Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01182
Original file (BC-2009-01182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01182 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect award of the Republic of 
Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

A review of his records or his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the 
United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, dated 14 Oct 68 
should provide sufficient justification/evidence for award of the 
RVGCN. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his 
DD Form 214 and DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Armed 
Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge. 

 

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit 
A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 15 Mar 65, he contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular 
Air Force. He was progressively promoted to the rank of airman 
first class having assumed that grade effective and with a date 
of rank of 8 Dec 65. He served three years and seven months on 
active duty. 

 

AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, reflects he served in Vietnam 
from 22 Jul 67 through 18 Jul 68. 

 

On 26 Apr 99, AFPC/DPPRA informed him that during the time he 
served in Vietnam his unit was not eligible for the RVNGC. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states no official 
documentation was located to verify his eligibility for award of 
the RVNGC. 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR's completion evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant provided a copy of the criteria for the RVNGC which 
states US Military units were individually cited for award of the 
RVNGC; however, the Vietnamese Government issued the award to all 
units subordinate to Military Assistance Command during the 
period 8 Feb 62 and 28 Mar 73 and to US Army Vietnam and its 
subordinate units for the period 20 Jul 65 to 28 Mar 73. This 
permits all personnel who served in Vietnam to wear the RVNGC. 
He questions whether this specifically is for US Army units or 
all military units. 

 

The applicant's complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit 
E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a 
thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence 
that the applicant is eligible for the award of the RVGCN. In 
regard to the applicant's request for clarification on whether 
the RVGCN is for US Army units only or all military units, the 
RVGCN is awarded by the Republic of Vietnam to units for heroic 
combat achievements; entitlement to the RVNGC is verified in 
accordance with DOD 1348.33M and AF Pamphlet 900-2. The unit 
must be listed in the AF Pamphlet or official documentation must 
be available that verifies the unit as being recognized for an 
award. Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, we agree with 
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility and find no compelling basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board this application in Executive 
Session on 25 Aug 09, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Mar 09, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 23 Apr 09. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jun 09. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 8 Jun 09, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01182

    Original file (BC 2009 01182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 Apr 99, AFPC/DPPRA informed him that during the time he served in Vietnam his unit was not eligible for the RVNGC. HQ AFPC/DPSIDR's completion evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a copy of the criteria for the RVNGC which states US Military units were individually cited for award of the RVNGC; however, the Vietnamese Government issued the award to all units...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04002

    Original file (BC-2011-04002.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Entitlement verified – will be administratively corrected) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The applicant asserts that other members of his units received the AFOUA w/V &1OLC and the RVNGC w/P and two Bronze Service Stars, while serving in Vietnam. A letter from the Air Force Historical Research Agency (AFHRA) to a member of his unit clearly states the AFOUA w/2 V’s is authorized because “all” detachments to this unit share...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01030

    Original file (BC-2005-01030.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01030 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01435

    Original file (BC-2011-01435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01435 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Oct 11 for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02402

    Original file (BC-2011-02402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. DPAPP states they could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect service in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03687

    Original file (BC-2010-03687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of boots on ground in Vietnam, stating, in part, that the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence that substantiates foreign service time in Vietnam. While it is not conclusive that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam, we find the submitted evidence to be credible and consistent with his statements and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02499

    Original file (BC-2009-02499.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02499 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and other unit medals for the time he served in Vietnam. VSM Criterion: The VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03763

    Original file (BC-2008-03763.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. There are no documents or evidence within his records that reflect he served in Vietnam. However, after a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded the VSM.