RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04521
INDEX NUMBER: 104.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. The Aerobic Fitness Report dated 15 Apr 08 be declared void and
removed from her records.
2. The Unfavorable Information File established on 6 Jun 08, be voided
and removed from her records (The applicant amended her appeal and
withdrew this contention via an email dated 30 Apr 09).
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She has several medical conditions that placed her on a medical profile
on or before the examination date of 15 Apr 08. She completed the
Fitness Screening Questionnaire on 7 Apr 08, stating that she needed
medical attention prior to testing and her fitness assessment should
have been delayed pending a medical evaluation. She scheduled a medical
appointment on 11 Apr 08 and her physician initiated a Duty Limitation
Report.
In support of the appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement,
documentation related to her request, and an email indicating her desire
to withdraw her request to void the UIF.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant currently serves in the Regular Air Force in the grade of
staff sergeant and is stationed at Charleston AFB, South Carolina. She
was scheduled for a fitness assessment and completed a Fitness Screening
Questionnaire on 7 Apr 09, noting that she required medical attention
prior to her fitness assessment. She was scheduled for a medical
appointment at the
Family Practice Clinic on 11 Apr 08 at 1245. She underwent a fitness
assessment on 15 Apr 08 at 0741, which she failed and scored below
average. A Duty Limiting Condition Report provided by her physician on
15 Apr 08 exempted her from walking and running.
On 19 Mar 09, AFPC/DPSIM requested additional supporting documentation
from the applicant to substantiate her claim. As of this date no
response has been received from the applicant (Exhibit B).
______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP indicates there is no medical
basis that precluded the applicant from being assessed on the cycle
ergometry on 15 Apr 08. The 15 Apr 08 medical profile exempted her from
the run walk aerobic components only. In conjunction with AF/SG3, they
conclude the fitness assessment dated 15 Apr 08 is valid and should not
be removed from her records.
A1PP states the applicant saw her physician prior to the 15 Apr 08
fitness assessment, and she was not exempt from the cycle ergometry on
or prior to her 15 Apr 08 fitness assessment.
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19
Jun 09, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2008-
04521 in Executive Session on 17 Sep 09, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
Mr. Steven A. Cantrell, Member
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Dec 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, USAF/A1PP, dated 8 Jun 09, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 09.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04745
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04745 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 24 Apr 10, she petitioned the AFBCMR (Docket Number BC-2010- 02102) to void her referral EPR for the period 18 Oct 07 through 28 Oct 08, contending she was not given sufficient time to adjust to the new workout plan given to her by her doctors. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006
His providers memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test. On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02102
After a thorough review of the available records, the majority of the Board found no evidence that the applicants referral EPR is unjust or inaccurate. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 36- 2502, table 1.1, Rule 22, receipt of a referral report renders a member ineligible for promotion; therefore, a majority of the Board recommends denying her request to reinstate her line number for promotion to technical sergeant. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00324
On or about 18 March 2011, the applicant requested a two-week extension of the close-out date of the contested report to include a successful fitness assessment. On 24 November 2013, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board voided the Fitness Assessments, dated 26 August 2004, 21 July 2005, 21 February 2006, 4 April 2008 and 14 October 2009, and they have been removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System. Moreover, we also recognize that she would have been able to successfully...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03057
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03057 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 2 July 2009 through 15 April 2010 be voided and removed from her records. The following is a resume of the applicants EPR profile: PERIOD ENDING PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION 20 Dec 01 (SrA)...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04864
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unjustly given an unsatisfactory FA score for being a No Show at the 15 Apr 12 testing, even though she had a medical condition which should have prevented her from taking the abdominal circumference (AC) portion. On 19 Jun 12, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling from her Deputy Group Commander for receiving an unsatisfactory FA score on 15 Apr 12 and for fitness testing integrity...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01644
IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier. On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01664
IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier. On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00706
Additionally, unit commanders may request an extension of the close-out date, when an individual is required to fitness test immediately preceding the EPR close-out date and fails to meet fitness standards. It appears the applicant contends that he was injured during the 22 Sep 08 PT test, and the test should be invalidated and the EPR closing on 9 Oct 08 should be declared void and removed from his records. Further, the Board is not persuaded the EPR should be voided, since he failed the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04414
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04414 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 12 Aug 08, 27 Apr 10, 29 Jul l0, 3 Nov l0, and 24 Apr 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 7 May 12 she was medically evaluated, at the request of her...