RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04049
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reinstated to the grade of chief master sergeant (E-9) and
paid all back pay and allowances that may apply.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was released from active duty as a senior master sergeant (E-
8) effective 31 Jan 84; however, the highest rank he held on
active duty was chief master sergeant. He was promoted to chief
master sergeant effective 1 Dec 83 which was two months prior to
his retirement and transfer to the Retired Reserve.
The applicant does not provide any supporting documentation.
The applicants submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in
this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial. DPSOE states the servicing
Military Personnel Flight did not update the applicants grade
status reason code to 3G in a timely manner; therefore, his name
erroneously appeared on special order AE-383. The applicant
became ineligible for promotion when he submitted his retirement
application and subsequently retired before serving his 2-year
Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC).
The DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
14 Jan 11 for review and response. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful
consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence
of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to
warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the
advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and
have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence
applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate
regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-04049 in Executive Session on 23 Feb 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2010-
04049 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Oct 10.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 30 Nov 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jan 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04634
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits B and C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial. The applicant was considered and tentatively selected for promotion to master sergeant during promotion cycle 11E7. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03002
Had he received the DFC when the other crew members did, he would have been selected for promotion to master sergeant (E-7) during the 2008 E7 promotion cycle. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of a photograph of the aircrew in question, special orders reflecting the award of the DFC to the other aircrew members, unsigned documentation related to his submission for the DFC, his weighted airman promotion system score notice for the contested promotion cycle, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03785
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03785 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His request for retirement effective 1 Jun 09 be withdrawn, and his promotion sequence number for promotion to the grade of master sergeant be reinstated. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03270
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03270 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) for time served in Thailand (16 May 1969 through 15 May 1970) and supplemental promotion consideration to Master Sergeant (MSgt), Senior Master Sergeant (SMSgt), and Chief Master...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03380
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03380 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted from corporal to master sergeant (MSgt). Without official documentation supporting promotion to the higher grade, DPSOE must assume he was discharged in the appropriate grade. Unfortunately, the applicant’s military records are...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00999
On 1 Sep 58 (which was later changed to 1 May 57 per Special Order B-67), he was promoted to the grade of A2C and on 1 Oct 61, he was promoted to the grade of airman first class. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial and states the application should be time barred. Promotion boards selected individuals and the quotas received determined the number that could be promoted.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03299
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial and indicated they were unable to verify whether the applicant was selected for promotion to master sergeant, since promotion history files are only maintained for a period of 10 years as outlined in AFR 4-20, Table 35-12, Rule 29, Records Disposition Schedule. The applicant made a conscious decision to retire in lieu of accepting promotion to the rank of master sergeant and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03527
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of a screen shot of her Training Status Code from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS), an excerpt from AFI 36-2502 Airman Promotion/Demotion Programs, her Weighted Airman Promotion System Score Notice, and an AF IMT 330, Records Transmittal/Request. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the Air Force Offices of Primary Responsibility (OPR), which are attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01915
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01915 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her fathers records reflect that he was promoted to the grade of Chief Master Sergeant (CMSgt). The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04376
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04376 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank at the time of his discharge be corrected to reflect (E-7) master sergeant versus (E-6) technical sergeant. His DD Form 214 reflects he was honorably retired in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) effective 30 Sep 67, after serving 20...