Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-03207
Original file (BC-2009-03207.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	
		DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2009-03207
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM).

___________________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE:

On 1 Apr 10, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s 
request to award him the AFCAM.  For an accounting of the facts 
and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request and the 
rational of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of 
Proceedings at Exhibit E (with Exhibits A and C).

By letter, undated, the applicant requests reconsideration 
contending that the citation accompanying the Air Medal (AM), 
dated 26 Jul 05, defines direct support of combat zone and the 
eligible theater of operations to include eligible timeframe.  
Furthermore, the AM citation indicates repeated exposure to 
“small arms and rocket propelled grenade fire from Iraqi 
insurgents” while performing assigned duties; therefore, he 
should have been awarded the AFCAM.  

In support of the appeal, the applicant submits a copy of AM 
citation and special order.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit F.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

USAFCENT recommends denial.  They reviewed and disapproved the 
applicant’s request to be awarded the AFCAM based on the 
justification not supporting the award.  Additionally, they note 
that the governing instructions only allow a one-time request 
for reconsideration.  Since this submission was the applicant’s 
one-time reconsideration, the awarding authority’s decision is 
final.  



The complete USAFCENT evaluation is at Exhibit G.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 21 Oct 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, this office has received no response.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

In an earlier finding, the Board determined that there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in 
support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not find 
it sufficient to change the Board’s earlier determination in 
this case.  The applicant has not provided evidence showing that 
the determination of USCENTAF was made in error and we are not 
persuaded by his assertions of the existence of an injustice in 
this case.  Our determination in no way is meant to demean the 
applicant’s accomplishments during the war on terror and it 
appears he has been appropriately recognized for his actions.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in 
this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2009-03207 in Executive Session on 3 Dec 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit E.  Record of Proceedings, dated 26 Apr 10, w/atchs.
    Exhibit F.  Letter, Applicant, undated.
    Exhibit G.  Letter, USAFCENT, dated 10 Jul 13.
    Exhibit H.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 21 Oct 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair








Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00191

    Original file (BC-2010-00191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM). After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant's complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the AFCAM. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-00191 in Executive Session on 20 Jul 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02013

    Original file (BC 2014 02013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02013 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal and the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02637

    Original file (BC-2011-02637.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CRM is awarded to U.S. Air Force, U.S. Air Force Reserve Service members, and Service members of other Services after 1 Aug 1960, for sustained individual combat or mission readiness or preparedness for direct weapon-system employment. According to the applicant's official military record, he was awarded the VSM with two Bronze Service Stars (w/2 BSS) for his service in Vietnam from 26 Feb 1972 to 21 Apr 1972. The complete DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02441

    Original file (BC-2008-02441.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that her records should be corrected to show she was awarded the AFCAM. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008- 02441 in Executive Session on 6 January 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair Ms. Audrey F. Davis, Member Mr. Grover L. Dunn,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02111

    Original file (BC 2010 02111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02111 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) medal. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 1 Feb 11, the applicant’s case...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01359

    Original file (BC-2013-01359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFCAM may be awarded for qualifying service from Sept. 11, 2001 to a date to be determined. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial stating the applicant has not exhausted all administrative avenues for award of the AFCAM; the applicant may request...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01068

    Original file (BC-2013-01068.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change the “Given Under My Hand” dates for his five Air Medals, indicating the requests for the awards were processed in a timely manner and the dates...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02175

    Original file (BC-2007-02175.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The command recommended that the package be resubmitted as an AFCM. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. BY...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2009-00802

    Original file (BC-2009-00802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM). However, the award criteria for the ACM states no member shall be entitled to both the GWOT-E medal for that service. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 7 Mar 13, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2009- 00802: Exhibit E. Record of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-02134

    Original file (BC-2009-02134.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS He be awarded the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM) for qualifying duty in Iraq where he served as an aircrew member (navigator) from 28 Jul 04 through 15 Oct 04. Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 7 Jul 09, w/atch.