Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04074
Original file (BC-2007-04074.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-04074
            INDEX CODE:  100.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His disenrollment from the Montgomery  GI  Bill  (MGIB)  of  6  Aug  85,  be
declared void.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He declined enrollment as a new airman in the Air Force and  did  not  fully
understand the one-time only enrollment opportunity.

At the time he declined enrollment, he was concerned more about his  ability
to send money home to help his family than his education benefits.

As a young man joining  the  military,  his  thoughts  were  to  escape  the
environment from which he had came and to make a  better  life  for  himself
and to provide some monetary support to his family back at home.

He has  inquired  many  times  on  reversing  his  declined  enrollment  and
discovered the correction of records process while deployed to Afghanistan.

He has dedicated his life to his country and the Air Force  for  many  years
and desires to enroll in the MGIB in hopes to continue his  education  after
his career in the Air Force.

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 26 Jul 85  and  is  currently
serving in the grade of technical sergeant.

Title 38, U.S.C, Chapter 30, stipulates that all  MGIB-eligible  individuals
are automatically enrolled in the program upon entering active duty and  are
given a  thorough  briefing  on  the  program.   Individuals  accepting  the
automatic enrollment incur a monthly pay reduction of $100 during the  first
year of active duty.  Individuals desiring not to participate are given  the
opportunity to disenroll. By law, disenrollment is an irrevocable  decision.
 Disenrollment is complete when the individual completes that  part  of  the
DD Form 2366, Veteran’s Educational Assistance Act of 1984 (GI Bill),  which
states, “I do not  desire  to  participate  in  the  GI  Bill  of  1984.   I
understand that the option to enroll will not be available to me at a  later
date.”

The applicant’s DD Form 2366 declining MGIB coverage was  signed  on  6  Aug
85.

Congress provided an avenue for individuals to reverse  their  disenrollment
decisions when, in 1988, it amended Title 38, U.S.C.,  Section  3108.   This
legislation provided an “open period” between 1 Dec 88 and  30  Jun  89  for
individuals to enroll in the MGIB.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial.  DPSIT states that all individuals  receive  a
structured MGIB briefing at Basic Military Training and  recruiters  provide
the individual with written information to read and discuss with the  family
prior to enlistment.  The applicant offers no evidence of government  error.
 In addition, he did not participate in the  “open  window”  opportunity  to
enroll.

The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18  Apr
08 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit  D).   As  of  this  date,
this office has received a response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2007-04074
in Executive Session on 11 June 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
      Mr. Steven A. Cantrell, Member
      Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Nov 07.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 2 Apr 08.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Apr 08.




                                   CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02608

    Original file (BC-2008-02608.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSITE states the applicant provided no evidence of a government error that caused him to decline participation. Disenrollment is complete when the individual completes the portion of the DD Form 2366, which states "I do not desire to participate in the GI Bill of 1984. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02497

    Original file (BC-2007-02497.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His colleague had also declined the MGIB based on erroneous information he received during his in- processing. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. On 20 Jun 00, the applicant signed the DD Form 2366...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03265

    Original file (BC-2005-03265.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03265 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 April 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed an opportunity to reverse his declination to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) or his records be corrected to reflect enrollment in the Enlisted College Loan...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00285

    Original file (BC-2007-00285.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. DPPAT states the applicant completed the DD Form 2366 correctly. Currently, there are no other provisions under 38 U.S.C., Chapter 30 that allow an individual to reverse their decision once they have declined MGIB participation The DPPAT complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03456

    Original file (BC-2005-03456.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of six emails, and a copy of a letter requesting MGIB enrollment, with attachments. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAT states that the applicant submitted a DD Form 2366 dated 14 January 2002 in which she has elected disenrollment from the MGIB program. In the applicant’s master record is a DD Form 2366 dated 29 January 2002.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04866

    Original file (BC-2011-04866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The law stipulates all MGIB-eligible individuals are automatically enrolled in the MGIB upon entering active duty and are given a one-time opportunity for disenrollment should they desire not to participate in the program. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 12 Apr 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00246

    Original file (BC-2007-00246.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Deputy Chief of Staff, Manpower and Personnel, released an FY07 Force Shaping message outlining the voluntary separation pay (VSP) incentives which pays a lump sum payment to officers who voluntarily separate from active duty. The opportunity to participate or reverse a previous declination to participate in MGIB, if previously considered ineligible, is not authorized by the SecAF for those individuals who elect to separate voluntarily. We took notice of the applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01550

    Original file (BC-2004-01550.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 June 2003, he completed DD Form 2366, and was disenrolled from the MGIB. Applicant contends that he received a very quick briefing on the MGIB program and mistakenly signed the form disenrolling him from the MGIB program. However, based on the evidence of record, he has failed to substantiate that he was improperly counseled regarding his entitlements to the MGIB, or that procedural errors were made by the Air Force.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03407

    Original file (BC-2010-03407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03407 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be disenrolled from the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03113

    Original file (BC-2006-03113.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03113 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Apr 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The separation program designator (SPD) be changed on her DD Form 214 so she will be eligible for Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits. ...