RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01876
INDEX CODE: 108.07
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His service-connected medical conditions, intervertebral disc syndrome,
paralysis of external popliteal nerve (left lower), paralysis of median
nerve (left and right upper), bronchial asthma, sinusitis, and Individual
Unemployability (IU), be assessed as combat-related in order to qualify for
compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He desires CRSC for his service-connected medical conditions. His records
will reflect his job descriptions and the firearms he carried daily to
protect general officers, the commanders and men and women of the Air
Force. However, due to the classified nature of many of his assignments
the records may not be able to explain the assignments to one who never was
involved in counter espionage operations. He was constantly in harms way
due to his hazardous service commitment, dealing with the criminal elements
in the Air Force, protecting foreign dignitaries, terrorist threats to our
country, as well as the foreign countries he was stationed in. He never
realized he would spend the rest of his life running from his years of
military fears of armed conflict and hazardous service.
In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal statement and
documentation associated with his CRSC application.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 17
October 1960. He was progressively promoted to the grade of master
sergeant, having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1
July 1977. He served as a Special Investigations Superintendent and
Telephone Switching Equipment Technician. On 31 July 1981, he was relieved
from active duty and retired from the Air Force on 1 August 1981, having
served 20 years, 9 months, and 14 days on active duty.
Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined
compensable rating of 70% for his unfitting conditions.
His CRSC application was disapproved on 16 October 2006 based upon the fact
that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be
combat-related. However, his application was partially approved on 17
October 2007. PTSD was determined to be combat-related with a compensable
rating of 30%.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSDC recommends denial. DPSDC states there is no evidence showing a
combat-related event or events that caused his intervertebral disc syndrome
(lumbar spine) and the associated paralysis of external popliteal nerve
(left lower). In his initial application, applicant stated he injured his
back when he slipped on a wet patio during a narcotics arrest in 1970.
Whether slipping on a wet patio, getting into a car, or slipping on ice,
there is no evidence of a combat-related event or events that occurred
during these incidents that caused this disability and the associated
radiculopathy of the left lower extremity.
Furthermore, there is no evidence showing a combat-related event or events
that caused spondylolisthesis or segmental instability (cervical spine) and
the associated paralysis of median nerve (left and right upper). In his
initial application, applicant stated this injury was caused over a number
of years and was related to his lower back (lumbar) injury. Since the
lower back disability is not combat-related, and there was no evidence of a
separate, acute, combat-related neck injury, this disability cannot be
considered combat-related.
Applicant did not request consideration of bronchial asthma and sinusitis
in his initial application. In his request for correction of military
records, he added these disabilities. The Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) rating decision dated 18 February 2005 awarded service connection for
sinusitis and bronchitis based on service medical records indicating these
conditions occurred in service. Again, however, there is no evidence of
any combat-related cause. Exposure to the environment is not unique to
military service or combat-situations and these disabilities are not
presumptive conditions for Agent Orange exposure in Vietnam. Therefore,
these disabilities cannot be considered combat-related.
Lastly, IU is approved for CRSC when combat-related disabilities are equal
to or greater than 60% based on the VA requirement for IU. Since
applicant’s approved, combat-related disability (PTSD) is 30%, he is not
entitled to IU under the CRSC program.
The complete DPSDC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 26 October 2007, the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for
review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The available evidence of record does not
support a finding that the service-connected medical conditions the
applicant believes are combat-related were incurred as the direct result of
armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of
duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war;
and, therefore, do not qualify for compensation under the CRSC Act. We
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without
a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon
the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-
01876 in Executive Session on 28 April 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 May 2007, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSDC, dated 17 October 2007, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 October 2007.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00822
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His approved CRSC disabilities have a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) effective date of July 2002 or prior. However, the board is unable to adjust the CRSC effective dates to what the applicant is requesting since his retirement pay was not impacted on the dates he indicated. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01081
His service-connected medical condition, arthritis of the back and neck and sinusitis (bronchitis) be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01925
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSDC recommends denial. The complete DPSDC evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that his unit was in direct support of an Army Infantry Division. The available evidence of record does not support a finding that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019571
The artillery rounds were over 100 pounds each and had to be carried on the shoulder during firing missions. During firing, he was exposed to loud noises and he inhaled smoke that hurt the lungs and caused severe coughing because of the fumes. Without conclusive evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship of the applicant's conditions of bronchial asthma, right and left elbow strain, right and left carpel tunnel syndrome, thoracolumbar spine strain with spondylosis, and right and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018357
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show his medical conditions were determined to have been incurred as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war and that his disability be considered eligible for award of Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). There is no evidence in the available records which indicate the applicant's medical conditions were...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04418 ADDENDUM
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSDC recommends denial of the applicants request for an increase in her deceased husbands CRSC rating to 100 percent, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. As for her request related to his cysts, we also do not find the evidence she has presented sufficient to conclude that his CRSC rating should be increased based on this condition. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-01638
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant's evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant requests the Board contact his doctor by phone to further discuss his case. Accordingly, we recommend the applicant's records...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00970
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, documentation extracted from his medical records and documentation associated with his CRSC application. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA records does not show that his conditions are combat related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03786
Retiring as an E6 with 15 years of service, he had to waive his military retirement with an 80 percent disability which was approved by the Air Force Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The applicant has requested that his service medical records be re-evaluated under the CRSC program. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03676
A review of the records provided by the applicant show no cause for the hypothyroidism. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, does not qualify for...