Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02128
Original file (BC-2010-02128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02128 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was a young man away from home and not really able to adapt 
at the time. He has changed and grown into a responsible man, 
has been a good citizen, graduated from college, and believes 
since he has turned his life around his discharge should be 
upgraded to honorable. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement and a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release 
or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 
24 Nov 89 discharge. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered active duty in the Regular Air Force on 
7 Dec 83 and was progressively promoted to the grade of sergeant 
(Sgt/E-4). 

 

During his second enlistment of 1 Apr 88, the squadron commander 
initiated administrative discharge action against the applicant 
for misconduct, specifically, minor disciplinary infractions. 
The underlying basis for this action was a series of 
disciplinary infractions committed by the applicant. 
Specifically, for the acts of misconduct, he received an 
Article 15 for failing to perform assigned duties, and vacation 
of suspended punishment for driving while drunk; three Letters 
of Reprimand (LORs) for operating a vehicle while drunk, failing 
to sign a check at the base exchange and failing dormitory 
inspection, and three Letters of Counseling (LOCs) for failure 


to return to duty on two occasions, dereliction of duty, and 
failure to obey a lawful order. 

 

After consulting with counsel and having been advised of his 
rights, he submitted a conditional waiver of his right to have 
his case heard before an administrative discharge board upon 
receipt of a general discharge. The wing staff judge advocate 
recommended a general discharge, without probation and 
rehabilitation (P&R). The discharge authority approved the 
general discharge without P&R. 

 

The applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10, 
on 24 Nov 89, in the grade of airman first class. With a reason 
for separation of misconduct – pattern of minor disciplinary 
infractions, with service characterized as general (under 
honorable conditions). He was credited with 1 year, 7 months, 
and 24 days of active duty service, including 4 years, 3 months, 
and 24 days of prior active service. 

 

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an 
investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

On 31 Jan 11, a copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the 
applicant for comment. At that time, he was also invited to 
provide additional evidence pertaining to his activities since 
leaving the service (Exhibit D). However, as of this date, no 
response has been received by this office. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice 
that occurred during the discharge process. Based on the 
available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was 
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. 
The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to 
believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the 
provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or 
disproportionate to the offenses committed. We also find 
insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the 
discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. Considering the 
applicant’s overall record of service, the FBI Report of 


Investigation, and the lack of post service information since 
his discharge, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the 
characterization of his discharge is warranted. Therefore, in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon 
which to recommend granting the relief sought. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-02128 in Executive Session on 15 March 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 May 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. FBI Report of Investigation. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 31 Jan 11, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00884

    Original file (BC-2012-00884.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. On 12 Dec 89, the applicant’s commander notified her he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for minor disciplinary infractions. The Board took note of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02409

    Original file (BC-2011-02409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02409 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01535

    Original file (BC-2010-01535.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01535 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded. c. He exhibited disorderly conduct, for this misconduct he received an Article 15. We have considered the available evidence of record; however, considering his overall record of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03771

    Original file (BC-2005-03771.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For this incident, he received a record of counseling. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 Dec 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Dec 05.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03866

    Original file (BC-2007-03866.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03866 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 22 Sep 86, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for failing to report at the prescribed time to a military doctor and his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02224

    Original file (BC-2010-02224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02224 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. We have considered the available evidence of record; however, considering his overall record of service, the FBI Report of Investigation, and the lack of post service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01602

    Original file (BC-2007-01602.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01602 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 24 OCTOBER 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. In support of his application, the applicant submits a copy of his DD 214 and his application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00478

    Original file (BC-2012-00478.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00478 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 29 Dec 92, the applicant’s commander notified him that she was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force for Misconduct - Pattern of Minor Disciplinary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0000152

    Original file (0000152.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The recommendation for discharge for misconduct was approved and the commander directed that applicant be given an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. On 23 Dec 83, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39- 10 (Misconduct-Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions) in the grade of airman first class with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge and an RE code of 2B (Separated with other than an honorable discharge). Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03294

    Original file (BC-2005-03294.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03294 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Apr 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Other than Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 27 Feb 90, the applicant’s case was forwarded through channels by the wing...