Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04717
Original file (BC-2010-04717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04717 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Over 20 years ago, he served his time for making poor decisions. 
He is hoping that by taking responsibility for his actions the 
Board will grant him an upgrade. 

 

The applicant does not provide any supporting documentation. 

 

His complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 30 Jun 79. 
He received a BCD on 15 May 84 in the grade of airman basic (E-
1). 

 

Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts 
in this Record of Proceedings. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial. JAJM states the applicant was 
afforded all of the procedural rights offered by the court-
martial and appellate process. In addition, the applicant’s case 
was automatically referred and reviewed by the Air Force of 
Military Review; however, there was no evidence of error or 
injustice in the process of his case. While clemency may be 
granted under 10 U.S.C. 1552(f)(2), the applicant provides no 
justification for his request; therefore, clemency is not 
warranted in this case. Although the applicant states he 


deserves clemency because he was young when he committed the 
offenses and he has taken responsibility for his actions, 
unfortunately for him, he has not provided any supporting 
documents to show how he has taken responsibility for his 
actions. To overturn the applicant’s punishment now would 
require the Board to substitute its judgment for that rendered by 
the court and the convening authority over 28 years ago when the 
facts and circumstances were fresh. Additionally, clemency in 
this case would be unfair to those individuals who honorably 
served their country while in uniform. 

 

The AFLOA/JAJM complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 18 Feb 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. We considered 
upgrading his discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find 
the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting the 
relief sought on that basis. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 


 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2010-04717 in Executive Session on 7 Jun 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Dec 10. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 7 Feb 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Feb 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00715

    Original file (BC-2010-00715.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at Exhibit C. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is attached at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01226

    Original file (BC-2011-01226.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    JAJM has verified through the Record of Trial and the Air Force Automated Military Justice Analysis and Management System (AMJAMS) he received a BCD, not DD as part of his court-martial sentence. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01226 in Executive Session on 6 Dec 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00591

    Original file (BC-2008-00591.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00591 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: Veterans of Foreign Wars HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a honorable discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00653

    Original file (BC-2013-00653.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, stating, in part, that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the character of service was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFLOA/JAJM recommends approval,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02228

    Original file (BC-2010-02228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    JAJM indicates that under Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 1552(f), which amended the basic corrections board legislation, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Record’s (AFBCMR) ability to correct records related to courts- martial, is limited. Accordingly, they recommend the Board deny the applicant’s requested relief as untimely, but if the Board considers waiver of the time limitation appropriate, they recommend the Board deny the application on its merits. Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01179

    Original file (BC 2009 01179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01179 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. He was found guilty of all charges and specifications and sentenced to a bad conduct discharge (BCD), confinement for 48 months, forfeiture of all pay...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02459

    Original file (BC-2011-02459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02459 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). His attorney at the time advised him to plead guilty in order to receive a special court-martial; otherwise, he would have received a general court-martial where the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03210

    Original file (BC-2007-03210.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03210 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation provided an Investigative Report which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00779

    Original file (BC 2014 00779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because he wanted his record corrected since his discharge and is thankful to have the opportunity. On 17 Jun 82, the Air Force Court for Military Review found the approved findings and sentence were correct in law and fact. The requested relief cannot be done administratively given the application was received more than three (3) years since he was court-martialed and discharged.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03529

    Original file (BC 2014 03529.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03529 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to General (Under Honorable Conditions). As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E.) The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility...