Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00940-2
Original file (BC-2009-00940-2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
ADDENDUM TO 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00940 

 COUNSEL: 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His narrative reason for separation (Attrition, Unsuitability – 
Character and Behavior Disorders) be removed. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 
22 October 2009. For an accounting of the facts and 
circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the 
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of 
Proceedings at Exhibit F. 

 

In December 2009, the applicant requested reconsideration; 
however, the Board staff determined his request did not meet the 
criteria for reconsideration. 

 

The applicant submitted a DD Form 149, dated 1 February 2010, 
with attachments, again requesting reconsideration of his case. 
He indicates his character disorder and behavior disorder are 
medical assessments and violate his privacy by being placed on an 
official document. He provides a letter from his clinical 
psychologist. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit G. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered 
the weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided 
by the applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the 
time of any previous application. However, since no new and 
relevant evidence has been provided, we find the request does not 
meet the criteria for reconsideration. As the applicant has been 
previously advised, reconsideration is provided only where newly 
discovered relevant evidence is presented which was not available 
when the application was submitted. Further, the reiteration of 
facts we have previously addressed, uncorroborated personal 


observations, or additional arguments on the evidence of record 
are not adequate grounds for reopening a case. Therefore, in 
view of the above and in the absence of new and relevant 
evidence, we find no basis to reconsider the applicant’s request. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-00940 in Executive Session on 7 December 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-00940 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 16 November 2009, 

 w/atchs. 

 Exhibit G. DD Form 149, dated 1 February 2010, w/atch. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 00940 2

    Original file (BC 2009 00940 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00940 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Attrition, Unsuitability – Character and Behavior Disorders) be removed. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00940

    Original file (BC-2009-00940.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00940 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Attrition, Unsuitability- Character and Behavior Disorders) be removed. In support of his request, the applicant provided a statement from his psychologist. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00940

    Original file (BC 2009 00940.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00940 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Attrition, Unsuitability- Character and Behavior Disorders) be removed. In support of his request, the applicant provided a statement from his psychologist. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00790 ADDENDUM

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00790 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s appeal for reconsideration, he requests his reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a “1” code that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 02990

    Original file (BC 2007 02990.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 February 1976, the Board considered and denied a request from the applicant to amend his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, to include the discharge authority. On 25 September 2008, the Board considered and denied his request for a medical retirement, a change to his narrative reason for separation, RE code, award of the AFGCM, completed basic training, completed career development courses, and promotion to the grade of sergeant. We have...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04570 ADDENDUM

    After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not find it sufficient to change the Board’s earlier determination in this case. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02989

    Original file (BC 2010 02989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On behalf of the applicant, an accredited veterans administration claims agent/veterans advocate, indicated subsequent to the Board’s original decision, he was diagnosed with an aggravated chronic mental health condition and was awarded a combined compensable disability rating of 50 percent (Major Depressive Disorder) by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). In this respect, we note that while the two supporting statements indicate the applicant suffers from major depressive disorder...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00270 ADDENDUM

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. By way of undated letter, the applicant requests reconsideration and submits additional supporting documentation for reconsideration. First he was not provided a Medical Evaluation Board assessment while on active duty. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00052-2

    Original file (BC-2009-00052-2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. The applicant submitted a letter, with attachments, requesting reconsideration of his case. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00456-2

    Original file (BC-2006-00456-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, since no new and relevant evidence has been provided, we find the request does not meet the criteria for reconsideration. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application....