Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04137
Original file (BC-2009-04137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2009-04137
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show his eligibility for Fiscal Year 
2009 (FY09) Air National Guard (ANG) Aviator Continuation Pay 
(ACP) program.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He signed an ACP contract in good faith to serve for an entire 
year.  It was only because of the 1,095 day rule that his orders 
were not cut for an entire year.  Even though his orders were 
amended after a 1,095-day waiver was approved, he was still not 
eligible.  The injustice in this case is that he served the entire 
year commitment, as other ACP recipients did, but he was not paid 
due to legal limitations imposed on the ACP program by a separate 
and distinct law; the 1,095-day rule.  

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his 
active duty orders, his FY09 ACP agreement, and pertinent 
electronic communications. 

Applicant’s complete submission is attached.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

ANG personnel are limited to serving cumulative periods of active 
duty and full-time National Guard duty not to exceed 1,095 days in 
the previous 1,460 days.  The 1,095 day rule can be waived and the 
orders of those ANG aviators who will exceed the 1,095 day rule 
during a tour of active duty are generally limited to less than a 
year until such time as they have been approved for a waiver.  The 
1,095 day rule limits otherwise willing aviators to less than a 
continuous year of service thereby, making them ineligible to 
participate in the ANG ACP program for that particular year.

Applicant is currently serving in with the Maine ANG (MEANG) in 
the grade of lieutenant colonel and has an Aeronautical Service 
Date (ASD) of 17 Jul 87, yielding approximately 21 Years of 
Aviation Service (YAS) and TAFMS of just over 13 years for FY09 
eligibility.

ANG eligibility requirements for the FY09 ACP program required 
aviators to be on active duty orders cut for one continuous, 
uninterrupted year.  Original orders issued for periods of duty of 
less than one year disqualified aviators from ACP participation.  
Further, orders issued for periods of less than one year that were 
later amended or modified to total a year of service, were also 
not acceptable.  Additional requirements include that the aviator 
have less than 19 years TAFMS, have less than 24 YAS at 
application, and make application for ACP within 30 days of 
beginning their tour.  

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we note that, as an incentive-based program 
(as opposed to an entitlement), the ACP requirement that 
aviators perform active duty on orders that reflect one 
continuous, uninterrupted year is a valid condition of 
eligibility.  Regardless of his intent, the applicant was simply 
not able to meet the ANG FY09 ACP requirements and accordingly 
is not eligible to participate in the FY09 ACP program.  It 
appears the applicant was aware of the 1,095 day rule and what 
impact it would have on his ACP eligibility – waiver 
notwithstanding.  Consequently, we find that the incidence of a 
law or policy that impacts another that results in a negative 
outcome does not necessarily produce an error or injustice.  
Moreover, there has been no showing that he has been treated any 
differently than others who were similarly situated.  Absent 
evidence showing he was either misled or miscounseled or that 
the Air National Guard erred in some way that wrongly kept him 
from qualifying for ACP, we can find no error or injustice in 
this case.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 

application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2009-04137 in Executive Session on 2 September 2010, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit: DD Form 149, dated, w/atchs.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04140

    Original file (BC-2009-04140.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The 1,095 day rule limits otherwise willing aviators to less than a continuous year of service thereby, making them ineligible to participate in the ANG ACP program for that particular year. ANG eligibility requirements for the FY09 ACP program required aviators to be on active duty orders cut for one continuous, uninterrupted year. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04168

    Original file (BC-2009-04168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The 1,095 day rule limits otherwise willing aviators to less than a continuous year of service thereby, making them ineligible to participate in the ANG ACP program for that particular year. ANG eligibility requirements for the FY09 ACP program required aviators to be on active duty orders cut for one continuous, uninterrupted year. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00962

    Original file (BC-2009-00962.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FY09 ANG ACP Implementation Policy requires aviators to be on active duty orders in FY09 for one uninterrupted year (no modification to original orders). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we note the FY09 ANG ACP eligibility guidelines include the requirement that ANG aviators be on active duty for one full year with no modification to their original order. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00604

    Original file (BC-2009-00604.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to show his eligibility to participate in the Air National Guard (ANG) Fiscal Year 2008 (FY08) Aviation Continuation Pay (ACP) program. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we note the applicant did not meet ANG FY08 ACP eligibility requirements for the FY08 ACP program. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00573

    Original file (BC-2009-00573.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00573 INDEX CODE: 128.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show his eligibility to participate in the Air National Guard (ANG) Fiscal Year 2008 (FY08) Aviation Continuation Pay (ACP) program. The applicant was initially ordered to extended active duty from 1 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-02323

    Original file (BC-2009-02323.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: ANG eligibility requirements for the FY08 ACP program required aviators to be on active duty orders for one uninterrupted year (no amendments or modifications to original orders); have less than 20 years of aviation service (YAS) at application and, not go over 20 YAS during the current contract. The applicant was initially ordered to extended active duty from 1 Oct 07 through 31 Dec 07. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04301

    Original file (BC-2008-04301.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He met the eligibility requirements to participate in the ANG FY08 ACP program as he was on one continuous active duty order for the entire FY performing the duties of an ANG pilot during that time frame. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03725

    Original file (BC-2011-03725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, no eligible RPA pilot will be able to take advantage of this due to the way one year orders are allocated and the delay in the release of the FY11 guidance. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his Air National Guard (ANG) FY11 ACP Program Announcement and Implementation Policy, aeronautical order, FY11 ACP Agreement Statement of Understanding (SOU), and other documents in support of his application. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01912

    Original file (BC-2008-01912.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his active duty orders, the FY06 Implementation Policy, letters from his wing commander, and an individual data summary. Those aviators on MPA days were not eligible for the FY06 ANG ACP. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01033

    Original file (BC 2009 01033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His unit is a traditional C-130 unit and has no active duty positions, thus he was not aware of the ACP program until he was on deployment and found out about the program through other Air National Guard (ANG) crew members. A1FF notes that the applicant’s active duty order was extended several times in order for him to reach one year of active duty service. We took notice of the applicant's complete...