Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01692
Original file (BC-2010-01692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01692 

COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general (under 
honorable conditions) discharge. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Due to his immaturity and the group of people he chose to hang-
out with, he made a very bad choice. He has been a Firefighter 
Emergency Medical Technician for the past 23 years and a 
respected member of his community. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
letter. 

 

A copy of the applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, 
is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial. JAJM states the record shows the 
applicant was afforded all of the procedural rights offered by 
the court-martial and appellate process. There is no evidence of 
error or injustice in the process of the applicant’s court-
martial or appeal. 

 

JAJM indicates that under Title 10, United States Code (USC), 
Section 1552(f), which amended the basic corrections board 
legislation, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military 
Record’s (AFBCMR) ability to correct records related to courts-
martial, is limited. Specifically, Section 1552(f)(1) permits 


the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by reviewing 
authorities under the UCMJ. Additionally, Section 1552(f)(2) 
permits the correction of records related to action on the 
sentence of courts-martial for the purpose of clemency. Apart 
from these two limited exceptions, the effect of Section 1552(f) 
is that the AFBCMR is without authority to reverse, set-aside, or 
otherwise expunge a court-martial conviction that occurred on or 
after 5 May 1950 (the effective date of the UCMJ). 

 

It is JAJM’s opinion that while clemency may be granted under 
Title 10 USC Section 1552 (f) (2), the applicant provides no 
justification for his request, and clemency is not warranted in 
this case. The applicant’s work as a firefighter, however 
admirable, does not demonstrate by itself that he has been 
rehabilitated since the time of his court-martial 33 years ago. 
The inclusion of a BCD in the applicant’s sentence was well 
within the legal limits and was part of an appropriate punishment 
for the offenses committed. Nothing by the applicant erases this 
past criminal conduct and he has certainly not provided anything 
to support action by the Board to overturn the BCD. To overturn 
this punishment now would require the Board to substitute its 
judgment for that rendered by the court and convening authority 
33 years ago when the facts and circumstances were fresh. A BCD 
was and continues to be part of a proper sentence and properly 
characterizes his service. 

 

The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 29 October 2010, for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case 


since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his 
post-service activities. Therefore, the applicant’s request is 
not favorably considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01692 in Executive Session on 1 February 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01692: 

 

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Apr 10, w/atch. 

Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

Exhibit C. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 30 Jun 10. 

Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02238

    Original file (BC-2010-02238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02238 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. JAJM indicates that under Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 1552(f), which amended the basic corrections board legislation, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Record’s (AFBCMR)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03277

    Original file (BC-2010-03277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03277 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. The applicant does not provide any support for the idea that he has been rehabilitated since the time of his court-martial 23 years ago. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we find no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02184

    Original file (BC-2010-02184.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Air Force Board of Review on 25 Jan 61 found the findings and sentence correct in law and fact. He has not provided any evidence that his being AWOL was caused by racism or discrimination. Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2010-02184 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01478

    Original file (BC-2010-01478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: During his time in the service he performed his duties in an exceptional manner. The mere fact that the applicant continues to accept responsibility for his actions does not erase his past criminal conduct, does not make his BCD any less appropriate for the offenses he committed and certainly does not weigh in favor of Board action now to undo that part of the punishment. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02228

    Original file (BC-2010-02228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    JAJM indicates that under Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 1552(f), which amended the basic corrections board legislation, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Record’s (AFBCMR) ability to correct records related to courts- martial, is limited. Accordingly, they recommend the Board deny the applicant’s requested relief as untimely, but if the Board considers waiver of the time limitation appropriate, they recommend the Board deny the application on its merits. Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01383

    Original file (BC-2010-01383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He wants his discharge upgraded in order to seek employment with the government. On 6 Dec 85, the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03182

    Original file (BC 2014 03182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03182 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. In accordance with 10 USC 1552(f), the Board has no authority to overturn the court-martial conviction but may only on the basis of clemency, correct the actions taken by the reviewing authorities, i.e., the sentence. The complete AFLOA/JAJM evaluation is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01179

    Original file (BC 2009 01179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01179 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. He was found guilty of all charges and specifications and sentenced to a bad conduct discharge (BCD), confinement for 48 months, forfeiture of all pay...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00715

    Original file (BC-2010-00715.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at Exhibit C. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is attached at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00197

    Original file (BC-2009-00197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00197 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. We also find no evidence which indicates the applicant’s service characterization, which had its basis in his conviction by a general court-martial and...