Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02263
Original file (BC-2011-02263.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02263 

 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His most recent Air Force (AF) Form 899, Request and 
Authorization for Permanent Change of Station – Military be 
changed to reflect a no cost permanent change of station (PCS) 
so that he can apply for a Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) 
waiver to restore his previous BAH rate. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He did not move his residence nor household goods during the 
recent change in duty station from Hurlburt Field to Naval Air 
Station (NAS) Pensacola, Florida. His current BAH calculated 
from the Pensacola zip code is lower than his previous BAH 
calculated from the Hurlburt Field zip code. The result is a 
substantial loss of income. He is requesting a waiver on the 
grounds that he completed a no cost PCS. He met all the 
requirements for the BAH waiver in accordance with Air Force 
policy. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal 
statement, copy of his AF Form 899, DC//DAPE-MSO// Messages 
dates 052114Z FEB 08 Subject: EXCEPTION TO POLICY GUIDANCE FOR 
ALLOWANCE BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING (BAH) WAIVERS, 
verification of travel voucher payment, copies of his DFAS Form 
702, Defense Finance and Accounting Service Military Leave and 
Earnings Statement, and a copy of an email message from the 
Chief, Basic Pay and Entitlements Policy, RSS - Housing Office. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of Technical Sergeant (TSgt). 

 


The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application 
extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force (Exhibit B). Accordingly there is no need to 
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPA recommends denial. DPAPA states that proper protocol 
was followed in processing the applicant’s assignment. Air 
Force assignments are made based on individual qualification, 
availability, and equity, not cost, under AFI 36-2110, Assignments, dated 20 April 2005. The applicant has a fully 
funded PCS order made consistent with normal PCS selection 
criteria. Approval at the Board level appears not to be 
warranted since he would not have been approved for a low-cost 
PCS had he known about the program and submitted the required 
documents. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPAPA evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force Evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 10 November 2011 for review and comment within 30 
days. As of this date, this office has not received a response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice that would 
warrant relief in this case. The applicant contends that he was 
unaware of the low/no cost PCS policy. Had he received proper 
counseling, he would have submitted the proper documents to 
request consideration for a low/no cost PCS and remain entitled 
to the BAH at the w/dependents rate for Hurlburt Field. We note 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility is recommending 
denial; however, we find it reasonable that the applicant would 
have requested the “low/no cost” option, as it appears he never 
intended to relocate his family and believe the applicant has 
established a reasonable basis for approval. However, we have 
been advised that in accordance with the JFTR, paragraph U5100, 


approval of the applicant’s low/no cost PCS will require him to 
refund the amount of $130.92 received as payment for his PCS. 
We find no error or injustice in the requirement for him to 
refund this payment and, therefore, no basis to recommend any 
relief on this issue. Additionally, we note the applicant’s 
current Date-Arrive-Station (DAS) and Active Duty Service 
Commitment (ADSC) correlate to the current assignment code and 
that a change to the PCS fund code will affect this DAS and 
ADSC. Although we recommend changing his permanent change of 
station to low/no cost, we believe his DAS and ADSC should 
remain unchanged to provide the new unit of assignment stability 
and continuity in the position. Therefore, we recommend his 
records be corrected as indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: 

 

 a. AF Form 899, Request and Authorization for Permanent 
Change of Station – Military, Special Order AD-141229, dated 
20 September 2010, be amended in Block 19, “Authority and PCS 
Code” to reflect a PCS ID of “V” rather than “E.” 

 

 b. Competent authority granted him a Basic Allowance for 
Housing (BAH) waiver effective 7 December 2010 to retain the 
BAH rate of his previous duty location at Hurlburt Field, FL. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
BC-2011-02263 in Executive Session on 14 February 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 9 June 2011. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPAPA, dated 4 November 2011. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 November 2011 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02100

    Original file (BC-2011-02100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02100 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His June 2010 Permanent Change of Station (PCS) from Buckley AFB, CO to Schriever AFB, CO be retroactively reclassified as Low Cost/No Cost so he can apply for a Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) Rate Protection Waiver. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03613

    Original file (BC-2005-03613.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03613 INDEX CODE: 113.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 MAY 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date, incurred due to a Permanent Change-of-Station (PCS), be changed from 29 Jun 06 to 31 May 05. He has not provided sufficient justification or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02780

    Original file (BC 2014 02780.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that her AF Form 899, Request and Authorization for Permanent Change of Station – Military, Special Order AE-034622 dated 19 Jan 11, be amended in Item 19, Authority and PCS Code,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01978

    Original file (BC-2006-01978.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 129.02 AFBCMR BC-2006-01978 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01034

    Original file (BC-2006-01034.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2006-01034 INDEX CODE: 100.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00903

    Original file (BC-2006-00903.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2006-00903 INDEX CODE: MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00562

    Original file (BC-2006-00562.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 129.02 AFBCMR BC-2006-00562 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03084

    Original file (BC-2006-03084.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 128.14 AFBCMR BC-2006-03084 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02866

    Original file (BC-2006-02866.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 128.14 AFBCMR BC-2006-02866 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04206

    Original file (BC-2011-04206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2011-04206 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...