, AL.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He initially enlisted from Middlebury, PA, but he had a break in
service from 1995 to 1997 and was commissioned in Troy, AL in
1997. Therefore, his HOR should be Troy, AL.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System
(MilPDS) indicates the applicant enlisted in the Air Force at
Middlebury, PA on 3 Mar 92 and was discharged to attend Reserve
Officer Training School (ROTC) on 25 Aug 95. He began ROTC on
26 Aug 95, was commissioned on 30 Jun 97, and re-entered active
duty on 1 July 1997. On 9 Aug 01, he was released from active
duty in the grade of captain (O-3) at the completion of his
required active service.
HOR is defined as the place recorded as the home of the
individual at the time they enlisted, were commissioned, or
initially ordered to active duty. It is recorded in the
military personnel record to determine transportation
entitlements upon separation.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/JA opines on the term break in service as it relates
to HOR. Per the Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), when a
member is reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted the HOR remains
the place recorded as the individuals HOR when initially
commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into the
tour of active duty, unless there is a break in service of more
than one full day. A break in service, for HOR purposes, must
be into civilian status, and not just off of active duty.
Therefore, recall to a new tour of active serviceeven if it
follows a break of more than one daywill not qualify without
complete severance from the service.
A complete copy of the AFPC/JA evaluation, with attachment, is
at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of
an error or injustice. The HOR is permanently affixed
throughout a members military service and may only be changed
if the member has a complete break in service of greater than
one day. Transition from active duty to attend AFROTC does not
constitute a complete break in service, and the transition
between active duty and AFROTC enrollment was not greater than
one day. Thus, the applicant has not had a complete break in
service of greater than one day since he initially enlisted on
3 Mar 92.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIP evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 18 Nov 11 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility (OPRs) and adopt their rationale as the basis of
our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable
action on this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-02303 in Executive Session on xxx, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chief
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Jun 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/JA, dated 28 Sep 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 17 Oct 11.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Nov 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01105
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01105 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home Of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXXXXX to XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX, was his correct HOR and the place he resided for almost two years prior to commissioning at the University of XXXXXXXXXX Y, after graduating from Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC). While the Board notes the comment from...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01941
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 12 Nov 14 for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03517
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03517 INDEX CODE: 135.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Oct 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive active duty service credit for two years (1979-1981) of Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) time while he was a member of the Simultaneous Membership Program...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02924
Item 7a (Place of Entry into Active Duty (PLEAD)) reflect Niceville, FL, rather than Tuscaloosa, AL. b. Item 7b (Home of Record (HOR) at Time of Entry) reflect Niceville, FL, rather than Clifton, VA. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00695
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00695 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to reflect Hallandale Beach, Florida. His immediate family has a residence in Florida and it is this location both he and his spouse spend the majority of their time when visiting. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02043
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02043 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be corrected. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Additionally, it states the place recorded as the individuals home when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commissioned,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02313
On 17 Oct 09, he was assigned duties in an Air Force office and his OPR for this period proves he fulfilled his service commitment. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit Q). The MRB Legal Advisor states that according to AF/JAA, if an officer is appointed in another competitive category, both the time spent as an enrolled student at the USUHS and time after disenrollment would count toward credit for promotion.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00791
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00791 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02517
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he agrees with AFPC’s summary of his basis for request except for their final statement, “…there was a delay in signing the required paperwork needed to make the correction to his DIEUS.” He states, actually, there was an AFROTC-induced delay in processing his four-year scholarship award delaying his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03428
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03428 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Sacramento, CA. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial indicating there is...