Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00301
Original file (BC-2011-00301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00301 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

The following be corrected on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of 
the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): 

 

1) His Temporary Duty (TDY) Assignment dates. 

 

2) The Aircraft Schools he attended. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His TDY dates are missing from his DD Form 214 and the aircraft 
schools he attended are not reflected. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant served on active duty from 19 February 1960 to 
18 February 1964 as an aircraft mechanic. The applicant’s 
DD Form 214 reflects he completed 60 hours of training at the 
Aircraft Mechanic (Jet Fighter) school. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
document the performance of temporary duty in his record. DPAPP 
states the information provided in the Master Personnel Record 
does not reflect the applicant had any foreign service. 

 

The complete DPAPP evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. 

 

 

APFC/DPSIT recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
document the aircraft training courses he attended in his 


record. DPSIT states the applicant has not provided proof of 
course completion. 

 

The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 9 September 2011, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received 
no response. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of this case. However, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an 
error or injustice. Additionally, we note that the applicant’s 
DD Form 214 already lists in block 28, under schools and 
courses, the aircraft courses he completed. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-00301 in Executive Session on 12 October 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jan 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 8 Apr 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 25 Aug 11. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Sep 11. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02277

    Original file (BC-2007-02277.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02277 INDEX CODE: 100.07, 107.00, 113.00 XXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), credit for Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam, completion of J60 Engine formal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03269

    Original file (BC-2011-03269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214 Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty was accomplished and attached to the letter sent to the applicant. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to reflect service in Iceland, and Thailand on his DD Form 214. The Board notes the Air Force office of primary responsibility confirms the applicant was TDY to Spain as indicated in an EPR.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01166

    Original file (BC-2009-01166.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01166 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). DPSIDR also states they cannot support his request for award of the AFResM because he did not serve the minimum time necessary to qualify for this award.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01166

    Original file (BC 2009 01166.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01166 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). DPSIDR also states they cannot support his request for award of the AFResM because he did not serve the minimum time necessary to qualify for this award.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01642

    Original file (BC-2011-01642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01642 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military personnel records be corrected to include the following awards, decorations, training courses, and qualifications and his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected appropriately: 1. A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01247

    Original file (BC-2011-01247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Thailand and Vietnam; however, his orders and record copies reflecting his service from 1966 through 1977 are missing. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 28 Aug 70 discharge; an extract of an airman performance report (APR); a statement from a former...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01274

    Original file (BC-2012-01274.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR states based on the applicant’s duties and responsibilities as an aircraft mechanic, his duty location (Okinawa, Japan), and the fact his DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the VSM and RVCM, the likelihood of his having served in direct support of military operations supporting Vietnam is highly likely. This document is not inherently part of Air Force members’ personnel records; therefore, this documentation is not always...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01323

    Original file (BC-2011-01323.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was mailed to the applicant on 30 September 2011, for review and comments within 30 days. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03209

    Original file (BC-2012-03209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service members, who earned the Armed Forces Expeditionary medal for service in Vietnam between 1 Jul 58 and 3 Jul 65, may elect to receive the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) instead of the AFEM. After a thorough review of the evidence presented and the service member’s military personnel records, we believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude the applicant served in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...