Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00819
Original file (BC-2009-00819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00819 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His narrative reason for separation be changed from “Hardship” to 
a medical discharge. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His back has given him problems ever since he separated from the 
military. He has received 30 treatments for pain. At the time of 
his separation from the military, he did not apply for a 
disability discharge because he did not need it; however, he 
needs it now due to medical problems he is experiencing. 

 

In support of his application, applicant submits a personal 
statement, a copy of DD Form 256AF, Honorable Discharge 
Certificate, a copy of his certificate of service from the Army, 
a copy of WD AGO 53-280, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation 
Certificate of Service, and a letter for the National Personnel 
Records Center. 

 

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit 
A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Based on the available documentation on file, the applicant 
enlisted in the Air Force on 5 October 1948. 

 

On 3 May 1949, he was diagnosed with a lumbo-sacral strain and 
referred to the orthopaedics clinic. A Report of Medical 
Examination, dated 8 May 1950 failed to show the presence of a 
chronic or duty-limiting back ailment. 

 

On 11 May 1950, he was honorably discharged for hardship reasons 
and transferred to the Air Force Reserve until 3 July 1951. He 
served 1 year, 7 months and 6 days of total active service. 

 

 

 

 


The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) denied the applicant's 
claim for service connected disability benefits for chronic back 
pain, citing his military service condition was likely temporary 
and resolved after treatment. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant's 
request and states that there is no record of chronic treatment 
of a back ailment, nor a resultant chronic functional impairment 
requiring imposition of duty restrictions that prohibited the 
applicant's worldwide qualification. He has not met the burden of 
proof of a medical condition that warranted compensation by the 
Military Disability Evaluation System. While his back strain 
clearly occurred during military service, the BCMR Medical 
Consultant could not establish a connection with his current 
chronic degenerative disc disease or arthritis; a condition that 
likely represents the natural progression of the aging process 
and not the result of a service-incurred disease of injury. 

 

 

BCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 29 June 2009 for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting a 
change in his narrative reason for separation. Applicant’s 
contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinions 
and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant and adopt his 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no 
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 


_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
BC-2009-00819 in Executive Session on 22 September 2009, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-00819 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 29 Jun 09. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 09. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02006

    Original file (BC-2009-02006.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ BCMR Medical Consultant’s Evaluation: The BCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00798

    Original file (BC-2009-00798.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00798 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received a medical discharge or medical retirement, rather than an administrative discharge based on minor disciplinary infractions. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00444

    Original file (BC-2008-00444.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00444 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he was medically retired from the Air Force on 8 June 2007 due to a back injury considered in the line of duty (ILOD). On 28 March 2006, he had requested an LOD determination for a lower...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03142

    Original file (BC-2007-03142.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Board of Officers determined that his conditions existed prior to service (EPTS) ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of relief, and concludes the applicant’s chronic pain or functional impairment currently involving his shoulders, back, or limbs, likely represents the expected natural progression of a degenerative process over time; or, as in the case of his shoulder pain, likely resulted from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04477

    Original file (BC-2012-04477.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Indeed, the DVA rating letter dated 2 Aug 12 found no basis for military service connection for lumbar spine strain related to chronic back pain. However, even if the disorder was present during the period of service and there was evidence of an upper thoracic disc protrusion (T10-T11), either condition would not necessarily be considered disqualifying or unfitting for continued military service and there was no evidence that either condition was the cause of service termination. In...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04820

    Original file (BC-2011-04820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 February 2007, the IPEB found him unfit and recommended he be discharged under the provisions of Title 10, U.S.C for chronic low back pain, with disc herniation and recommended he receive severance pay with a disability rating of 10 percent. He received an epidural treatment on 12 May 2005 and reported sustained relief for one month. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered BCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04820 in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00162

    Original file (BC-2009-00162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/SG recommends denial of the applicant's request and states that he was deemed medically disqualified for world-wide active military service due to chronic pain in his shoulder. Air Force Regulation (AFR) 35-41,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01659

    Original file (BC 2013 01659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Boards may rate any condition they find that renders the service member unfit for service. Further, it must be noted the Air Force disability boards must rate disabilities based on the member’s condition at the time of evaluation; in essence, a snapshot of their condition at that time. On 25 April 2007, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the applicant unfit for further military service due to chronic low back pain, with disc extrusion of L4-5 and L5-S1, and recommended...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04292

    Original file (BC-2009-04292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He served in the grade of captain for 6 plus years, but after 20 years of service, he was retired at his highest enlisted grade of technical sergeant(E-6) because of the 10-year officer rule, despite having serious medical issues that were not addressed. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to be retired in the grade of captain and to be paid leave at the officer rate. Sufficient...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00308

    Original file (BC-2005-00308.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application, applicant provided a personal letter, and copies of his medical records. On 12 July 2004, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) concluded that no single problem was individually unfitting but that combined, the applicant's chronic neck pain secondary to degenerative disk disease associated with vagal response syncopal episodes, right upper extremity paresthesias, migraine headaches and mood disorder were unfitting for continued military service. ...