Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00575
Original file (BC-2011-00575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00575 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He injured his legs while returning his damaged aircraft to 
England from a mission in Germany. His aircraft had taken more 
than 2,000 hits from enemy fire and was totally destroyed. 

 

The applicant states the award of the PH is justified when 
“injury caused by vehicle of aircraft accident resulting from 
enemy fire.” Additionally, the Department of Defense (DoD) 
should recognize all who are injured while in service to their 
country and award the PH to those who have earned the 
distinction. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
Veterans’ Administration (VA) disability compensation or pension 
award letter, narrative of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) 
award, and letters written in 1947 and 1951. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 10 March 1943, the former member was commissioned in the Army 
Air Force. 

 

On 28 September 1945, he was discharged with an honorable 
discharge. He had 1 year, 10 months and 9 days of total active 
service. 

 

His WD AGO Form 53-98, Military Record and Report of Separation 
Certificate of Service reflects award of the European, African, 
Middle Eastern (EAME) Service Medal, Air Medal with three oak 
leaf clusters, and the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) with one 
oak leaf cluster. 


 

The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of 
enemy actions (e.g., gunshots or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand 
combat wounds, and forced aircraft bailout injuries, etc). In 
addition, it is necessary that the wound required or received 
documented treatment by medical personnel. Indirect injuries do 
not meet the criteria for award of the PH. These include, but 
are not limited to, injuries received while seeking shelter from 
mortar or rocket attacks, aircraft bombings, grenades, and 
injuries incurred while serving as an aircrew member or in a 
passenger status because of the aircraft’s evasive measures 
against hostile fire. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states the applicant did 
not provide nor were we able to locate medical documentation to 
substantiate medical treatment was received for the injury or a 
statement from a medical officer attesting that an examination 
revealed that an injury of the type incurred, would or should 
have received medical treatment. Additionally, the DFC 
specifically states “a crash landing was made without injury to 
personnel.” 

 

DPSIDR states the Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) disapproved 
the applicant’s request on 8 April 2011, and provided the 
following comments: “Disapproved – no evidence provided to show 
that injury resulted as a direct result of enemy action.” 

 

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant states due to the damage to the aircraft, he had 
to jam his legs behind the controls and flew in this position 
for three hours. His injuries were a direct result of enemy 
actions and resulted in his Veteran Administration (VA) 
disability rating of 30 percent for leg injuries. Additionally, 
the applicant states “the requirements state in case an 
individual is injured as a result of enemy fire, the decision 
will be made in favor of the individual and the award will be 
made.” 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we find no evidence which would lead us 
to believe the applicant’s injuries were a direct result of 
enemy action as required for award of the PH. Therefore, we 
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the 
basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim 
of an error or injustice. The personal sacrifice the applicant 
has endured for his country is noted and our decision is not 
intended in any way to lessen the importance of his service; 
however, insufficient documentary evidence has been presented to 
warrant awarding him the PH. In the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2011-00575 in Executive Session on 29 June 2011, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The following documentary evidence was considered pertaining to 
AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-00575: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 May 2010, w/atchs. 

Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Military Records. 

 Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, Letter, dated 11 April 2011. 

 Exhibit D. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 6 May 2011. 

 Exhibit E. Applicant’s Letter, dated 19 May 2011. 

 

 

 

 
Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00130

    Original file (BC 2014 00130.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received shrapnel wounds in his arms and legs during a rescue mission on 3 Apr 72 at Cam Lo, Vietnam. The “AFGCM w/4BOLC” to read “Air Force Good Conduct Medal with one Silver Oak Leaf Cluster (AFGCM w/1SOLC).” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04079

    Original file (BC-2002-04079.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should receive the PH for a wound he received as a direct result of enemy action on 25 March 1945. He did not refer to any medical treatment he might have received or provide any documentation showing that he did received any medical treatment for leg injuries incurred on 25 March 1943. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04155

    Original file (BC-2011-04155.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04155 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. The applicant provided as evidence an eyewitness statement, which gives the date of the injury as 6 June 1944, and the site of the injuries as the former service member’s leg. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02592

    Original file (BC-2011-02592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the evaluation prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force found at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request based on the lack of evidence establishing the aircraft crash was combat related. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1990-00446A

    Original file (BC-1990-00446A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for injuries he received on 26 December 1969. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 27 June 1990, the Board considered the applicant’s request that he be awarded the PH, and that his record, to include the DFC awarded for extraordinary achievement during the period 19 August 1969 to 3 July 1970, be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by an SSB for the Calendar Years 1987 and 1989 (CY87 &...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03822

    Original file (BC-2010-03822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03822 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the following: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the DFC and PH. DPSIDR states the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02555

    Original file (BC-2007-02555.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). In addition, it is necessary that the wound have required treatment by medical personnel. In regard to the applicant’s request for award of the PH, the Board notes the evidence of record supports the fact that the injuries he sustained on 21 Dec 66 were the result of an aircraft accident and not a direct result of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01640

    Original file (BC-2011-01640.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AR 600-45.C4 permits award of the PH for frostbite for personnel “actually engaged in combat.” PL 104-106, dated 10 Feb 96, entitled former POWs to receive a PH for wounds suffered as a POW. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal, for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01863

    Original file (BC-2011-01863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There was no medical documentation provided which would verify the aircraft crash and his resulting injuries were the direct result of enemy action. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s advocate reiterates the applicant should be entitled to the PH Medal due to the fact the applicant was taking fire during landing. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03989

    Original file (BC-2010-03989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence which would lead us to believe the deceased member’s injuries were a direct result of enemy action or friendly fire as required for award of the PH. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the deceased member has not been the victim of an error or...